Losing lawyer calls Supreme Court racist

I recently wrote about the Supreme Court upholding the ban on affirmative action in Michigan. This was primarily aimed at the universities in that state. The law which was being argued basically said that you can’t discriminate due to someone’s skin color when approving them for admittance to collage.

The decision went 6-2 in favor of upholding the Michigan ban on affirmative action. The only two who opposed it were Sotomayor and Bader-Ginsburg, the two hard left moonbats who sat on this case. (Elena Kagan recused herself) I have gone into the meat of the decision so I wont’ repeat myself. I’m going to talk about what a real piece of work the lawyer who argued and lost the case is. This nitwit, in the typical manner of moonbats everywhere when they lose an argument, has said the court, at least the 6 members who went against her, are racists. Here are the details from Fox News:

The civil rights lawyer who argued unsuccessfully before the Supreme Court to end Michigan’s affirmative action ban repeated Sunday that the high court’s decision was “racist.”

This is a racist decision that takes us back to an era of state’s rights,” civil rights attorney Shanta Driver told “Fox News Sunday.” “This decision cannot stand.”

A typical tolerant Democrat

What a typical member of the Progressive Liberal Fascist Democrats. She didn’t get her way and so it’s racism. And I hate to be the bearer of bad news comrade, but the court wasn’t split 5-4 as has been the case of late. One of the progressive liberals crossed over. I have no idea how Kagan would have ruled. And now a little back story.

The high court’s 6-2 decision Tuesday upheld a voter-approved change to the Michigan Constitution in 2006 that forbids the state’s public colleges to make race, gender, ethnicity or national origin a factor in college admissions. The basis of the case was the 1995 decision of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor to reject the application of Jennifer Gratz.

Ms. Gratz met all the qualifications for admittance to the university except one. She was not of recent African decent, but of distant African decent.

Gratz, who is white, told “Fox News Sunday” that she found it “unbelievable” that a decision that prohibits race discrimination could be perceived as “racist.” She also said she challenged the school’s decision because it was based on “skin color,” not because her enrollment application was rejected.

Ms. Gratz, you appear to not fully understand the thought processes of the Progressive Liberal Fascist Democrat Moonbat. Oh wait, they don’t have thought processes, they only “feel” things. If it feels right or feels good, then it is acceptable. Anything else is RACIST!

Driver argued that minorities typically attend under-performing schools, which put them at a disadvantage compared to students at better, suburban schools. And minority students have less power, compared to athletes or children of alumni, for example, to get accepted into universities, she said.

Well, Ms. Dumbass, you might want to consider a few odds and ends here. A fair number of people on athletic scholarships, (And I wont’ go into my opinion of those), happen to have dark skin. And about all those under performing schools? Why aren’t you working to improve them? Are you volunteering to tutor all those students that need help and guidance? Of course you aren’t. Your response to people telling you to shove off is this:

“The old Jim Crow [law] is now the new Jim Crow,” Driver said.

I looked up Shanta Driver, and what the hell kind of a name is “Shanta” anyway? Isn’t that the name of Shamu’s sister in the whale pod or something? Anyway, she is a classic moonbat. She graduated from Harvard with a degree, (I think), in Psychology and Social Relations. Then she went to law school, however it wasn’t Harvard Law. I guess they thought they had already done their affirmative action bit with her Psychology and Social Relations degree. In looking through the remainder of her biography, all I see is an angry, left wing failure who refuses to see people as, you know, people. From what I’m seeing and her own remarks, she comes across as someone who thinks the world owes her. It isn’t at all surprising that she immediately resorted to screaming “RACIST” when she didn’t get her way.

Barking Moonbat

Well Ms. Driver, I have some bad news for you. You and all the other moonbats have gone to the “YOU’RE ALL RACISTS!!” well to often and the well has run dry. People, in general, no longer consider what is on the outside, only what is on the inside. To quote Master Yoda:

Luminous beings are we, not this crude matter.”

Wake up and smell the roses Ms. Driver. There is no more institutional racism except by people like you. You are the new racists.

suck it up Buttercup

Thatisall

~The Angry Webmaster~

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

Loading...

Video: Killer Affirmative Action Debate – Reading The Score

Published On April 27, 2014 | By Frank Camp | Culture, Debate, Politics, Racialism. Fox News Sunday guests, Jennifer Gratz, and Shanta Driver debate affirmative action. Driver tries really hard to make her point, but Gratz nails it! Take a look.
http://www.readingthescore.com/ — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 23:23:31 -0700

The Madison Conservative: The Schuette Decision

“This is a racist decision that takes us back to an era of state’s rights,” civil rights attorney Shanta Driver protested. “This decision cannot stand. The old Jim Crow is now the new Jim Crow.” A fine example of judicial respect; the American …
http://themadisonconservative.blogspot.com/ — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 23:09:00 -0700
The Supreme Court delivered a huge blow to Affirmative Action this week by siding with Michigan. FNC’s Chris Wallace hosts this spirited debate between Jennifer Gratz (XIV Foundation CEO) and Shanta Driver (Civil Rights Attorney) as they …
http://pumabydesign001.com/ — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 20:58:21 -0700
“This is a racist decision that takes us back to an era of state’s rights,” civil rights attorney Shanta Driver told “Fox News Sunday.” “This decision cannot stand.” This is truly remarkable. A decision that makes it illegal to give preferential treatment …
http://tarheelred.com/ — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:48:18 -0700

Is Affirmative Action A Thing Of The Past? « Sago

The civil rights lawyer [Shanta Driver] who argued unsuccessfully before the Supreme Court to end Michigan’s affirmative action ban repeated Sunday that the high court’s decision was “racist.” Below is an excellent debate, from April 27th, on …
http://sago.com/ — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 18:35:07 -0700
I knew it would not take long before one or more race cards got played. The left loved the Supreme Courts ruling on Obamacare. Then the Supreme Court gores a sacred ox of the left now the left despises the court A little FYI for Shanta Driver …
http://givemeliberty01.com/ — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 18:00:58 -0700

Affirmative Action – when will it ever end? – Political Blogs …

… decided by the US Supreme Court concerning race preferences (affirmative action) in admission policies at the University of Michigan) and Shanta Driver who argued FOR racial discrimination to be continued to combat racial discrimination …
http://americanpoliticalblogs.com/ — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 17:19:00 -0700
The Supreme Court delivered ruling, 6-2, to Affirmative Action this week by siding with Michigan. FNC’s Chris Wallace hosts this spirited debate between Jennifer Gratz (XIV Foundation CEO) and Shanta Driver (Civil Rights Attorney) as they …
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/ — Sun, 27 Apr 2014 15:56:12 -0700

The Culture of Fear, Narcissism, Capitalism — Money is Blood

It’s “a racist decision,” the modern equivalent to the Supreme Court’s 1896 Plessy v Ferguson ruling sanctifying racial segregation, said Shanta Driver, lawyer for Detroit-based By Any Means Necessary, the losing party in the case.
http://joelcmagnuson.com/ — Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:16:12 -0700
Things got heated when civil rights attorney Shanta Driver called the decision “racist:”. Gratz was shocked that someone would describe an Affirmative Action ban as “racist.” “I think it is unbelievable that someone would sit here and say …
http://www.breitbartunmasked.com/ — Tue, 29 Apr 2014 03:47:49 -0700
Nonprofit Fundraising Groups Promoting Inequality at Newport-Mesa Unified School District – If you listened to Shanta Driver’s comments on Sunday, much of her argument for affirmative action rests on the idea that K-12 education is …
http://woodstermangotwood.blogspot.com/ — Tue, 29 Apr 2014 03:00:00 -0700
The other panelist was civil rights attorney, Shanta Driver. As I watched the debate unfold, one thing I could not help but notice was the use of the word “equality,” in each opposing side’s rationale for their position. Gratz, who advocated for …
http://legalinsurrection.com/ — Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:59:56 -0700
We have been discussing the Court’s ruling in the Michigan affirmative action case, Schuette v. BAMN. This included a recent column in CNN with two of my George Washington law students. This Sunday, civil rights attorney Shanta Driver …
http://jonathanturley.org/ — Mon, 28 Apr 2014 05:29:24 -0700
Share my Musings on Social Media

About Angry Webmaster

I am the Angry Webmaster! Fear Me!
This entry was posted in Just Desserts, Moonbat, News of the Day, Stupidity and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Losing lawyer calls Supreme Court racist

  1. VonZorch Imperial Researcher says:

    “not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character”
    Bonus points if you can name who said it without looking it up.

    0
    0
  2. Losing lawyer calls Supreme Court racist http://t.co/coCweGoeiy #angercentral #tcot #michigan #affirmativeaction #twitchypolitics #moonbats

    0
    0
  3. Losing lawyer calls Supreme Court racist http://t.co/8gNN8bKVCC #angercentral #tcot #michigan #affirmativeaction… http://t.co/dkus1zq4Mg

    0
    0

Leave a Reply