{"id":40607,"date":"2023-06-17T09:54:26","date_gmt":"2023-06-17T13:54:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=40607"},"modified":"2023-06-17T09:54:26","modified_gmt":"2023-06-17T13:54:26","slug":"biden-may-have-solicited-a-bribe-not-just-accepted-one","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=40607","title":{"rendered":"Biden may have solicited a bribe, not just accepted one"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Things are getting even more interesting with regards to the Biden Crime Family and their conspiracy to sell access to \u201cThe Big Guy.\u201d It now looks like that Joe Biden didn\u2019t just accept a bribe, allegedly, but may have solicited it from Burisma.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

If you have been following this, then you know that the DoJ and FBI have been covering up for the Biden Crime Family for years now. The reasons are extensive of course and is being looked into. It now looks like that the FBI may have had information that the Bidens actively solicited bribes, not just accepted them when they were offered. Here are the details from the Federalist<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

The Bidens allegedly \u201ccoerced\u201d a foreign national to pay them $10 million in bribes, according to individuals familiar with the investigation into the FBI\u2019s handling of the FD-1023 confidential human source report. What, if anything, agents did to investigate these explosive claims remains unknown, however, with sources telling The Federalist the FBI continues to stonewall. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The actions of the FBI over the last 10 years or so, (We can talk about the rest of the alphabet soup of federal law enforcement agencies another time), have been growing more and more corrupt. The culmination was the surprise win of the Greatest President of the 21st<\/sup> Century, Donald Trump, over the anointed successor of Barack Obama, Felonia von Pantsuit. The FBI did everything they could to bury the criminal activities of Felonia while trying to keep candidate Trump from winning. We know how that turned out.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

On Monday, Sen. Chuck Grassley\u00a0revealed<\/a>\u00a0a foreign national \u2014 identified by individuals with knowledge of the matter as Burisma founder Mykola Zlochevsky \u2014 allegedly possessed 17 recordings implicating the Bidens in a pay-to-play scandal. While 15 of the audio recordings consisted of phone calls between Zlochevsky and Hunter Biden, two were of calls the Ukrainian had with then-Vice President Joe Biden, according to the FD-1023. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The Federalist has now learned the FD-1023 reported the CHS saying the Bidens \u201ccoerced\u201d Zlochevsky to pay the bribes. Sources familiar with the investigation also explained the context of Zlochevsky\u2019s statements, and that context further bolsters the CHS\u2019s reporting. <\/b><\/p>\n

That changes things in a big way if true and explains why the Biden\/Garland DoJ is working overtime to suppress the evidence. If it\u2019s shown that Joe Biden not only sold his office, but extorted money from Burisma, he\u2019s done, and so is Garland, Wray, the FBI and the DoJ.<\/p>\n

In the FD-1023 from June 30, 2020, the confidential human source summarized earlier meetings he had with Zlochevsky. According to the CHS, in the 2015-2016 timeframe, the CHS, who was providing advice to Zlochevsky, told the Burisma owner to stay away from the Bidens. Then, after Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential contest, the CHS asked Zlochevsky if he was upset Trump won.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

I think we can assume that, yes, he was upset.<\/p>\n

Zlochevsky allegedly told the CHS he was dismayed by Trump\u2019s victory, fearing an investigation would reveal his payments to the Biden family, which included a $5 million payment to Hunter Biden and a $5 million payment to Joe Biden. According to the CHS, the Burisma executive bemoaned the situation, claiming the Bidens had \u201ccoerced\u201d him into paying the bribes.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

This is where things get real. If there is hard evidence that Joe Biden basically extorted money from Burisma, he\u2019s done. Even the Democrats won\u2019t be able to save him. If it turns out that the DoJ and FBI had this evidence and sat on it? Say goodbye to the FBI shows currently on TV, followed shortly by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.<\/p>\n

The CHS responded that he hoped Zlochevsky had taken precautions to protect himself. Zlochevsky then allegedly detailed the steps he had taken to avoid detection, stressing he had never paid the \u201cBig Guy\u201d directly and that it would take some 10 years to unravel the various money trails. It was only then that Zlochevsky mentioned the audio recordings he had made of the conversations he had with Hunter and Joe Biden, according to the CHS. <\/b><\/p>\n

This is called \u201cCovering your ass\u201d and is used by conspirators who don\u2019t trust each other. Basically, Zlochevsk wanted to have something to trade in case he got busted.<\/p>\n

Further, according to individuals familiar with the investigation, the FBI admitted the CHS\u2019s intel was unrelated to the information Rudy Giuliani had provided the Western District of Pennsylvania\u2019s U.S. attorney\u2019s office \u2014 the office then-Attorney General William Barr had tasked with reviewing any new information related to Ukraine.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

Recently, Barr \u201cCame out of the closet\u201d and demonstrated he was just another Deep State operative planted in the Trump administration. It\u2019s beginning to look like he had a fair amount of information and evidence to take both Biden\u2019s to a grand jury, (In my completely amateurish, inexpert opinion), and have them both charged. I\u2019m beginning to think that the next Republican administration, be it Trump or DeSantis, (Forget about the Pence administration. No one outside of the Beltway likes or trusts him) is going to be going after all these senior people like Barr, Wray and Garland.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Sources told The Federalist that investigators out of the Pittsburgh office, in addition to reviewing Giuliani\u2019s information, searched internal FBI databases and came across an earlier FD-1023 related to the CHS. That earlier FD-1023 then led to agents questioning the CHS on June 30, 2020, uncovering the details concerning Burisma\u2019s alleged bribery of the Bidens.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

That was before the Democrat National Convention. At best, the DNC could have been told what was found and flushed Biden as their nominee and brought in another easily manipulated idiot. It is possible that Barr may have thought that Biden was going to lose, and didn\u2019t know or consider how vast the election fraud would be. (Or turned a blind eye to it) There is also the possibility that he wanted Trump out of office.<\/p>\n

What the FBI did to investigate the allegations is unknown, with sources telling The Federalist the bureau refused to either confirm or deny that the DOJ under Barr sent the FD-1023 to Delaware for further investigation. <\/b><\/p>\n

From what I can tell, they won\u2019t even tell the oversight committees.<\/p>\n

On the contrary, the FBI allowed Rep. Jamie Raskin, ranking member on the House Oversight Committee, to falsely represent to Americans that Barr and Pittsburgh U.S. Attorney Scott Brady had closed the investigation. Raskin\u2019s deceit, tolerated by the FBI, forced Barr to publicly correct the record<\/a>.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

Raskin is working his way up to Schiffhead levels of dishonesty, and he\u2019s being called on it by the Republicans.<\/p>\n

The FBI is also refusing to provide any information on what, if any, steps it took to investigate the detailed claims contained in the FD-1023. <\/b><\/p>\n

The answer to that is simple. They took little to know action at all.<\/p>\n

There is also no independent confirmation from Delaware indicating any investigative steps were taken regarding the FD-1023. Agents in Delaware \u201ccould have sat on it,\u201d according to one individual familiar with the investigation. <\/b><\/p>\n

And this, along with a host of other things, is why the FBI is looking at being defunded in the next budget. There is no indication that they even looked into the allegations that the former Vice President of the United States sold his office, actually, it now appears he used his office to extort bribes from Burisma. Considering Felonia von Pantsuit\u2019s \u201cClinton Foundation\u201d and how many large foreign donors seem to have gone to the top of the pile when it came to requests to the State Department for assistance, I think the entire Obama regime may have had their hands in the til. I wonder if one of those pallets of cash Obama sent to Iran might have been a little light?<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Thankfully, the House went to the Republicans in 2022, if barely. I have no doubt at all that if the Democrats maintained control, there would be no investigation. We are already seeing that the Democrats are circling the wagons. The Democratic Propaganda Corps, formally known as the Main Stream Media is, with a very few exceptions, refusing to cover the story.<\/p>\n

The recent indictment of the Greatest President of the 21st<\/sup> Century, Donald Trump, on bogus charges right after the news came out that the FBI was finally caving in and providing some of the information the oversight committee wanted reeks to high heaven of trying to redirect attention from Joe Biden\u2019s corruption. The Media has been running nothing but stories about President Trump and generally nothing about Joe Biden.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

It\u2019s obvious why they won\u2019t cover the story unless dragged kicking and screaming into it. The MSM has done nothing but protect the Biden\u2019s for years, and actively aided in destroying anyone who might have had questions about the veracity of the 2020 election. Now we have information on just how corrupt the entire Biden family is.<\/p>\n

The question now is, what will the Democrats do if\/when the House impeaches Biden and provides enough evidence to get him convicted in a court of law to the Senate? Will they finally admit they made a mistake and remove him, or will they double down on stupid and continue to protect him?<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (3<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n

\u00a0