Good day all. Recently, yet another left wing retard decided to try and take a shot at President Trump. The criminal didn’t get to him and was stopped by the Secret Service and is now in jail awaiting trial.
As the defendant, there are a number legal proceedings that need to be carried out. Most of these take place before a magistrate rather than a federal judge. Federal Magistrates handle the routine matters that don’t require any real discussions before a judge. Magistrates are employees of the court and are not confirmed by the Senate.
Personally, I think they need to be seriously restricted or even abolished and here is one big reason. Currently, the criminal in question was brought before a magistrate, one Judge Zia Faruqui. This moron actually apologized to the criminal for being put under suicide watch. Here are the details from Fox News:
A federal judge on Monday decried the prison treatment of President Donald Trump‘s alleged would-be assassin, and apologized to him for restrictive confinement imposed by jail staff.

Cole Allen, 31, has been in federal custody since prosecutors say he attempted to gain access to the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner ballroom and kill Trump along with other high-level government officials.
And he will never be released until his sentence is completed, once the trial and adjudication are done. While his lawyer is going to try and get him released on his own recognizance or low bail, this clown shot a federal agent and tried to assassinate the President of the United States. He’s not going anywhere.
Apparently, the criminal was put on a suicide watch and put into a special cell where he could be monitored. (They don’t want another Epstein incident) This isn’t all that pleasant since it means that the subject is monitored 24/7 to make sure he doesn’t kill himself or otherwise suffer an “Accident.” Apparently this jumped up moron of a magistrate didn’t like that.
Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui told an attorney representing the Department of Corrections (DOC) that he was “fascinated and disturbed” by Allen’s treatment in jail. Allen was placed on suicide watch when he was first imprisoned.
I would agree that Faruqui is disturbed. Of course my idea of his being disturbed may be different from what he thinks being disturbed is.

Suicide watch protocols mandated that Cole remain on a 24-hour lockdown in a “safe cell” and have no phone access to call or receive visits from anyone other than his legal team, according to the motion. His lawyers also wanted him to be able to obtain a tablet to assist in his legal defense. He was also allegedly denied a copy of the Bible despite more than one request.

Now there is a reason they put this clown on a suicide watch. He charged a Secret Service security checkpoint with armed agents, some of those agents had automatic weapons. (At least one had an MP7. IYKYK)
Prosecutor Jocelyn Ballantine reasoned that since Allen told investigators he did not expect to survive the alleged attack, he could be a danger to himself.
As I recall, the last one they took alive was also talking about suck starting a shotgun. The last thing the DoJ wants is this bozo avoiding the trial, probable conviction and lengthy prison term by eliminating himself. Apparently, this magistrate either doesn’t believe this ninny was a suicide risk or he was fine with him offing himself.
But an incredulous Faruqui wasn’t convinced by that argument, drawing comparisons between Allen and defendants arrested for rioting at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
“To me, it’s extremely disturbing that he was put in five-point restraints, a person with no criminal history,” Faruqui said, later adding that Allen is presumed innocent. “It’s troubling. I never heard of one Jan. 6 defendant who was put in five-point restraints or in a safe cell. If the only way to keep him safe is the most punitive thing, that’s a problem.”

For some reason, this nitwit then brought up the January 6 political prisoners.
The judge said even Jan. 6 defendants were only housed in a Correctional Treatment Facility (CTF), a less restrictive form of prison housing.
“Pardons may erase convictions, but they don’t erase history,” he said. “They were hanging gallows outside.”
The entire J6 response is now being seen as a massive violation of people’s constitutional rights by the Garland Department of (In)justice. It seems that every day more and more comes out on just how abusive the DoJ and FBI were. Add to that, none of the people involved tried to assassinate the president, or anyone else for that matter.
“What am I to say to Allen that this is going to be a fair process if we’re putting him in a safe cell when he’s not supposed to be in there?” Faruqui said. “At a minimum I should be apologizing to him. We are obligated to make sure he’s taken care of. Mr. Allen, I’m sorry that things have not been the way they are supposed to.”

He also addressed Allen directly.
“The jail is going to let me know by tomorrow morning about what’s going on with your housing situation,” he said, “If not, I’m going to have more questions for them. We should be able to get you into the medium portion of the jail, with windows.”
“Legal visits, ask for legal visits, do not accept that these things are acceptable,” Faruqui advised. “We will get you the Bible. If we can get someone vegan food, we can get you a Bible, we can make sure you’re not in five-point restraints.”
This magistrate has crossed a number of lines. I have no doubt that the DoJ is already looking to have him removed from any further actions regarding this criminal. I won’t be at all surprised if the DoJ isn’t looking at having this moron dismissed. Since magistrates are not confirmed by the Senate, they have not life appointments.

Since this idiot’s rulings, people have been both mocking him and looking into his background. It’s about what you would expect. He’s a Libtard Moonbat who should not be anywhere near a courtroom, other than being a defendant. Here is what Fox News found out:
The magistrate judge who apologized to suspected would-be Trump assassin Cole Allen for his treatment inside a Washington, D.C., jail during a Monday emergency motion hearing has been criticized for his standoffishness with the Trump administration over the city’s crime crackdown, and praised for his career-long commitment to DEI.
Allen’s defense on Sunday filed a motion for an emergency hearing on his jail treatment, which was scheduled for Monday. Later on Sunday, they withdrew the motion when they learned that Allen was no longer in the jail’s suicide protocol, which dictated his placement in the safe cell.
That should have put an end to this. From what I’ve seen, it was medical people who recommended the protocol, not the DoJ or the jail authorities. Faruqui decided that he was going to show everyone that he’s in charge.
Despite the withdrawal, Faruqui hauled the defense, prosecution and a Department of Corrections (DOC) attorney into court for the emergency hearing where he decried Allen’s treatment.
This magistrate, (I refuse to call him a judge), is a typical Libtard Democrat and see’s his role as stopping President Trump.
Faruqui has been involved in multiple spats with the Trump administration and has a long history of spewing left-wing talking points from the bench and beyond.

Apparently, he’s a racist and a big proponent of DEI.
The Washington Council of Lawyers wrote a letter in support of Faruqui for a potential 2023 appointment to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
“Judge Faruqui’s record demonstrates a deep commitment to pro bono representation, public interest law, fairness, and diversity—as well as keen analytical skills and sound judicial decision-making,” the letter says.
It later adds that he has “devoted much of his career to diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts,” and twice cites his commitment to “criminal justice reform.”
Let me guess. His idea of Criminal Justice Reform involves releasing criminals based on their skin color? Well, technically he can’t just drop charges as I understand things, but he can set bail to $25 or something. I suspect he would have loved to do just that for the criminal who tried to assassinate President Trump.

He also hates Immigration and Customs Enforcement apparently.
After a Venezuelan illegal alien was arrested by masked federal agents in D.C., Faruqui slammed the Trump administration.
“I’d say we live in a surreal world right now,” Faruqui said at a court hearing for Christian Enrique Carías Torres last year, according to The Washington Post.
“This is not consistent with what I understand the United States of America to be,” he continued. “You should be treated with basic human dignity. We don’t have a secret police.“
This pinhead was complaining about ICE agents having to hide their faces, (Not all do by the way), because of threats by people of the same political mentality as this fool threatening them and their families. He also appears to be fine with millions of criminals crossing into the United States. He’s also appears to be just fine with criminals of all stripes robbing, raping and murdering their way through the District of Columbia.
Last August, Trump sent federal law enforcement to D.C. to assist local authorities in combatting crime. That move was met with opposition from federal grand juries, some of whom declined to prosecute cases brought before them.
The DOJ then brought the same cases in front of local grand juries. Faruqui refused to accept the local indictments in at least seven cases, and trashed the Trump administration in the process, WOUB Public Media reported.
He called Trump’s crackdown a “constitutional crisis” and said, “the rule of law is being flushed down the toilet,” according to The Washington Post.
“I am afraid right now, and that’s not what this country is founded on,” he said at the time. “What makes America great is the rule of law. … It will not, on any of the judges in this courthouse, be broken down.”

This piece of walking feces is exactly the problem Washington D.C. has and one of the reasons that the Trump Administration called out the National Guard. Crime was absolutely out of control and this jerk is part of the problem.
Trump appointee and U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro has often responded in kind to Faruqui’s claims.
“Judge Faruqui has never really met someone with an illegal gun that he hasn’t found some compassion for,” Pirro said in a response to a reporter who asked about Faruqui’s assertion that her office has lost all credibility.
I have a few issues with Jeanine Pirro, mostly regarding the 2nd Amendment and her responses in court that seem to be designed to subvert it. However, she is also right when it comes to people like Faruqui. He is a major problem. One of his problems is the bail system at the federal level.
“For better or for worse, we do not have cash bond [in the federal system],” he said. “I think the idea again, is that someone who’s presumed innocent, we do not want to bring into that — we’ve already appointed them counsel if they can’t afford it — we don’t want to make a barrier to their release when the law directs release based on income issues and concerns about income equity.”
Now I don’t have any knowledge of how the bail system works on any level other than you put up money to be released pending trial. The money is to make sure you will show up for that trial.
He continued, saying that in D.C. and most other federal courts they focus on conditioned releases.
“So, removing internet access is something that we do. Having a third-party custodian there 24/7, you know, using Ring cameras to see who’s coming into the house, you know, removing bedroom doors so someone doesn’t have any privacy in the house. Finding ways to incarcerate people at home and home incarceration instead of having direct financial burdens and other ways to make sure they are still keeping the community safe but allowing them to be outside of incarceration while presumed innocent.”
Again, I don’t know how the system works on the Federal level. I do know that one reason not to grant bail or other forms of release pending trial is what the defendant has been charged with. Crimes like murder, rape or a long criminal record tends to be a reason people are not released on bond. I also know that a large number of the J6 defendants were denied pretrial release, and many never even got a trial before President Trump’s pardons.
Those people would have shown up in court. Most of the low life criminals that are generally “Customers” of the criminal courts, if granted bail, will not show up. It looks like this bozo will try to find any reason to release a criminal. I wonder how many of those criminals he let out went on to commit even more crimes?

Since this idiots remarks, he has been soundly and roundly slammed across the Internet as people found out about his political predilections. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if he wasn’t trying to figure out a way to release the criminal who tried to assassinate President Trump. The good news is he won’t be handling the actual trial. However, he needs to be invited to seek other opportunities elsewhere in the Private sector.
Thatisall
~The Angry Webmaster~




