{"id":40226,"date":"2023-05-02T08:43:24","date_gmt":"2023-05-02T12:43:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=40226"},"modified":"2023-05-02T08:43:24","modified_gmt":"2023-05-02T12:43:24","slug":"white-house-fighting-back-on-house-testimony-on-biden-laptop","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=40226","title":{"rendered":"White House fighting back on house testimony on Biden laptop"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. The news recently came out that the Biden campaign were the ones who circulated the infamous latter signed by 50 Democrat intelligence officials, all saying that the contents were Russian Disinformation.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Now the Biden Maladministration is fighting back on the news that it was the Biden Campaign that initiated the letter. Here are the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

White House spokesman Ian Sams accused House Judiciary Committee Republicans and Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, of making a “highly misleading selective leak” regarding Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s<\/a> alleged role in discrediting the Hunter Biden laptop story. <\/b><\/p>\n

A selective leak? From what I saw, it was about as \u201cSelective\u201d as a strategic nuclear weapon.<\/p>\n

In a letter sent to Blinken Thursday, Jordan and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner, R-Ohio, revealed testimony from former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell, who said Blinken, then a senior adviser to President Biden’s campaign<\/a>, was “the impetus” of the public statement signed by current and past intelligence officials that claimed the Hunter Biden laptop was part of a Russian disinformation campaign. <\/b><\/p>\n

“We are examining that public statement signed by 51 former intelligence officials that falsely discredited a New York Post story regarding Hunter Biden\u2019s laptop as supposed Russian disinformation,” the Republicans wrote. “As part of our oversight, we have learned that you played a role in the inception of this statement while serving as a Biden campaign advisor, and we therefore request your assistance with our oversight.” <\/b><\/p>\n

Ok, so tell me what\u2019s so selective about this? This sounds like they are flat out accusing Blinken of putting the whole fraudulent letter together in the first place.<\/p>\n

Sams asserted that the Republican letter was “highly misleading,” pointing to additional transcript released by the House Judiciary Committee.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

“Wow. Fuller transcript newly released by @HouseJudiciary reveals this was a highly misleading selective leak by @Jim_Jordan, @RepMikeTurner and @JudiciaryGOP,” Sams tweeted Friday, sharing an excerpt from Morell’s testimony. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The Fox story then goes into a partial transcript of Morrell\u2019s testimony. This wasn\u2019t included in the letter to Blinken. This is what is setting off Ian Sams. Now as I understand it, this testimony wasn\u2019t \u201cSecret\u201d per se and so would be public information. Basically, anyone could look at the transcripts. (If someone has different information, please list this in the comments)<\/p>\n

This whine from Sams sounds like the standard Democrat \u201cOh crap! They found out!\u201d comment. Recall where the Russian Trump Dossier that caused so many problems for the Greatest President of the 21st<\/sup> Century, Donald Trump. It was opposition research paid for by Felonia von Pantsuit. The \u201cUsual suspects\u201d on the left tried denying this as well, using their tools in the Democrat Propaganda Corps to try and discredit the truth. That failed, and so will this.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The Biden Laptop, the data on it and how it was handled by the FBI looks like it\u2019s becoming another Watergate scandal. Where, under Nixon, we had some idiots doing really dumb things and getting caught, here we have what appears to be flat out corruption and an attempt to suppress the truth. Who knows where this will eventually lead to.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (2<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n