{"id":45749,"date":"2025-10-13T09:03:19","date_gmt":"2025-10-13T13:03:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=45749"},"modified":"2025-10-13T09:03:19","modified_gmt":"2025-10-13T13:03:19","slug":"ny-slimes-once-again-publishes-fake-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=45749","title":{"rendered":"NY Slimes once again publishes fake news"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Recently, Ryan Routh was convicted in Federal court<\/a> for the attempted assassination of President Trump. This was, of course, a major news event. It was also fully expected considering the evidence against Routh and the fact that the idiot decided to represent himself. All the legacy media were ready to go when the verdict came in.<\/p>\n


\n<\/p>\n

However, the New York Times<\/i><\/span> Slimes manage to pull a full blown \u201cDewey Defeats Truman!\u201d moment. They published a story that Routh had been acquitted. Here are the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

Would-be Trump assassin Ryan Routh was declared guilty on Tuesday, September 24th<\/sup>, on all charges, but The New York Times accidentally published the wrong article. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

In journalism, outlets often pre-write obituaries, election outcomes and potential court verdicts of major cases before they occur, using the basic facts of the story and adding whatever key details are essential on the day of.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

Which, of course, makes sense. It saves time having a significant part of the story prewritten using the facts already available.<\/p>\n

However, a screenshot indicated that the New York Times accidentally published a headline, “Man Found Not Guilty of Trying to Assassinate Trump in Florida.” The lede of the now-scrubbed article added, “In a surprise verdict, a federal jury acquitted Ryan Routh of attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate last year. The screenshot also indicated that the article would be published in the print edition on Sept. 24, 2025.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Why they even had that headline available indicates to me that someone at the Slimes was hoping that criminal was going to get away with it. With all the information, evidence and testimony, only a Stage 4 TDS sufferer could think Routh was going to walk.<\/p>\n

Podcast host and Fox News contributor Mary Katharine Ham posted the screenshot and wrote, “Just searched Ryan Routh’s name @nytimes and got this result in the first head and subhead. I get it y’all have some kind of prewrite, but why is it preloaded? Routh was just convicted on all charges. Let’s make sure that’s the print edition tomorrow.” <\/b><\/p>\n

\n

Just searched Ryan Routh’s name @nytimes<\/a> and got this result in the first head and subhead. I get it y’all have some kind of prewrite, but why is it preloaded? Routh was just convicted on all charges. Let’s make sure that’s the print edition tomorrow. pic.twitter.com\/JfVi05ZrDk<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Mary Katharine Ham (@mkhammer) September 23, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n