There is another scandal out there that isn’t getting as much coverage as all the other Obama scandals. This one concerns the State Department and how evidence of criminal activities by members of the foreign service was covered up.
In this case, we have a State Department investigator, who in doing her job, discovered a whole host of criminal activities including solicitation of minors for sexual purposes. What happened to her? How does being outright threatened strike you? In a story in Foreign Policy, (Registration appears to be required), Aurelia Fedenisn tells how she discovered all sorts of wrong doing and was threatened by federal agents.
The State Department investigator who accused colleagues last week of using drugs, soliciting prostitutes, and having sex with minors says that Foggy Bottom is now engaged in an “intimidation” campaign to stop her.
Last week’s leaks by Aurelia Fedenisn, a former State Department inspector general investigator, shined a light on alleged wrongdoing by U.S. officials around the globe. But her attorney Cary Schulman tells The Cable that Fedenisn has paid a steep price: “They had law enforcement officers camp out in front of her house, harass her children and attempt to incriminate herself.”
This all occurred under Hillary “Reset Button ((Clinton Goofs on Russian Translation, Tells Diplomat She Wants to ‘Overcharge’ Ties))” Clinton. Her maladministration of the Department of State is going to be legendary and with a little luck, result in criminal prosecution.
To continue:
Fedenisn’s life changed dramatically last Monday after she handed over documents and statements to CBS News alleging that senior State Department officials “influenced, manipulated, or simply called off” several investigations into misconduct. The suppression of investigations was noted in an early draft of an Inspector General report, but softened in the final version.
Now this is a lot different from the Edward Snowden matter. Ms. Fedensin did not leak secret information and the information in question isn’t classified. So how did the Obama Regime respond? Did they arrest the criminals in question? Need you ask?
Last week’s leaks (This would be the week of June 10th, 2013. AW) by Aurelia Fedenisn, a former State Department inspector general investigator, shined a light on alleged wrongdoing by U.S. officials around the globe. But her attorney Cary Schulman tells The Cable that Fedenisn has paid a steep price: “They had law enforcement officers camp out in front of her house, harass her children and attempt to incriminate herself.”
Law enforcement? Sounds more like members of the KGB or Gestapo goon squads to me.
Schulman says the purpose of the visit was to get Fedenisn to sign a document admitting that she stole State Department materials, such as the memos leaked to CBS. Schulman says it was crucial that she didn’t sign the document because her separation agreement with the State Department includes a provision allowing disclosures of misconduct. Furthermore, none of the materials were classified.
Schulman charged that sending law enforcement officers to pressure her into signing an agreement was heavy handed. “Why not simply mail it, courier it, send it Federal Express or deliver it by any other normal means by which one delivers a demand letter? Why send two federal law enforcement agents?” he asked. He also said that officials from the Inspector General’s Office told him they’d be having a “no kidding get together with the DOJ,” implying to him that they would push criminal charges if his client didn’t cooperate.
How nice. “Sign this document confessing to crimes that didn’t happen or we will prosecute you for not breaking the law! Sieg Heil! This is what
happens when we have a corrupt administration and a bureaucracy out of control. Eventually, something really bad is going to happen and it will cost the lives of several, or even dozens of federal agents.
“This type of intimidation technique is all too common when an agency wants something from you that it is not entirely confident it can get without your cooperation, and more often than not people who don’t know any better fall for it,” he told The Cable. “Regardless of what you may think of Fedenisn’s motives, she worked for these guys for years and she knows their playbook … I would have been shocked if she did anything except promptly hire a lawyer and call their bluff.”
I can see a massive lawsuit. Right off the bat, if the Feds want her to settle, it will require the termination of every single individual involved in this intimidation including the goons with badges who threatened her. Then there is cash.
I’ve reached the point where I think it’s time to start calling the offices of various governors and seeing if they think it’s time to start the ball rolling on a Constitutional Convention. Many people, almost all of them inside the Beltway ((Inside the Beltway)), are terrified at the thought. They think that it would mean a complete rewrite of the Constitution and the revocation of the rights we now hold. I disagree. I think it can be limited to certain amendments that are needed to strip power away from the Federal Government and restore the rights of the individual people and the states. Otherwise….
Thatisall
~The Angry Webmaster~



How Obama treats legal whistleblowers – #angercentralarchives http://t.co/NhvdlL4slm
How Obama treats legal whistleblowers – #angercentralarchives http://t.co/NhvdlKMj7e
Pingback: Have they forgotten Watergate? « Musings of the Angry Webmaster