{"id":8264,"date":"2012-07-01T10:17:54","date_gmt":"2012-07-01T14:17:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=8264"},"modified":"2012-07-01T10:42:59","modified_gmt":"2012-07-01T14:42:59","slug":"a-call-for-impeachment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=8264","title":{"rendered":"A call for Impeachment"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all, a very Angry Webmaster here. It has been a few days since Chief Justice John Glover Roberts sided with the liberal members of the court and using some really bizarre reasoning, upheld Obamacare.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

There has been a lot of discussion on why Roberts ruled as he did. The conservative segment of the nation is in shock over what he did and the liberal segment is behaving in their usual manner. Insulting anyone who disagrees with them in the most vile manner. Just read some of the comments on the more liberal minded blogs to see what I\u2019m talking about.<\/p>\n

The conservative talking heads, television, radio and blogosphere, have been trying to figure out what Roberts did and why. From what I\u2019ve been hearing and reading, the Beltway Bandits, such as Charles Krauthammer ((Krauthammer: Why Roberts did it<\/a>)) are saying that Roberts was actually being very clever in restricting the Commerce Clause ((The Commerce Clause<\/a>)). Krauthammer and the others who think that are deluding themselves.<\/p>\n

What Roberts did was grant Congress absolute power over the citizens of the United States. No one has denied that Congress has the power to tax, but that has always been on things like income, property, Alcohol, etc. What Roberts and the other four justices did was give Congress the power to tax a negative. What that means is that Congress can now tax you for NOT having something. In this case, it\u2019s health insurance. Next time it may be not buying an electric car or perhaps not buying solar panels. For the liberal side of the discussion, it could also mean forcing you to buy guns and ammunition. For vegans it might be used to force them to buy meat. Where does this end?<\/p>\n

Thanks to Chief Justice Roberts, it doesn\u2019t.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve been discussing this with others and the responses are frightening. The people have been overwhelmingly opposed to Obamacare since day one. The 2010 shellacking the democrats took was a direct result of Obamacare being shoved down people\u2019s throats. When this decision came out, along with the analysis of the dissent by the other 4 justices, people were stunned. The people I\u2019ve been corresponding with have been saying they have been talking with people locally that they have known for years.<\/p>\n

Those friends of theirs are mad. In the words of one person, they are \u201cKilling mad.\u201d He said that he could see it in their faces. They weren\u2019t screaming and shouting in a blind rage, but if you took one look at them you could see that they had made a decision. Basically, the decision is that all hope is lost and the only alternative to restore the constitution will be with force of arms.<\/p>\n

I and the people I\u2019ve been talking with do NOT want to see that happen, although we all understand that it might be to late to stop it. There is still hope though and that is the General Election in November. With a little luck and a lot of hard work, Obama will be gone and the Senate will become Republican.<\/p>\n

Now, assuming all this does happen, what do we do about this disaster of a ruling? In point of fact, it really isn\u2019t a ruling at all. Chief Justice Roberts rewrote the law, (Obamacare), to fit his ruling. This is called \u201cLegislating from the bench\u201d ((Judicial activism<\/a>)) and is a violation of the separation of powers. All a judge can do is rule a law constitutional or unconstitutional. They can NOT change the law to fit their views. Some rulings can be debated as to whether or not the judge(s) were imposing their views, others are so blatant that there can be no doubt. I think this is just such a case.<\/p>\n

Therefore, I am calling on the new congress to file a bill of impeachment against Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., Associate Justice Ruth Bader-Ginsburg, Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Associate Justice Elena Kagen.<\/p>\n

Now you might be saying, \u201cWhat are the charges?\u201d It really doesn\u2019t matter since Impeachment is really a political tool. The normal rules of evidence don\u2019t apply. All that can happen upon conviction is the removal from office of the impeached official. They don\u2019t go to jail or lose any rights. The last impeachment trial was President William Jefferson \u201cSlick Willie\u201d Clinton. He was impeached for perjury in the house but acquitted in the Senate. The last impeachment with a conviction in the Senate was former federal judge Thomas Porteous. He was impeached in the House March 11th<\/sup> 2010 and convicted in the Senate December 8th<\/sup> 2010. ((Former Judge Thomas Porteous<\/a>))<\/p>\n

Generally, those officials who face impeachment have been accused of committing actual crimes. This hasn\u2019t always been the case. This is why, other than being thrown out of office, impeachment carries no lose of freedom or fines.<\/p>\n

In the case of the 5 justices I named, there could be a number of charges. For Chief Justice Roberts, it might be violating the separation of powers listed in the constitution. For Elena Kagan, Conflict of interest. She was hip deep in the development of Obamacare before she was put on the bench. Ruth Bader-Ginsburg has repeatedly made statements that she doesn\u2019t like the constitution and would prefer ones like South Africa\u2019s. Since she doesn\u2019t want to uphold the document she swore on oath to, she should either resign or be removed. Sotomayor and Breyer both along with Bader-Ginsburg and Kagan reject the constitutions limits on government power. Apparently none of them studied the Federalist Papers and the writings of the authors of the Constitution. They wrote it to expressly limit the reach of the government, not it\u2019s expansion.<\/p>\n

Now I\u2019m not a lawyer nor am I a Constitutional scholar. I don\u2019t need to be. The constitution was intentionally written so that anyone could understand it. I have no doubt that these five fully understand what the original intent was, they just don\u2019t care. Therefore, in my not so lawyerly opinion, the grounds exist for their impeachment and removal.<\/p>\n

Will it happen? Not in the current session. The Democrats in Congress, who have shown that they don\u2019t care about the Constitution, the law or the nation will protect them. Even if the Republicans regain control of the senate, it will require Democrats to actually follow their oath\u2019s of office. Still, I think it should be done. If the Roberts 5 are Impeached in the House but not convicted in the Senate and it is a party line vote, then the Republicans should use this to show just how lawless the Democrats truly are.<\/p>\n

The alternative is not good.<\/p>\n

Call your representatives and Senators and demand action. If yours won\u2019t do their job, get rid of them in November. It\u2019s time to make this a campaign issue.<\/p>\n

Thatisall…for now.<\/p>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (1<\/strong> votes, average: 1.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Good day all, a very Angry Webmaster here. It has been a few days since Chief Justice John Glover Roberts sided with the liberal members of the court and using some really bizarre reasoning, upheld Obamacare.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[5,37,71,8,35],"tags":[11,52,12,13,5,101,8,27],"class_list":["post-8264","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history","category-liberty-politics","category-news-of-the-day","category-politics","category-tyranny","tag-america","tag-constitution","tag-freedom","tag-healthcare","tag-history","tag-news","tag-politics","tag-totalitarianism"],"views":1754,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3020,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=3020","url_meta":{"origin":8264,"position":0},"title":"Meet the liberal Elite","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"December 1, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"I was pointed at this video which shows a conservative talking to a member of the Liberal Elite.","rel":"","context":"In "Entertainment"","block_context":{"text":"Entertainment","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=4"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":45983,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=45983","url_meta":{"origin":8264,"position":1},"title":"The fall of the Heritage Foundation","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"November 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. I will start off by saying that I haven\u2019t been paying to much attention to the Heritage Foundation. I know they are one of the main conservative think tanks in Washington and have come up with any number of excellent ideas for the Republican Party. This is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "MAGA"","block_context":{"text":"MAGA","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=750"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/i.pinimg.com\/736x\/47\/dc\/13\/47dc13aee4878e65bf9e865eb5c3e729.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":14678,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=14678","url_meta":{"origin":8264,"position":2},"title":"Sebelius thinking about running for U.S. Senate","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"April 17, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Oh PLEASE, Please make it true! The Kansas Democrat party is asking soon to be former Health and Human Services secretary Kathleen Sebelius to run against the current senator, Pat Roberts.","rel":"","context":"In "Moonbat"","block_context":{"text":"Moonbat","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=100"},"img":{"alt_text":"web sites for Dummies","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/11\/web-sites-for-Dummies-300x200.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":33998,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=33998","url_meta":{"origin":8264,"position":3},"title":"USSC rules 8-1 to allow free speech suits to proceed","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"March 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. Colleges and Universities are supposed to be centers of higher learning and open debate. However, over the last 30 years, they have gone in the opposite direction and become nothing more then socialist reeducation centers that actively stifle any debate. This has led to these \u201cschools\u201d creating\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hero"","block_context":{"text":"Hero","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=181"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/liberalismjealousgod1-300x147.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":30527,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=30527","url_meta":{"origin":8264,"position":4},"title":"Moonbat judge attacks John Roberts","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"March 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. Last week a federal judge decided to let fly at Chief Justice John Roberts. He basically accused Roberts and the Supreme court of being a threat to the Constitution and the democratic institutions of the United States. This judge, U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman, was appointed to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Moonbat"","block_context":{"text":"Moonbat","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=100"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/trump-oh-look-300x150.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":27906,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=27906","url_meta":{"origin":8264,"position":5},"title":"The Ruth Bader-Ginsberg death watch","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"January 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader-Ginsberg, or, as she is also known as, The Notorious RGB, recently underwent pretty major surgery for cancer. She is currently recovering, however, she has missed a few cases. RGB, who is well into her dotage 80\u2019s, has been a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Just Desserts"","block_context":{"text":"Just Desserts","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=135"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/keep-calm-and-oh-my-god-were-all-gonna-die-257x300.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8264","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8264"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8264\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8274,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8264\/revisions\/8274"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8264"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8264"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8264"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}