Good day all. As you know, a Muslim Terrorist attacked a pair of military recruiting offices and murdered four U.S. Marines and a United States Navy sailor.
The reason this murdering, and now dead, scum was able to do so much damage is due to an executive order forbidding members of the military from carrying their weapons on duty. (The exceptions are if they are training or on the range of course) While I would like nothing better than to blame this on Obama, the order goes back to George H.W. Bush.
Now there is a report that one navy officer and a marine did fire back with their personally owned firearms.
A report distributed among senior Navy leaders during the shooting’s aftermath said Lt. Cmdr. Timothy White, the support center’s commanding officer, used his personal firearm to engage Abdulazeez, Navy Times confirmed with four separate sources. A Navy official also confirmed a Washington Post report indicating one of the slain Marines may have been carrying a 9mm Glock and possibly returned fire on the gunman.
The military uses Beretta’s, not Glocks. I haven’t seen any other reports confirming if this happened, and if these two brave men did use their own weapons to protect the others, they would be in violation of orders and subject to court martial.
Since the attack, the latest in a string of attacks by Islamic terrorists against military personnel, civilians, understanding that the troops are under orders not to carry weapon, have taken it upon themselves to stand guard where needed in case another goat raping Islamic turd wants to go on Jihad. Here are some of the details from Fox News:
It’s supposed to be the other way around, but civilians – as well as state and local authorities – have taken up the task of protecting the military in the wake of the Chattanooga terror attack. Citizens groups, veterans, local law enforcement and the National Guard are all standing armed watch over the men and women of the military, protecting them from terrorists and – some say – from a federal policy that leaves service members unable to defend themselves on Pentagon property.
I haven’t served in the Military, and from what I’ve been reading, a number of others volunteering to stand guard haven’t either. We all feel that it’s our chance to pay back those in uniform who put themselves at the sharp end protecting us. Now we, as Americans, are putting our own lives on the line for them. It’s only fair and right. There’s just one problem. That problem is the Pentagon. According to Yahoo News:
The Pentagon asked that concerned armed citizens not stand guard at military recruiting offices, saying it can handle security on its own after a shooting rampage.
Yeah, by ordering the men and women on duty to “Close the window blinds.”
Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook said the Defense Department appreciated the “outpouring of support” but warned that the volunteers might do more harm than good. “We ask that individuals not stand guard at recruiting offices as it could adversely impact our mission, and potentially create unintended security risks,” Cook said.
What security risks? Oh, you mean the security of Islamic terrorists to have a clear shot at unarmed soldiers? According to stories I’ve been reading, the military personnel on scene are not worried at all and are thanking the citizens.
I do know of one site where citizens started standing guard and the owner of the building asked them to stop. The citizens, being law abiding people, respected the owners wishes, and apparently either left their guns elsewhere or left the grounds. I have not been able to locate any further information.
While the Pentagon and the Obama Regime continue to gaze at their navels from the inside, (Due to their heads being shoved up their asses), state governors are taking actions of their own, authorizing national guard troops to carry weapons and ammunition while on duty and deploying some to guard federal installations. There are also local police who are either loitering near the military offices while on duty or stopping by when on their own time.
When will people understand that we are in a war with Islam, and that these attacks are going to continue and will ramp up? I know that Obama won’t do anything about and in all probability is aiding the Jihadists in their goals. Yes, I know how that sounds, and I would love to have a better explanation for his apparent indifference to the Islamic threat. Please provide one if you have it in the comments section.
If we have yet another attack, and this one is stopped by armed citizens, then it may be time to begin the lawful removal from office of those who refuse to do their duty to defend and protect the Constitution, (and by extension, the United States of America and it’s citizens), from enemies, foreign and domestic.
Thatisall
~The Angry Webmaster~
[yasr_visitor_votes size=”medium”]
clearly Obama is aiding the muslims. I don’t know why people have any doubts. he wrote in one of his books that he would stand with the muslims if the winds turned in an ugly direction. Contrary to what some who voted for him would like to believe, we had fair warning of what this man is (in spite of the media attempts to cover ) If you were listening at all, paying even a tiny bit of attention you’d know he’s an anti-american, marxist muslim. People that voted for him the second time should be shot for treason or be institutionalized because they are obviously too stupid to care for themselves.