About that Iran nuclear deal

Good day all. As you know if you read my blog, as well as other sources of information, Last Sunday, Secretary of State John Forbes “Liveshot” Kerry and President Barack “Tee Time” Obama started crowing about a deal with the Iranians.

This deal was going to cause the Iranians to stop enriching uranium to weapons grade levels. Apparently, someone forgot to tell the Iranians about this. The promptly announced that the world had said they have the right to make nuclear weapons and blow Israel off the map. (Ok, a bit of an overstatement, but you get my meaning) Here are some of the details from Fox News:

Despite the highly touted Iranian nuclear deal announced by the Obama administration over the weekend, the two sides still can’t seem to agree on what it is they agreed to. The aftermath of the deal struck early Sunday in Geneva has been marked by confusion. According to Iranian media, the country’s Foreign Ministry is now claiming that the White House put out an invalid fact sheet about the agreement.

In other words, the Iranians are saying Obama lied. Well there is precedent for this. King Putt is an inveterate liar, and will lie about anything.

A ministry spokeswoman called it a “one-sided interpretation of the agreed text,” and said parts of it “contradict” the actual plan, according to Fars News Agency. The Foreign Ministry did not specify what language might have clashed with their interpretation of the agreement, but called the White House statement a “modified version of the deal” — and released their own version of the plan.

Gee whiz! Obama changing things after people agreed to them? Who would have thought? Me for one.

That document, among other distinctions, recognizes Iran’s “right to nuclear energy for peaceful purposes,” something the White House statement does not mention.

And Iran’s idea of peaceful use include peacefully building nuclear weapons and peacefully delivering them to Israel and the United States. If they happen to detonate, Oh well, it is as Allah wills it that the Great Satan and Israel are blown off the map. If Allah had not willed it, then the bombs would not have gone off even after being fused and launched at the Great Satan and Israel.

That appears to be one lingering sticking point between the two countries. Immediately after the deal was announced, Iranian officials were claiming that the agreement both recognized their right to enrich uranium and took military force off the table.

Now, considering the utter incompetence of Liveshot, and the blatant stupidity of the SCoaMF, I can believe they did just what the Iranians said. On the other hand, when it comes to dealing with infidels, Muslims are expected to lie in order to further the goals of Islam. In this case, building and using nuclear weapons. That lantern jawed gigolo is to arrogant to bother actually studying the enemy.

Now many people call Der Fubar a closet Muslim. I have no idea if he is or not, but he did grow up in that culture. This is why he has a blind spot for radical Islam, (Which pretty much describes that political system masquerading as a religion), and why he has backed every single radical Islamic group in the middle east.

The deal calls for Iran to freeze parts of its nuclear program, including halting enrichment above 5 percent, and allows for billions in sanctions relief during this time period.

IIRC, those billions were frozen under Carter after that idiot sold the Shah down the river. (Progressive liberal idiots. Always backing the radicals expecting that they will be loved. Never happens, ever) The money was supposed to be used for settlements of lawsuits and stuff. Now I am doing this from my Swiss cheese memory, so take it with a large grain of salt.

To an extent, the disagreements over the finer points of the deal likely reflect political posturing on both sides, as each tries to present the document as a win. While Obama downplayed the sanctions relief, describing it as reversible if Iran does not live up to the agreement, the Iranian government touted it.

In a series of tweets, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said investment and economic activity will increase, and the “atmosphere has changed” thanks to the sanctions “freeze.” He stressed that Iran seeks “peaceful development” of nuclear energy, and not a nuclear bomb, a claim the Israelis — who have strongly opposed this agreement — doubt.

Not only the Israeli’s, how about anyone who has watched the Iranians over the last 30 years. They have had their camel dung stained fingers in every major terrorists attack, with the possible exception of the 9/11 attack since the Reagan administration. Iran will simply ignore whatever promises they made, since in their religion, promises to infidels are meaningless.

Neville Obama

Now it is possible that this so called “6 month window” will be used by the Iranians for other purposes. You know, like getting their hands on ICBM tech so they can nuke us without worrying about transporting a bomb into the United States by ship or plane. As I said yesterday, this is Obama’s Munich Moment. Once the Iranians have the bomb, they will use it.

Thatisall

~The Angry Webmaster~

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 1.00 out of 5)
Loading...

 

AIPAC plays the long game on new Iran sanctions | Mondoweiss

In a recent policy memo, AIPAC ran through the deal’s details and expressed considerable skepticism over an interim agreement that contains “implicit acceptance of Iranian enrichment.” What they didn’t do, though, is press for … The memo criticizes the Geneva accord for allowing Iran to continue to have a nuclear program. AIPAC laments that Iran still retains the … in the Middle East, US Politics · ? Israel shouldn’t rely on Obama’s word, says chair of (US) Center for National Interest …
http://mondoweiss.net/ — Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:37:55 -0800

AND SO IT BEGINS… Confusion surrounds Iran nuke deal …

After that is done, the six-month window would start, but she said: “I don’t have a specific timeline for you.” The deal calls for Iran to freeze parts of its nuclear program, including halting enrichment above 5 percent, and allows for billions in …
http://irasciblemusings.com/ — Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:42:22 -0800
Danon said, “We cannot allow ourselves to make a mistake. If it is a bad … The deal reached Sunday reportedly halts the installation of new centrifuges, but allows Iran to keep current centrifuges used to enrich uranium. The agreement caps …
http://www.wnd.com/ — Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:01:00 -0800
The interim agreement is thus viewed by the US as a milestone in achieving the initial objectives of this “roll-back” strategy – by destroying Iran’s 20-percent enriched uranium, halting the completion of Arak heavy water reactor and the installation of … freezing the number of centrifuges and imposing a low-ceiling on enrichment – according to Kerry “3.5 percent,” even though the agreement specifically says 5 percent, and subjecting Iran’s program to unprecedented intrusive inspection, …
http://alethonews.wordpress.com/ — Wed, 27 Nov 2013 07:17:37 -0800

Iran FM admits to parliament the deal was not perfect | Ya Libnan …

Western nations and the Israelis have long accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapons capability alongside its civilian programme, charges denied by Tehran, which insists its uranium enrichment is purely for energy and medical research. Some parliamentarians, led by … “We are worried about the consequences of the agreement, and we communicate (this disquiet) with the government to find a more prudent and accurate way,” said Hosseinian. “The wording of the agreement about …
http://www.yalibnan.com/ — Wed, 27 Nov 2013 05:59:57 -0800

Fortenberry views nuclear deal with Iran with caution (AUDIO)

The U.S. insists the agreement does not grant Iran the right to enrich uranium. Yet, Iranian officials have trumpeted just the opposite. Fortenberry says it is difficult to determine whether the Iranian officials are playing to the domestic audience or …
http://nebraskaradionetwork.com/ — Wed, 27 Nov 2013 05:52:48 -0800
Despite its obvious weaknesses, and undaunted by the usual hyperbole of the Obama administration and its bearers, beaters, and apologists, led by John (“unbelievably small”) Kerry, I think the Geneva agreement over the Iranian nuclear program is … At that point, a nuclear exchange would be practically inevitable, even if it were initiated by one of the Muslim countries in the region tacitly allowing a terrorist group to deliver a suitcase bomb in a container ship and then unctuously …
http://www.ruthfullyyours.com/ — Wed, 27 Nov 2013 03:30:01 -0800
“The goal of the government is to break the sanctions regime and to remove them for the nation,” Rouhani said in a television interview. “Iran’s nuclear rights will be observed under [the Non-Proliferation Treaty], and [it] will continue enrichment.
http://test.dailycaller.com/ — Wed, 27 Nov 2013 03:11:50 -0800
Share my Musings on Social Media

About Angry Webmaster

I am the Angry Webmaster! Fear Me!
This entry was posted in Moonbat, News of the Day, Stupidity and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to About that Iran nuclear deal

  1. About that Iran nuclear deal – #angercentralarchives http://t.co/n1yPXgkmGB

    0
    0
  2. About that Iran nuclear deal – #angercentralarchives http://t.co/7ru04Yonfd

    0
    0
  3. nedb (@nedb) says:

    About that Iran nuclear deal http://t.co/fU63l6FnmE #angercentral #iran #tcot #israel #nukes #munichagreement #tcot #liveshotkerry #scoamf

    0
    0
  4. About that Iran nuclear deal http://t.co/C0Q1kPFa3L #angercentral #iran #tcot #israel #nukes #munichagreement #tcot

    0
    0
  5. About that Iran nuclear deal http://t.co/65X6DMVrw0 #angercentral #iran #tcot #israel #nukes #munichagreement #tcot http://t.co/xrrXTJwEb9

    0
    0

Leave a Reply