{"id":45763,"date":"2025-10-11T07:56:42","date_gmt":"2025-10-11T11:56:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=45763"},"modified":"2025-10-11T07:56:42","modified_gmt":"2025-10-11T11:56:42","slug":"google-confesses-that-they-were-censoring-conservatives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=45763","title":{"rendered":"Google confesses that they were censoring conservatives"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. For the last 7+ years, and probably for a great deal longer, we have had people complaining that they were being banned, blocked, downgraded, banned and otherwise censored by Google and its various products.<\/p>\n


\n<\/p>\n

This really ramped up under the Biden Maladministration, and was partially confirmed when Elon Musk bought Twitter. He discovered just how deep the hooks of the Federal Government were in Twitter. He had this documented in what came to be known as \u201cThe Twitter Files.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Now Google has finally admitted that they too were actively censoring anyone who went against the Communist Manifesto<\/i><\/span> Biden Administration and the Democrat Party especially when it came to Covid-19 and the Great Panicdemic of 2020. Here are the details from the Federalist<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

Following an investigation and subpoenas from the House Judiciary Committee, Alphabet \u2014 the parent company of Google\u00a0and YouTube \u2014 admitted to censoring conservative voices\u00a0and claimed Biden administration officials pressured it to silence expression online. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

However, the company offered no compensation for the damages inevitably wrought on the voices they suppressed.<\/b><\/p>\n

Oh Really? I know that Google has a bunch of lawyers, but their actions have cost people their very livelihoods and reputations. That they were also aiding and abetting in blatant civil right violations can\u2019t go unpunished. At the very least, they need to lose their Section 230 protections.<\/p>\n

In a statement of facts letter<\/a> from company counsel Daniel F. Donovan to Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, Alphabet and YouTube (collectively \u201cthe company\u201d) committed to reinstating users whose accounts were terminated from YouTube for supposedly violating \u201cCOVID-19 and election integrity policies that are no longer in effect.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

I was watching a YouTube podcast and one of the participants, who has several channels I believe, (None I watch due to lack of interest), mentioned that his YouTube dashboard was suddenly showing all the New User data someone would see if they were setting up a new channel. Shortly after he said that, the news came out regarding Google\u2019s restoring of previously deleted or suspended accounts\/channels.<\/p>\n

The company also claimed YouTube, which is owned by Google, \u201cvalues conservative voices,\u201d despite its deeply stained record of\u00a0censoring<\/a>,\u00a0suspending<\/a>, \u201ccontextualizing<\/a>,\u201d and\u00a0kicking<\/a>\u00a0such conservative voices off the platform. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The letter did not offer any plans for compensation for individuals who were deplatformed or demonetized under YouTube\u2019s former content policies.\u00a0\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

I can tell you what those plans are. They aren\u2019t going to do anything to compensate the people they harmed. I think it one reason is the cost. Some of those channels were pulling in a huge amount of revenue and had millions of people watching them. Even if the channels are being reinstated, all those subscribers and viewers are gone now and likely won\u2019t be returning. If Google were to compensate people for deplatforming them, it would cost them 10\u2019s of billions of dollars.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The letter discussed changes to Covid-19 policies over time on the YouTube platform, and admitted that, though \u201creliance on health authorities in this context was well-intentioned, the Company recognizes that it should never come at the expense of public debate on these important issues.\u201d (Notably, during the pandemic, the platform suppressed<\/a> or threatened<\/a> viewpoints challenging prominent narratives on masks, vaccines, and public health figures like Dr. Anthony Fauci<\/a>.) <\/b><\/p>\n

Well intentioned? The only reason Fauci isn\u2019t locked up right now for his crimes was his being a recipient of one of the Biden Autopen pardons. The simple fact is, the people running and working inside Alphabet supported everything that Biden, the Democrat Party and the Deep State was doing. They saw no reason to push back or do anything to protect opinions questioning everything the maladministration was doing.<\/p>\n

The letter also claims that senior Biden administration officials \u201cconducted repeated and sustained outreach to Alphabet and pressed the Company regarding certain user-generated content related to the COVID-19 pandemic that did not violate its policies\u201d and pressured \u201cthe Company to remove non-violative user-generated content.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

Again, you could have just said no. You didn\u2019t because you agreed with everything that the Democrats and Deep State wanted. All you had to say was \u201cNo.\u201d You didn\u2019t and that\u2019s why you need to get it right in the back of the virtual head in a court of law.<\/p>\n

The letter adds that administration officials, \u201cincluding President Biden, created a political atmosphere that sought to influence the actions of platforms based on their concerns regarding misinformation,\u201d actions Alphabet and YouTube suggest are \u201cunacceptable and wrong.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The company indicated that it \u201cconsistently fought against those efforts on First Amendment grounds,\u201d despite countless<\/a> contemporary examples of YouTube censoring critics of the Biden regime, such as lawmakers discussing<\/a> constitutional limits to Covid vaccine mandates, or even livestream<\/a> footage showcasing how Big Tech meddled in the 2020 election. <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Google is trying to hid behind the Biden Maladministration and the European Union\u2019s orders to censor anything that went against the government\u2019s, (US and EU), messaging. The problem with this is what happened after Elon Musk bought Twitter. When the Administration\u2019s censorship people called in to tell Twitter to pull some tweets and kick people off the platform, Musk told them to \u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

As The Federalist\u2019s CEO Sean Davis pointed out, Alphabet and Google\u2019s apparent attempts to deflect are not enough. Finger-pointing at the government and hiding behind the \u201cunprecedented\u201d nature of Covid,<\/b> <\/b>vague \u201ccommitments\u201d to free expression, or \u201cevolving\u201d company policies, do not right the wrongs of silencing American voices.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cGoogle owes us all damages for what their censorship cost us,\u201d Davis wrote on X in response to the statement of facts letter. \u201cA quick \u2018we\u2019re sorry\u2019 now that they\u2019re in trouble isn\u2019t going to cut. Their censorship cost us millions.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

\n

Google owes us all damages for what their censorship cost us. A quick \u201cwe\u2019re sorry\u201d now that they\u2019re in trouble isn\u2019t going to cut. Their censorship cost us millions. https:\/\/t.co\/UcWUvc23dL<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Sean Davis (@seanmdav) September 23, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n