{"id":47105,"date":"2026-06-06T12:47:05","date_gmt":"2026-06-06T16:47:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=47105"},"modified":"2026-06-06T12:47:05","modified_gmt":"2026-06-06T16:47:05","slug":"once-again-ketanji-brown-jackson-shows-that-she-is-unfit-to-be-a-judge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=47105","title":{"rendered":"Once again, Ketanji Brown Jackson, shows that she is unfit to be a judge"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is the most incompetent Supreme Court justice that has ever been appointed and confirmed. She is also blindingly stupid.<\/p>\n


\n<\/p>\n

Recently, KBJ, or as she is more commonly known as, Biden\u2019s SCOTUS DEI hire, has managed to piss off everyone else on the Court, including the other two Democrats. Now she has decided that lower court judges should ignore the Supreme Court. Here are the details from the Federalist<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said it\u2019s \u201cabsolutely a legitimate question\u201d as to whether lower court judges should defy the Supreme Court when it comes to emergency docket decisions.<\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

No you moron, it isn\u2019t, but then you don\u2019t consider the law or the Constitution of the United States to be binding either when your \u201cFeelz\u201d are involved.<\/p>\n

U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel of the District of South Carolina was interviewing Jackson at the American Law Institute earlier this month when he said: \u201cI have found, as a district judge, it mystifying at times, where an emergency docket decision of maybe just two or three pages, appears to countermand longstanding Supreme Court precedent. Are we to apply the brief, the short stay decision, or denial of stay? Or are we to follow 50 years of precedent? It\u2019s a perplexing thing to do.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

I can see why Gergel is confused. He\u2019s an Obama judge and they are generally all easily confused. Speaking of easily confused.<\/p>\n

Jackson said<\/a> it is \u201cabsolutely a legitimate question and a legitimate concern.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n

No, it isn\u2019t.<\/p>\n

\u201cI mean, what is a lower court judge to do after the Supreme Court has intervened early on to tell everyone who\u2019s likely to win the case?\u201d Jackson continued, later adding it\u2019s \u201cmystifying\u201d that the Supreme Court could stay a decision even after a lower court judge \u201cmade findings of fact\u201d or held hearings.<\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

What is so tough to understand? The Supreme Court is THE Supreme Court. All the lower courts are just that. Lower\/inferior courts. Those courts can be abolished at any time by Congress. When the Supreme Court issues a ruling, the inferior courts are bound to uphold it. Now if there is case with new information that can cause SCOTUS to reverse itself, then yes, lower courts can rule in a way that goes against the precedent. Usually, when this happens, a stay is put in place so that the appeals process can proceed.<\/p>\n

Jackson\u2019s comments are especially insane given that there is nothing new about lower courts being bound by the Supreme Court\u2019s guidance (including an emergency order). But this wasn\u2019t the only time Jackson was seemingly unaware how the court she sits on works.<\/b><\/p>\n

Insert something no shit captain obvious<\/p>\n

The high court ruled 6-3 in <\/b>Louisiana v. Callais<\/b><\/em> that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is designed to enforce the Constitution\u2019s prohibition on intentional racial discrimination, but not force states to engage in race-based discrimination by creating majority-minority districts. The court held that Louisiana\u2019s congressional map that had two majority-Black districts was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.<\/b><\/p>\n

Due to the dates of the state primary, the Court fast tracked the ruling.<\/p>\n

Shortly after, the Supreme Court released an\u00a0order<\/a>\u00a0in an 8-1 decision that, as described by The Federalist\u2019s Shawn Fleetwood<\/a>, would \u201cfast-track the transmission of its decision to the lower courts rather than wait 32 days, as per normal custom.\u201d The decision was made \u201cin accordance with existing SCOTUS rules,\u201d as Fleetwood pointed out. The decision allowed Louisiana to move toward new maps mid-election cycle rather than using the current, unconstitutional maps.<\/b><\/p>\n

And Louisiana promptly moved to fix the problem. In fact, a number of states moved to fix the problem of racially gerrymandered districts. This set off the Democrats since all of these \u201cBlack majority\u201d districts were actually used to insure that no Republican could ever win. A case in point is Tennessee. The legislature did a redistricting that ended a racially gerrymandered district in Memphis.<\/p>\n

What absolutely destroyed the Democrats claims that black only districts had to exist in order to insure black representation was who has held the seat for years. It was a white, male liberal heterosexual. The last election, he defeated a black female Republican.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Jackson issued a dissent claiming the court\u2019s 8-1 decision \u201chas spawned chaos in the State of Louisiana.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n

Actually, no, it didn\u2019t. They were fully prepared for the decision no matter which way it went.<\/p>\n

\u201cNot content to have decided the law, [the Supreme Court] now takes steps to influence its implementation,\u201d Jackson wrote. \u201cThe Court unshackles itself from both constraints today and dives into the fray. And just like that, those principles give way to power. Because this abandon is unwarranted and unwise, respectfully, I dissent.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

That stupidity set off the other justices.<\/p>\n

Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, wrote a concurring opinion that said Jackson\u2019s charges \u201ccannot go unanswered.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n

Alito said that Jackson\u2019s position \u201cwould require that the 2026 congressional elections in Louisiana be held under a map that has been held to be unconstitutional.\u201d Alito added Jackson\u2019s dissent offers one \u201ctrivial\u201d reason for her proposed course of action, and another that is \u201cbaseless and insulting.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n

That is about Jackson\u2019s speed. She is blindingly stupid. However, she is carrying out her instructions from the Democrat Party, which is to protect the interests of The Democrat Party and crush anything supporting the Republicans and\/or President Trump.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe dissent goes on to claim that our decision represents an unprincipled use of power. \u2026 That is a groundless and utterly irresponsible charge,\u201d Alito wrote. \u201cWhat principle has the Court violated? The principle that Rule 45.3\u2019s 32-day default period should never be shortened even when there is good reason to do so? The principle that we should never take any action that might unjustifiably be criticized as partisan?\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

It\u2019s hard to ignore that Jackson is treating standard functions of the court as possibly illegitimate whenever they happen to produce an outcome she dislikes.<\/b><\/p>\n

That is a major problem. Jackson\u2019s antics and her flagrant attacks on both the Court and other justices is something that I can\u2019t recall seeing or reading about in the entire history of the Supreme Court of the United States. I have a suspicion that Jackson may be the first Supreme Court justice removed from the court by Congress. That or she will be pressured to step down.<\/p>\n

What is really worrying are the announced plans by the Democrats if they regain control of the Senate and presidency in 2028. They want to fill the court with additional KBJ-like morons to issue ruling that the Democrats want. They see Ketanji Brown Jackson as the template of what they want for a justice. The ruling that would come down would essentially end the United States as a Constitutional Republic. What would come next?<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

It\u2019s time to start working to remove Ketanji Brown Jackson from the bench in a constitutional manner. If that means impeaching her in the House and convicting her in the senate for malfeasance and incompetence, so be it.<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (2<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is the most incompetent Supreme Court justice that has ever been appointed and confirmed. She is also blindingly stupid.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[100,115,219],"tags":[94,125,2164,1397,101,110,1398,34],"class_list":["post-47105","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-moonbat","category-stupidity-crime","category-the-good-idea-fairy","tag-chump-of-the-week","tag-epic-fail","tag-kbj","tag-ketanji-brown-jackson","tag-news","tag-scoamf","tag-scotus","tag-stupidity"],"views":45,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":46167,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=46167","url_meta":{"origin":47105,"position":0},"title":"Trump v. Slaughter and Brown Jackson\u2019s support of the Deep State","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"December 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. Currently, there is a case in front of the Supreme Court. The case is Trump v. Slaughter and involves whether the Executive Branch actually has control over the bureaucracy. Last March, President Trump fired Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission. Slaughter took offense\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Moonbat"","block_context":{"text":"Moonbat","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=100"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/schadenboner-246x300.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":46844,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=46844","url_meta":{"origin":47105,"position":1},"title":"Ketanji Brown Jackson doesn\u2019t appear to be a fan of the 1st Amendment","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"April 8, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. Once again, the Biden DEI appointment to the Supreme Court, Ketanji Brown Jackson, has demonstrated that she is not fit to be a justice in the highest court in the land. Recently, there was a case decided 8-1 in favor of the plaintiff Kaley Chiles. The case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "liberty"","block_context":{"text":"liberty","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=37"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/i.pinimg.com\/736x\/7f\/a4\/7d\/7fa47dd2e346d9a95fe1a4e69c91b081.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":45267,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=45267","url_meta":{"origin":47105,"position":2},"title":"Justice Amy Coney Barrett calls Ketanji Brown Jackson an idiot","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"June 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all, Today, Friday June 27th, the Supreme Court released their final rulings. One of them was in regards to Birthright Citizenship. However, that was actually a subset on the Democrats pet judges issuing nationwide injunctions against President Trump. It was the nationwide injunctions issue that the ruling was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Just Desserts"","block_context":{"text":"Just Desserts","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=135"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/i.pinimg.com\/736x\/86\/3c\/66\/863c6630552bed6bbced6c2b3b024872.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":45357,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=45357","url_meta":{"origin":47105,"position":3},"title":"Biden DEI SCOTUS Justice again shows she is unfit to be on the Court","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"July 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. Up until recently, Sonia Sotomayor was considered to be the dumbest member of the Supreme Court. Then came Joe Biden who said \u201cHold my ice cream and winter is puppies.\u201d He, or someone on his staff, nominated Ketanji Brown Jackson. Things went down hill from there. Right\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Just Desserts"","block_context":{"text":"Just Desserts","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=135"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/i.pinimg.com\/736x\/de\/26\/a7\/de26a7c85d293dec7edfb84271c99ffd.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":46959,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=46959","url_meta":{"origin":47105,"position":4},"title":"Ketanji Brown Jackson comes up with a new citizenship theory","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"April 30, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. A while back, arguments were heard before the Supreme Court regarding Birthright citizenship. The case revolves around one section of the 14th Amendment regarding a person being under the jurisdiction of the United States. The theory is that illegal aliens by being here illegally, aren\u2019t under the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Moonbat"","block_context":{"text":"Moonbat","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=100"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/i.pinimg.com\/736x\/0e\/79\/bb\/0e79bb4ad22c99d20b2d95a81e8a60a6.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":41903,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=41903","url_meta":{"origin":47105,"position":5},"title":"In a twist, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is hit with an ethics charge","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"December 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. Ever since the Greatest President of the 21st Century, Donald Trump, with some, reluctant assistance from Brainfreeze McConnell, flipped the Supreme Court from a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat Party, the Democrats have been flinging charges at the Constitutionalist justices like a monkey flinging crap. It\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Just Desserts"","block_context":{"text":"Just Desserts","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=135"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/i.pinimg.com\/originals\/b3\/59\/83\/b3598322c2639ab8b36c892e790c0a27.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=47105"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47105\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47107,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47105\/revisions\/47107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=47105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=47105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=47105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}