![](\"https:\/\/i.pinimg.com\/736x\/7f\/a4\/7d\/7fa47dd2e346d9a95fe1a4e69c91b081.jpg\")
<\/p>\nGood day all. If it\u2019s a day ending in a \u201cY\u201d Supreme Court Justice and DEI hire Ketanji Brown Jackson has said something that either ignores the constitution, insulted the other members of the court, or both.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
In this case, it looks like Biden\u2019s DEI hire decided now was a good time to attack the others on the Court for doing their jobs, something this moron is not capable of. Here are the details from the New York Post<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson<\/a> criticized the Supreme Court\u2019s use of its so-called \u201cshadow docket\u201d Thursday, complaining that her colleagues have been too quick to allow the Trump administration to move forward with controversial policies, eroding trust in the high court.<\/b><\/p>\n \u201cWe cannot expect the public to have faith in our judicial system if, without clear explanation, we are consistently green-lighting harmful acts that do real damage to litigating plaintiffs,\u201d Jackson, appointed by former President Joe Biden, said in remarks at the University of the District of Columbia \u2014 in a rare attack by a justice on how their colleagues conduct business<\/a>.<\/b><\/p>\n The NY Post article states that this is a \u201cRare attack\u201d by one justice on the others, but since KBJ was put on the bench, it\u2019s become a lot more common. Usually she write this in her laughably long winded dissenting opinions. At one point, Justice Amy Cohen Barrett, writing a majority opinion, basically said that Ketanji Brown Jackson\u2019s opinion could be ignored as irrelevant.<\/p>\n During President Trump\u2019s second term, the Justice Department has routinely used the court\u2019s so-called emergency docket to ask the justices to stay lower-court rulings blocking contentious policies. In such cases, the court typically does not hold oral arguments and a precise breakdown of how the justices vote is rarely provided. The opaqueness of the process has led critics to deride what they call the \u201cshadow docket,\u201d with Jackson herself calling its use \u201cproblematic.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n There is a reason for this. You have the lower courts issuing rulings, almost exclusively issued by COB judges, that are actively subverting things like securing elections. You have others issuing rulings that blatantly intrude into areas that are specifically the venue of the executive branch, and on occasion, the legislative branch. Many of these ruling are designed to basically help the Democrats in the midterm elections. The idea is that going through the normal processes with take so long as to be rendered moot. This is why the Administration goes straight to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n In her remarks, first reported by The Washington Post,<\/a> Jackson called for her colleagues to return to \u201cfirst principles\u201d and be more restrained in their interventions in contentious political cases.<\/b><\/p>\n \u201cVery little good comes from taking an institution that is supposed to be operating outside of the political realm and routinely steering it into the fray,\u201d she contended, adding that while past iterations of the Supreme Court followed that maxim, the current bench \u201chas been noticeably less restrained, especially with respect to pending cases that involve controversial matters.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n Actions the court has allowed Trump to take using the shadow docket include laying off more than 1,300 workers at the Department of Education<\/a>\u00a0in July 2025, canceling $783 million<\/a> in National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grants tied to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives the following month, and carrying out sweeping immigration raids<\/a> across Los Angeles.<\/b><\/p>\n I don\u2019t know most of these cases, at least not in detail, so I\u2019m going to be guessing for the most part. The layoffs are part of the long term strategy of closing down the Education Department. I\u2019m going to assume that the plaintiffs were the ones who were let go. For your average bureaucrat, a government job is their right and they can never be terminated for any reason ever. Apparently, if I recall correctly, there is a mechanism in place that does allow for mass layoffs, and it was passed by congress. I\u2019m guessing that if this is the case, the judge flat out ignored it.<\/p>\n Canceling the grant, again if I\u2019m remembering correctly, was part of ending the whole racist DEI garbage that the Progressive liberal Democrats have been shoving down everyone\u2019s throats. Since the government isn\u2019t supposed to tolerate racism in any form, they closed all of this down. Since activist COB judges are standard Democrats, they are racists themselves.<\/p>\n The immigration raids in Los Angeles are part of the administrations cleaning up the mess created by the previous administration. Kalifornistan has been actively protecting criminal aliens and went to one of their COB judges to stop the raids. This was a flat out threat to the safety of Federal Agents and American citizens.<\/p>\n The court has also ruled against Trump in shadow docket cases, blocking him from sending the National Guard to Chicago<\/a> in December of 2025 and striking down tighter rules around mail-in voting<\/a> earlier this month.<\/b><\/p>\n And that Chicago decision, in my opinion, was probably a mistake, one that has gotten people killed. The ruling on mail in ballots is also a mistake. We\u2019ve already seen how mail in ballots are a major source of cheating by the Democrats. If they do this again in the midterms, and it\u2019s proven, there will be significant blow back with some of it hitting the courts.<\/p>\n![](\"https:\/\/i.pinimg.com\/736x\/65\/6e\/f1\/656ef1afa483c44b2524a332b5d4987e.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/eyerolll-brain.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![](\"https:\/\/i.pinimg.com\/736x\/ec\/e0\/fd\/ece0fdbe370ac138440c67fbb615aa24.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/i.pinimg.com\/736x\/de\/12\/49\/de1249c56e51ff2dc731715e8f000aaf.jpg\")
<\/p>\n