{"id":41140,"date":"2023-09-05T06:15:21","date_gmt":"2023-09-05T10:15:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=41140"},"modified":"2023-09-05T06:15:21","modified_gmt":"2023-09-05T10:15:21","slug":"of-course-biden-is-not-pushing-to-jail-president-trump-hes-not-joking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=41140","title":{"rendered":"Of course Biden is not pushing to jail President Trump. He\u2019s not joking!"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. With the exception of the hard core morons infesting the Democrat Party, most people who look at all the indictments against the Greatest President of the 21st<\/sup> Century, Donald Trump, and understand that they are political with the intent of keeping President Trump out of the White House.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Dementia Joe Biden, the Pedophile in Chief, has denied any interactions with the DoJ or Jack Villefort Smith. (Jack Smith is being renamed from Javert to Villefort after the corrupt prosecutor in the Count of Monte Christo<\/a>, G\u00e9rard de Villefort) However, it appears that once again, the most corrupt president* in American history is lying. Here are the details from the New York Post<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

The White House counsel\u2019s office met with a top aide to Special Counsel Jack Smith just weeks before he brought charges against former President Trump for allegedly mishandling classified documents<\/a> \u2014 raising serious concerns about coordinated legal efforts aimed at President Biden\u2019s likely opponent in 2024. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Jay Bratt, who joined the special counsel team in November 2022, shortly after it was formed, took a meeting in the White House on March 31, 2023, with Caroline Saba, deputy chief of staff for the White House counsel\u2019s office, White House visitor logs show. They were joined in the 10 a.m. meeting by Danielle Ray, an FBI agent in the Washington field office. <\/b><\/p>\n

Nine weeks later, Trump was indicted <\/a>by Smith\u2019s office on June 8, 2023. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Bratt, 63, also met with Saba at the White House in November 2021, when Trump was mired in negotiations with the National Archives, who were demanding the return of presidential records from his Mar-a-Lago estate before a formal investigation had not yet been opened. <\/b><\/p>\n

This is something that many, (Including myself, mea culpa), had forgotten. President Trump was sending documents to the National Archives and was talking with them about others. The new archivist, who hates President Trump, sicced the FBI on him. There are also reports that prior to the raid, there was information on Biden\u2019s possession of classified materials going back decades that he flat out had no right to have in the first place and they needed to get the spotlight off him.<\/p>\n

Bratt had a third meeting in the White House in September 2021, this time with Katherine Reily, an advisor to the White House chief of staff\u2019s office. The logs offer no information about what was discussed at the meetings. <\/b><\/p>\n

Of course they didn\u2019t put down why they were meeting. The last thing they wanted was an official record of their conspiracy to violate the constitutional rights of President Trump and everyone who supports him.<\/p>\n

Critics and legal experts questioned why Bratt was taking meetings at all with the White House counsel\u2019s office while part of an active investigation into President Biden\u2019s likely 2024 Republican opponent. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cThere is no legitimate purpose for a line [DOJ] guy to be meeting with the White House except if it\u2019s coordinated by the highest levels,\u201d said former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a one-time top federal prosecutor in the Southern District. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley said the March meeting was particularly troublesome and \u201craises obvious concerns about visits to the White House after [Bratt] began his work with the special counsel.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cThere is no reason why the Justice Department should not be able to confirm whether this meeting was related to the ongoing investigation or concerns some other matter,\u201d he said. <\/b><\/p>\n

I beg to differ. There is every reason to not confirm that this meeting was part of the Biden Maladministrations plans to \u201cGet Trump!<\/p>\n

Bratt, a Harvard-educated attorney, is a longtime Department of Justice hand and has served as chief of its counterintelligence and export control section in the national security division since October 2018. <\/b><\/p>\n

In this capacity, Bratt visited Mar-a-Lago <\/a>in June 2022 to inspect storage facilities at the property and personally interacted with Trump. <\/b><\/p>\n

As I understand it, the only issue they had with the SCIF that contained all the documents were some of the locks. Those were replaced per the recommendation. Other wise, the SCIF was monitored by closed circuit cameras 24\/7 and there were armed federal agents on site at all times.<\/p>\n

Compare that with Dementia Joe\u2019s handling of classified documents. He had those scattered all up and down the Eastern Seaboard in unsecured locations that were easily accessible. Then there is the question regarding classifications. President Trump, as president, had absolute authority to declassify anything. Biden had no authority to even have a lot of the documents they found in his possession.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

He, <\/b>(Bratt),<\/b> later became a leading advocate for the unannounced FBI raid of the property in August of that year, the Washington Post reported<\/a>. <\/b><\/p>\n

Gee, why am I not surprised?<\/p>\n

Stanley Woodward, a lawyer for Trump\u2019s valet, Walt Nauta \u2014 who has also been charged by the special counsel\u2019s office \u2014 accused Bratt in June of trying to coerce his client\u2019s cooperation by floating Woodward\u2019s past application to be a judge. <\/b><\/p>\n

In a sealed filing obtained by The Guardian,<\/a> Woodward alleged that Bratt floated his past judicial application to suggest it might be looked at more favorably if his client were to cooperate with the government against Trump. <\/b><\/p>\n

It does look like we have some serious ethical and legal breaches by the \u201cMost Ethical and Competent Administration in World history\u201d doesn\u2019t it? That must be a simple mistake and easily corrected. There is no way that Joe Biden and the White House would do anything like coordinate a legal assault on a political opponent.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Bratt is not the only Department of Justice connection to a Trump indictment. <\/b><\/p>\n

Another longtime Department of Justice official, Matthew Colangelo<\/a> \u2014 freshly hired in December 2022 <\/a>into the office of Manhattan\u2019s far-left District Attorney Alvin Bragg \u2014\u00a0also played a critical role in Trump\u2019s indictment in New York City for alleged hush money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Representative Jim Jordan has announced that his committee will be looking into the RICO indictment by Fulton County Soros DA Fani Fat Ass Willis. He wants to know how much, if any, federal resources were used in this joke of an indictment. (Among all the issues with it, there is no underlying crime) I suspect he will also be adding Bratt to the list of people he will be raking over the coals.<\/p>\n

The stench of corruption coming out of the White House is unrivaled in American History. I think it blows past Watergate, makes the Teapot Dome scandal look like a minor indiscretion and even the scandals of the Grant administration don\u2019t compare. The one big difference is the actions by the Biden Maladministration actually trying to railroad a political opponent into jail on fake charges. That is the biggest difference between the Democrats and Biden.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

All the other scandals were about money. Even Nixon never considered throwing his opponent into prison to keep him from winning. (McGovern never really had a chance) With Biden and the Democrats, it\u2019s all about absolute power. They want it and will literally do anything to get it. (Once they have it, then they use it to enrich themselves) If President Trump returns to the White House, he will go after all those who did him wrong. Now you can see why there is so much collusion between the White House and the various prosecutors they\u2019re using to Get Trump.<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (4<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n

\u00a0