Bloomberg still thinking about running for tyrant

Good day all. With the New Hampshire primary over, and the Democrat Establishment’s choice having been crushed at the polls, the moonbats are looking for someone, anyone who can take out Comrade Bernie. This brings us to the former mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg.

King Bloomberg

I wrote about how he was talking about jumping in as an independent candidate a few weeks ago. Well, he’s getting closer to running and many people think it would be a great idea. Here’s a few details from Fox News:

Who won in New Hampshire?

Why that would be Donald Trump and Comrade Bernie Sanders, although the Democrats are doing everything they can to rig the contest in Cankles favor.

The ambitions of Michael Bloomberg.

eye roll

Great, just what we need. Another tyrannical megalomaniac in the White House.

The former New York City mayor has hinted that if the 2016 presidential contest came down to a race between extreme candidates like Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders, he might throw his hat in the ring.

Comrade Bernie is extreme. Trump is not. He is something you’ve never been Bloomies, a patriot.

His calculus is that the mainstream American voter might not be won over by a self-proclaimed Democratic Socialist or by a blustery billionaire who trades in insults and sound bites but who may flame out over the course of a long and arduous campaign.

Obviously, Bloomies is using the new Common Core math system. Trump may be great at sound bites, but he’s also putting together a plan to fix the problems slimeballs like you have caused. Flaming out has been the hope and desire of the GOP(e) since Trump announced. It ain’t happening.

The New Hampshire primary may give Bloomberg a push.

Right off a cliff if he’s stupid enough to enter the race.

Bloomberg is also looking at the GOP side, where Donald Trump capitalized on his huge crowds to post a decisive win, unlike in Iowa where he came in second.

Please. Trump didn’t do a lot of spending or campaigning in Iowa and he was only a few points behind Ted Cruz. In New Hampshire, he buried the second place winner, coming in ahead of Kasich by about 15 points.

Trump may well have benefited from the rules in New Hampshire, which allows independents to vote in their contest of choice – Republican or Democratic.

That I can confirm. I personally am not a member of any party and pulled a Republican ballot.

My guess: Trump drew a lot of left-leaning, blue collar independents who in the past would have lined up behind Hillary.

I see that Fox News is still in denial over Trump.

His appeal is not conservative; it is disruptive.

No, his appeal is that he speaks his mind and doesn’t play Politically Correct games. There is also the problem of the “so called” establishment conservatives and how we have been lied to by them for decades. The Republican base has had it with the likes of Bush and the others. Getting back to His Imperious Majesty, Michael Bloomberg…

Mayor Bloomberg has expressed disdain for the tenor of the race, and many may agree that the substance of the debate is an insult to American voters.

On the Establishment side, both GOP(e) and PLFD, you would be correct. But then Bloomies has disdain for anything or anyone who doesn’t kiss his ass.

Undoubtedly, he imagines elevating the discourse.

[youtuber youtube=’http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gbp_JQ7RxqM’]

You have got to be kidding!

We do have serious problems in the country that require attention, and Bloomberg is a seasoned executive with a proven record of accomplishment in both the private and public sectors.

Yeah, like banning soda, salt, his outright hatred of the 2nd Amendment, his belief that people are generally to stupid to be allowed to make their own decisions, yep, a great record of accomplishments.

Mr. Bloomberg’s priorities, which include gun control and trying to confront climate change, are not necessarily those of the majority of Americans, but for sure he would find a following.

foreward over the cliff

Yeah, the same sort of sheep that followed Obama no doubt. Basically people who are to stupid to run their own lives.

He’s a pragmatic man with lofty policy goals who could financially support a serious campaign.

Now, he is a power mad jerk with a serious Napoleon complex. If Bloomies does actually come into the race as an independent, he will take votes primarily from the Democrats. His one advantage is that most people don’t know what a tyrannical dwarf he actually is.

He hates anyone other than his personal security detail having guns. If he had his way, he would confiscate every single one. His tendency to ban things people like because he considers them bad for you, such as banning Big Gulp soft drinks. That attempt was ended by the courts.

Once people see what a creep he is, and you know that Trump will stomp on him like the insect he’s always been, Bloomberg will end up wasting a lot of money and wrecking the Democrat candidate, whoever the elites decide that will be. (What? You thought the Democrat voters were choosing the nominee? Silly person)

Thatisall

~The Angry Webmaster~

[yasr_visitor_votes size=”medium”]

Share my Musings on Social Media

About Angry Webmaster

I am the Angry Webmaster! Fear Me!
This entry was posted in Moonbat, News of the Day, Second Amendment, The Good Idea Fairy and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Bloomberg still thinking about running for tyrant

  1. And I just heard a while ago that Bloomies has decided that he won’t run as an independent. Probably moping over the recent veto override by the West Virginia legislature now allowing constitutional carry for everyone over 21. (18 with a permit)

    0
    0
  2. FriarBob says:

    Technically speaking, Trump is extreme… just he’s an extreme patriot, which few (if any) politicians have done more than pretend to be for the last few decades… Cruz sure seems to be too, but you know that the communist party is just BEGGING for a chance to sue him over ineligibility.

    But I still don’t rate ANY of them that high. Maybe put those two at around a 25 on a scale of 100. Its just that almost everybody else is a 2 (or a negative 1000) on that same scale.

    0
    0

Leave a Reply