![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Trump-Offends.jpeg?ssl=1\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Now the Democrats are looking to pass a bill that will ban Trump from office using the decision as a guide. Here are the details from MediaIte<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Rep. <\/b>Jamie Raskin<\/b><\/strong> (D-MD) argued that the U.S. Supreme Court passed the buck Monday by ruling that it\u2019s up to Congress to enforce the 14th Amendment that would ban <\/b>Donald Trump<\/b><\/strong> from ever holding office again. <\/b><\/p>\n Passing the buck? No, the courts told you that this is you job.<\/p>\n Raskin told CNN\u2019s <\/b>Dana Bash<\/b><\/strong> that House Democrats plan to do just that, and he\u2019s leading the effort to bring the 14th Amendment argument to the House floor. <\/b><\/p>\n Raskin has been pushing this for a while now. Dana Bash played a video of this jerk from last summer. In it Raskin said:<\/p>\n We\u2019ve been saying all along that section three of the 14th Amendment presents a clear and unequivocal statement that anyone who has sworn an oath of office \u2014 and, by the way, not just a president but members of Congress and others who hold federal office \u2014 who engage in insurrection or rebellion, having sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution against enemies foreign and domestic can never serve again in federal or state office\u2026Donald Trump is disqualified. <\/b><\/p>\n Raskin is another Adam Schiffhead. He is a liar, a fraud and a phony. He\u2019s also a typical Progressive Liberal Democrat, in other words, a smooth brain short term thinker. He has no conception of what is going on in what the Left refers to as Flyover Country. Now that the Supreme Court has ruled on the states trying to rig the election by banning the probable GOP nominee, (They said Hell No!), Raskin is going to double down on stupid.<\/p>\n Bash asked, \u201cSo, Congressman, now that you\u2019ve read the Supreme Court decision, which effectively says that they don\u2019t agree with that argument, what\u2019s your response?\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cWell, the Court didn\u2019t exactly disagree with it, they just said that they\u2019re not the ones to figure it out,\u201d Raskin said. \u201cIt\u2019s not going to be a matter for judicial resolution under section three of the 14th Amendment, but it\u2019s up to Congress to enforce it.\u201d He continued: <\/b><\/p>\n I disagree with that interpretation just because the other parts of the 14th Amendment are self-executing. People can go to court and say that something violates equal protection even if there\u2019s not a federal statute that allows them to do that. But in any event, the Supreme Court punted and said it\u2019s up to Congress to act. <\/b><\/p>\n And so I am working with a number of my colleagues, including <\/b>Debbie Wasserman Schultz<\/b><\/strong> and <\/b>Eric Swalwell<\/b><\/strong>, to revive legislation that we had to set up a process by which we could determine that someone who committed insurrection is disqualified by section three of the 14th Amendment.<\/b><\/p>\n And the House of Representatives already impeached Donald Trump for participating in insurrection by inciting it. So the House has already pronounced upon that, and there was also a 57 to 43 vote in the Senate. The question is whether Speaker <\/b>Mike Johnson<\/b><\/strong> would allow us to bring this to the floor of the House.<\/b><\/p>\n The answer to that is No. In a story on Fox News, Speaker Johnson basically asked if the Democrats were smoking Crack<\/a>.<\/p>\n House Speaker Mike Johnson<\/a>, R-La., slammed reports that Democrats are ginning up legislation in reaction to the Supreme Court\u2019s decision Monday to keep former President Donald Trump off the 2024 ballot.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n According to a report published in Axios Monday, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a former member of the\u00a0Jan. 6 select committee, said he is already crafting federal legislation that would force Trump off the ballot.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n I tracked down the story and it\u2019s not all that detailed, which is why I went with the Mediaite story<\/a> instead.<\/p>\n A spokesperson for Speaker Johnson told Fox News Digital on Monday night that his Democrat colleagues should “get a grip.”\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n “Democrats need to get a grip. In this country, the American people decide the next president\u2014not the courts and not the Congress,” the spokesperson said.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n That\u2019s not how things work for Democrats. They will decide who you will be permitted to vote for.<\/p>\n According to the Axios report, Raskin referenced legislation he introduced in 2022 with Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla. that would allow the Justice Department to sue to keep candidates off the ballot under the 14th Amendment.<\/p>\n “We are going to revise it in light of the Supreme Court’s decision,” Raskin told the outlet. He suggested that the bill would be paired with a resolution declaring Jan. 6 an “insurrection” and that those involved “engaged in insurrection.” <\/b><\/p>\n And that is unconstitutional. The constitution is quite specific on who can run for president. You can\u2019t use the civil courts to block someone who is running for elective federal office. The only way is through criminal charges and President Trump has not been charged, let alone convicted of an insurrection.<\/p>\n Then there is the entire insurrection business. What happened January 6th<\/sup> was not an insurrection. Here is the definition of Insurrection the Merriam-Webster online dictionary<\/a>:<\/p>\n revolt<\/a> and insurrection<\/a> imply an armed uprising that quickly fails or succeeds. <\/b><\/p>\n What happened January 6th<\/sup> was not an armed revolt. None of the protesters, other then the undercover federal agents provocateurs, were armed. If this had been an actual armed insurrection, Raskin and Wasserman Schultz, along with most of the rest in Congress would have been hanged from the lamp posts.<\/p>\n Raskin\u2019s bill is not going to the floor for a vote. I will be surprised if it even gets out of whatever committee reviews it. All this does is show just how evil and tyrannical the Democrat Party truly is. They so hate the Greatest President of the 21st<\/sup> Century, Donald Trump, that they are perfectly willing to tear up the Constitution, the Rule of law and risk an outright shooting civil war.<\/p>\n I think that someone needs to ask Raskin if that is his goal. Do you want to start a hot civil war? I certainly don\u2019t want one. Unlike those smooth brain short term thinkers in the Democrat Party, I understand just how bad it will be. Raskin and the Democrats might actually want to trigger one thinking they will win this time. That is a terrifying thought.<\/p>\n Thatisall<\/p>\n ~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Good day all. As expected, the Progressive Liberal Democrats are freaking out that the President Trump is going to win the election. They had hoped that the Court would say that yes, States can ban Trump. The recent Supreme Court … Continue reading <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n (4<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n