![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Donald-Trump.jpg?ssl=1\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
One of these tools is having a voter present a valid ID to prove that they are who they say they are and that they are actually registered to vote in that location. Since the Democrats love to drive people around to different polling stations in different states, having to present a valid ID presents a problem for them.<\/p>\n
Add to this the cleaning voter rolls of people who have moved out of the district or states, or who have died and you can see why the Democrats are worried. They generally can\u2019t win an honest election. But, Democrats have a way to \u201cFix\u201d this problem, and it\u2019s the most corrupt Attorney General in American History, Merrick Garland. Here are the details from mrcTV<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Leading up to November\u2019s elections, U.S. Attorney General is vowing to wage lawfare against election security measures and to prosecute perceived \u201cthreats\u201d by those who speak out strongly against election fraud. <\/b><\/p>\n AG Merrick likened election security laws to the police brutality 59 years earlier against civil rights demonstrators in Selma, Alabama in his remarks at a Selma church service<\/a> on Sunday: <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cCourt decisions in recent years have drastically weakened the protections of the Voting Rights Act that marchers on the Edmund Pettus Bridge bled for 59 years ago. <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cAnd since those decisions, there has been a dramatic increase in legislative measures that make it harder for millions of eligible voters to vote and to elect the representatives of their choice.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n They were \u201cWeakened\u201d because they were blatantly unconstitutional. They were also out of date.<\/p>\n Garland boasted that he has doubled the numbers of lawyers to challenge state and local measures employed to ensure the integrity of ballots and verify the identity of those who try to vote: <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cThat is why, one of the first things I did as Attorney General was to double the number of lawyers in the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division. <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cThat is why we are challenging efforts by states and jurisdictions to implement discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary restrictions on access to the ballot, including those related to mail-in voting, the use of drop boxes, and voter ID requirements.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n In other words, Garland intends to use the DoJ as a tool to aid the Democrats in stealing the 2024 election.<\/p>\n But, the U.S. attorney general didn\u2019t stop there. <\/b><\/p>\n Of course he didn\u2019t.<\/p>\n Garland said that has a task force that will prosecute those it believes are threatening election workers and officials: <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cToday, threats to the right to vote have expanded to target not just the voters themselves, but the citizens we rely on to fairly administer voting. Not just elected officials, not just paid administrators, but also the local volunteers who ensure that voting is available in every precinct.<\/b><\/p>\n \u201cThat is why I launched the Justice Department\u2019s Election Threats Task Force to combat threats against election workers.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n Garland makes it sound like that huge numbers of poll workers were threatened and attacked. That doesn\u2019t seem to be the case.<\/p>\n Garland cited two isolated instances of individuals charged with making violent threats, one in 2020<\/a> and one in 2022<\/a>. In one case, an Indiana man pleaded guilty to one count of making a threatening interstate communication to an election worker in Michigan. In the other, a California man was recently charged with allegedly leaving a voicemail containing a violent threat on the personal cell phone of an election official in the Maricopa County, Arizona in 2022. <\/b><\/p>\n Making threats is exactly the wrong thing to do. However, these were just a pair of one off\u2019s and were handled per the law, or so I am assuming. (With the Feds these days, you never know) The problem now is what is Garland and his thugs actually planning?<\/p>\n While actual violence was allegedly threatened in both of Garland\u2019s examples, his remarks suggest his task force may prosecute any perceived \u201cthreat.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n A \u201cPerceived\u201d threat? Just what is that? There is either an actual threat or there isn\u2019t.<\/p>\n If one party\u2019s poll watchers try to force their way back into a place where they\u2019ve been locked out by ballot counters of another party, is that a \u201cthreat\u201d? <\/b><\/p>\n That\u2019s an interesting question. Generally, you can\u2019t throw out poll watchers unless the entire site is closing down and being locked\/secured. There will be no one inside. We saw what happened in a few states during the Tainted Election of 2020 where the \u201cOfficials\u201d ordered everyone out and then started pulling ballots out that no one could observe or account for. (I think one of these was Fulton County) In other areas, the officials covered the windows so no one could monitor their actions.<\/p>\n If monitors are unlawfully blocked from doing their jobs, and they force their way back in to make sure the vote count is honest, but otherwise not interfering, is Garland going to send out his goons? I suspect the answer to that is \u201cOh Hell Yes!\u201d<\/p>\n Likewise, many liberals today claim that those who voice opposition to their views are guilty of \u201chate speech\u201d threats \u2013 such as when LGBTQ activists call it \u201cviolence\u201d to speak out against transgender ideology. <\/b><\/p>\n The alphabet soup of pervs, mentally ill, pedos and groomers don\u2019t like being called on their actions, especially when it interferes with their plans to do \u201cthings\u201d to children. I can see that scumbag Garland going after parents and others who are trying to protect their children as well as other children from the predators out there.<\/p>\n What I think Garland has planned is to force the DoJ and Federal Agents into polling locations and intimidating both voters and those monitoring the vote and the count. I could actually see the Feds actually ordering the poll monitors out. That, of course, would go over like a lead balloon and most states.<\/p>\n Now, why is this petty, jackbooted thug so hot on threatening people? I think the reason is rather simple.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n