The Aurora massacre is the fault of

Everyone and everything but the murderer who committed the crime. After all, he couldn’t help himself. It was the guns/violent movies/early potty training/bed wetting/his teachers etc.

Right on schedule, the morons, primarily on the left have started blaming everything and everyone else for the actions of the murderer ((I will NOT name him or in anyway aggrandize him. AW)) of 12 people in Colorado. Right at the top of the list, of course, are guns. “If we had “reasonable ((Reasonable defined as total confiscation))” gun control measures, he wouldn’t have been able to get a gun!” The current one, now that the attempts to blame guns is failing ((Gun sales increased after Aurora)), is blaming violence in movies and television. The latest iteration comes from producer Harvey Weinstein ((Film Producer Harvey Weinstein)).

In an article on the Huffington Post:

Harvey Weinstein said Hollywood filmmakers “can’t shirk our responsibility” for depicting violence in popular movies, while insisting that the real lesson of last week’s shootings in Aurora, Colorado, is the need for U.S. politicians to take a stand and regulate access to firearms.

“If we don’t get gun-control laws in this country, we are full of beans,” the Oscar-winning producer told The Huffington Post by phone from Paris. “To have the National Rifle Association rule the United States of America is pathetic. And I agree with Mayor Michael Bloomberg: it’s time to put up or shut up about gun control for both parties. Mitt Romney better outline where he stands, and people know that I’m a firm supporter of the president and I believe he’s got to do the same.”

Weinstein is a typical member of the Hollywood Progressive Elite. A complete idiot untouched by common sense. Of course, Obama has hemmed and hawwed over calls to ban guns. So what did Weinstein do?

Weinstein, who is set co-host a fundraiser for Barack Obama in Greenwich, CT, on August 6, declined to criticize the president directly for shying away from a fight over gun control. “I don’t think he’s timid,” he said. “I think he’s got deep personal beliefs. I don’t have to agree with everything a candidate does to support him.”

In other words, “Our primary goal is getting the SCoaMF back into office so he can finish destroying the United States. Once that’s done we can all be friends and smell the Unicorn farts from UN bureaucrats who, in their benevolent wisdom, will guide us to Utopia.”

So what does he do? He’s just said he will do anything to protect Der Fubar, so he has to move on to the next thing to blame. Violence in movies.

“It’s a question that I wrestle with all the time,” said Weinstein, who has produced all of director Quentin Tarantino’s blood-spattered films, including the upcoming slave-era revenge fantasy “Django Unchained.” “I’ve been involved with violent movies, and then I’ve also said at a certain point, ‘I can’t take it anymore. Please cut it.’ You know, you’ve got to respect the filmmaker, and it’s a really tough issue. My heart goes out to those kids and those families.”

Weinstein said he hoped that members of the Hollywood community would take this opportunity to have an honest conversation about how on-screen violence influences real-world events. “I think, as filmmakers, we should sit down – the Marty Scorseses, the Quentin Tarantinos, and hopefully all of us who deal in violence in movies – and discuss our role in that.”

No, actually, we don’t. If you don’t like producing movies that are violent, then don’t! You can make all those wonderful artsy fartsy movies that no one outside of your small circle of useless idiots will waste $8 on. Then, like all such ventures, you’ll go broke and those movies that no one wants to see, won’t be made.

Weinstein is a typical member of the Hollywood loony bin. He has no idea how the rest of the world works and is certain that if violent movies aren’t made, then there won’t be any violence. I have news for you Harvey. Most of the Taliban have never seen a movie. Those barbarians don’t even know what toilet paper is.

In the case of the Aurora murderer, he was bonkers. Having firearms was handy for him but not required. Just look at what the police had to deal with in his apartment. Enough explosives and incendiaries to level the building. Considering the time of night, the odds are a lot more people would have died there than in the theater. If the orange haired whackjob didn’t have guns, he probably would have used his bombs, or even have made some sort of poison gas weapons. He was studying to be a doctor numb-nuts, so he understood chemistry. Whipping up a batch of cyanide, mustard or even sarin gas ((Sarin Nerve gas)) would probably just been a logistics problem for him, nothing else.

No, the only one responsible for this crime is the murderer. Not the movie, not the guns, not even the booby traps he left behind. Just him. The only other possibly thing that may be somewhat responsible is the owners of the theater chain. They are the ones who decreed all their theaters to be Target Rich Environments Gun Free zones and didn’t provide the security to prevent this, or any other nut job from gaining entrance and shooting the place up. We may never know if anyone in that audience was licensed to carry but followed the rules. All I know is, every other time something like this happened and someone had a gun, the bad guy was stopped dead. Usually literally.

Hey Harvey? Why don’t you just stick to making mediocre movies and leave the rest of us alone? No one is going to pay any attention to you. Other than insulting you and spreading the word on your idiocy, I sure won’t be.

Thatisall

~The Angry Webmaster~

(1 votes, average: 1.00 out of 5)

Loading...