![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/The-Good-Idea-Fairy-3.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Now this story just came out last week and there is a lot to unwind. I\u2019ll start with the actual Project Veritas story<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Project Veritas released a new video today, (January 25th<\/sup>) exposing a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, who claims that his company is exploring a way to \u201cmutate\u201d COVID via \u201cDirected Evolution\u201d to preempt the development of future vaccines. <\/b><\/p>\n Walker says that Directed Evolution is different than Gain-of-Function, which is defined as \u201ca mutation that confers new or enhanced activity on a protein.\u201d In other words, it means that a virus such as COVID can become more potent depending on the mutation \/ scientific experiment performed on it. <\/b><\/p>\n The Pfizer executive told a Veritas journalist about his company\u2019s plan for COVID vaccines, while acknowledging that people would not like this information if it went public. <\/b><\/p>\n Gee, ya think? People are already accepting that Fauci and others at the NIH and CDC used taxpayer funds to make the Coronavirus much more dangerous than it was, and that they shipped this off to a lab of questionable competence in the Peoples Republic of China. Thanks to their incompetence, the virus escaped the lab and we ended up with the Great Panicdemic of 2020.<\/p>\n \u201cOne of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create — preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine — no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses,\u201d Walker said. <\/b><\/p>\n The Project Veritas video and story has gone viral and a lot of people are starting to ask some pointed and uncomfortable questions. However, Big Pharma and Big Tech have already started the process of shutting down the story. Here are a few details from Just the News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n U<\/b>ndercover video that purportedly shows a Pfizer executive explaining the company’s “directed evolution” plan to keep COVID-19 a “cash cow<\/a>,” then furiously backpedaling when Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe exposes the ruse, has drawn intense curiosity from members of Congress but intermittent Big Tech throttling and a partial media blackout. <\/b><\/p>\n The individual that Project Veritas filmed started backpedaling as soon as he found out that he had potentially exposed Pfizer\u2019s \u201cdirty laundry.\u201d<\/p>\n Despite the fact that the figure identified as Jordon Walker belatedly called himself a “liar \u2026 trying to impress a person on a date<\/a>,” played the race card in requesting police involvement, and physically attacked O’Keefe and the film crew, a prominent tabloid inexplicably removed its article on the sting. <\/b><\/p>\n It was at this point that the media blackout and cover-up appears to have begun.<\/p>\n Newsweek’s fact-check<\/a> begins by aiming to discredit Project Veritas based on previous mainstream media fact-checks and then analyzes it line by line, at one point downplaying the potential problems gain-of-function research can cause. <\/b><\/p>\n I glanced at the Newsweek \u201cFact Check\u201d and then headed to the comments section. The short version from the comments I saw basically says \u201cWe\u2019re are not buying what you\u2019re selling Newsweek.\u201d It also looks like Google hasn\u2019t learned anything from the Twitter Files and is still suppressing results that makes Big Pharma look bad.<\/p>\n Fox News host Tucker Carlson<\/a> highlighted Google’s then-blackout of the controversy on his Thursday program, saying it illustrates the power of the pharmaceutical industry.\u00a0Carlson’s producer Gregg Re claimed<\/a> that a Google staffer who used to work for Fox “call[ed] us to kill the story.” <\/b><\/p>\n Sen. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) told Carlson<\/a> this was par for the course with Google, which, he alleged, “changed their algorithm to benefit Joe Biden” during the general election campaign, rigs results to promote Google’s favored views, and has showered campaign cash on both parties to evade accountability. <\/b><\/p>\n It appears, as I mentioned above, that Goolag has learned nothing after the Fall of the House of Dorsey and the conquest of Twitter by Elon Musk. Brave Software did respond with a semi-believable explanation on why they pushed an old fact check to the top of the list on their site.<\/p>\n Brave Software Head of Communications Catherine Corre told Just the News the old fact-check about Project Veritas showed up high in results because the source, the Poynter Institute, made an “invisible” meta tag update a few days ago, meaning the page “was labeled as ‘fresh'” in Brave’s search engine. It’s fixing the bug, she said. <\/b><\/p>\n “Brave Search is an independent search engine and we do not censor results,” nor does it apply blocks or rules to disfavor content other than child sexual abuse material, Corre said. “We do not prioritize so-called ‘fact checkers’ in any way.” <\/b><\/p>\n The Daily Mail took down its report on the Project Veritas sting apparently within two hours of going live early Thursday morning, according to an archive of the page<\/a> and baffled social media users. The report said it has asked Pfizer for comment. <\/b><\/p>\n I think we can guess what the comment was. \u201cTake down that story or else.\u201d Of course, what goes on the internet stays on the internet. In any case, Pfizer finally responded. Here are those details from RedState<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Now, after days of silence, Pfizer has finally responded. In a lengthy statement<\/a>, the pharmaceutical company, most known for its COVID-19 vaccine, claims it does not perform gain-of-function research.<\/strong><\/p>\n RedState provided the statement. You can read it on RedState or on Pfizer\u2019s site. RedState does try to decipher the response.<\/p>\n There\u2019s a lot of doublespeak and hiding behind language there. While Pfizer insists it performs no gain-of-function research, it goes on to admit that in a \u201climited number of cases,\u201d the company engineers the COVID-19 virus to \u201cenable the assessment of antiviral activity in cells.\u201d\u00a0 That seems like it requires a lot more explanation, does it not? Because it seems to be somewhat in contradiction with their initial claim. <\/b><\/p>\n This is what happens when they bring in a company of lawyers. They live to obfuscate and they obfuscate to make a living.<\/p>\n With that said, it seems pretty clear, at least in my view, that Pfizer isn\u2019t doing what it\u2019s doing because they fear future variants, and with so many people already having been infected, the efficacy of more and more boosters remains in doubt anyway. <\/b><\/p>\n The boosters along with the original vaccines have been pretty much proven to not be anywhere near as effective as was claimed. Now it\u2019s beginning to look like they\u2019re actually dangerous to young and healthy people. There have been to many reports of people simply dropping dead in their tracks of heart failure with no personal history or any history in their families. It\u2019s making people wonder.<\/p>\n COVID-19 vaccines and antivirals are what make Pfizer billions of dollars, and they have every incentive to keep shoving boosters out while insisting they are needed because of \u201cvariants.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n Those variants have been growing weaker and weaker with each iteration. The last \u201cBig one\u201d was the Omicron variant. You had the Biden Maladministration screaming that if you didn\u2019t take a booster we would all die, the world would end and the sun would explode in a supernova. Instead it was no worse than a bad cold.<\/p>\n Their statement isn\u2019t going to convince anyone on the fence. <\/b><\/p>\n It\u2019s obfuscatory and confusing at best, and given Pfizer\u2019s history of misleading the public, there\u2019s no reason to take the company\u2019s word for anything.<\/strong><\/p>\n And no one will. There are already members of Congress sending out letters of inquiry. One is Senator Marco Rubio. Here are some of those details from the Daily Wire<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n