![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/tolerant-liberal.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The most recent assault was at Stanford University when Fifth Circuit appellate judge Kyle Duncan was shouted down by hundreds of left wing idiots and morons who are attending Stanford University Law School. Well, they are about to get a solid smack to the head from judges they need to work with to further their legal careers. Here are the details from the Washington Free Beacon<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n James Ho and Elizabeth Branch, who announced a clerkship boycott of Yale Law last year, are adding Stanford to the list.<\/b><\/p>\n “We will not hire any student who chooses to attend Stanford Law School in the future,” Ho, who sits on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, said\u00a0Saturday evening\u00a0in a speech to the <\/b>Texas Review of Law and Politics<\/b><\/em>, a transcript of which was reviewed by the <\/b>Washington Free Beacon<\/b><\/em>. The clerkship moratorium, like the one on Yale, will exempt current law students. <\/b><\/p>\n Ho’s announcement is the latest and most dramatic effort to hold Stanford accountable for its treatment of Fifth Circuit appellate judge Kyle Duncan, who was shouted down by hundreds of students\u2014and berated by Stanford diversity dean Tirien Steinbach\u2014when he spoke at the law school last month. The students called Duncan “scum,” asked why he couldn’t “find the clit,” and screamed, “We hope your daughters get raped.” <\/b><\/p>\n What a pack of Progressive vermin. By rights, every single one of these violent thugs should be expelled from Stanford. Of course, this is a progressive leftist university and these are progressive liberal students.<\/p>\n Though Steinbach is on leave, Stanford has ruled out disciplining the hecklers, who by Stanford’s own admission violated the school’s free speech policy. <\/b><\/p>\n “Rules aren’t rules without consequences,” Ho said. “And students who practice intolerance don’t belong in the legal profession.” <\/b><\/p>\n Nope, they belong in a window asking if you would like fries with your order.<\/p>\n Calling the disruption an act of “intellectual terrorism,” Ho argued that Duncan’s treatment reflects “rampant” viewpoint discrimination at elite law schools, some of which do not employ a single center-right professor<\/a>. It is no coincidence, Ho said, that the worst free speech incidents have occurred at the law schools with the least intellectual diversity. Though Ho did not say what it would take for him to lift the boycott, he implied that a more politically diverse faculty\u2014and a less ideologically uniform administration\u2014would go a long way. <\/b><\/p>\n “How do we know everyone’s views will be protected,” he asked, “if everyone’s views aren’t represented?” <\/b><\/p>\n Well, that\u2019s not going to happen any time soon. For this to occur, the entire administration of these schools needs to be replaced, preferably with people who have actual spines and who won\u2019t hesitate to bounce some of these idiots out.<\/p>\n “Imagine that every judge who says they’re opposed to discrimination at Yale and Stanford takes the same path,” Ho said. “Imagine they decide that, until the discrimination stops, they will no longer hire from those schools in the future. How quickly do we think those schools would stop discriminating then?” <\/b><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n