Good day all. Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is the most incompetent Supreme Court justice that has ever been appointed and confirmed. She is also blindingly stupid.
Recently, KBJ, or as she is more commonly known as, Biden’s SCOTUS DEI hire, has managed to piss off everyone else on the Court, including the other two Democrats. Now she has decided that lower court judges should ignore the Supreme Court. Here are the details from the Federalist:
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said it’s “absolutely a legitimate question” as to whether lower court judges should defy the Supreme Court when it comes to emergency docket decisions.
No you moron, it isn’t, but then you don’t consider the law or the Constitution of the United States to be binding either when your “Feelz” are involved.
U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel of the District of South Carolina was interviewing Jackson at the American Law Institute earlier this month when he said: “I have found, as a district judge, it mystifying at times, where an emergency docket decision of maybe just two or three pages, appears to countermand longstanding Supreme Court precedent. Are we to apply the brief, the short stay decision, or denial of stay? Or are we to follow 50 years of precedent? It’s a perplexing thing to do.”
I can see why Gergel is confused. He’s an Obama judge and they are generally all easily confused. Speaking of easily confused.
Jackson said it is “absolutely a legitimate question and a legitimate concern.”
No, it isn’t.
“I mean, what is a lower court judge to do after the Supreme Court has intervened early on to tell everyone who’s likely to win the case?” Jackson continued, later adding it’s “mystifying” that the Supreme Court could stay a decision even after a lower court judge “made findings of fact” or held hearings.
What is so tough to understand? The Supreme Court is THE Supreme Court. All the lower courts are just that. Lower/inferior courts. Those courts can be abolished at any time by Congress. When the Supreme Court issues a ruling, the inferior courts are bound to uphold it. Now if there is case with new information that can cause SCOTUS to reverse itself, then yes, lower courts can rule in a way that goes against the precedent. Usually, when this happens, a stay is put in place so that the appeals process can proceed.
Jackson’s comments are especially insane given that there is nothing new about lower courts being bound by the Supreme Court’s guidance (including an emergency order). But this wasn’t the only time Jackson was seemingly unaware how the court she sits on works.
Insert something no shit captain obvious
The high court ruled 6-3 in Louisiana v. Callais that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is designed to enforce the Constitution’s prohibition on intentional racial discrimination, but not force states to engage in race-based discrimination by creating majority-minority districts. The court held that Louisiana’s congressional map that had two majority-Black districts was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
Due to the dates of the state primary, the Court fast tracked the ruling.
Shortly after, the Supreme Court released an order in an 8-1 decision that, as described by The Federalist’s Shawn Fleetwood, would “fast-track the transmission of its decision to the lower courts rather than wait 32 days, as per normal custom.” The decision was made “in accordance with existing SCOTUS rules,” as Fleetwood pointed out. The decision allowed Louisiana to move toward new maps mid-election cycle rather than using the current, unconstitutional maps.
And Louisiana promptly moved to fix the problem. In fact, a number of states moved to fix the problem of racially gerrymandered districts. This set off the Democrats since all of these “Black majority” districts were actually used to insure that no Republican could ever win. A case in point is Tennessee. The legislature did a redistricting that ended a racially gerrymandered district in Memphis.
What absolutely destroyed the Democrats claims that black only districts had to exist in order to insure black representation was who has held the seat for years. It was a white, male liberal heterosexual. The last election, he defeated a black female Republican.
Jackson issued a dissent claiming the court’s 8-1 decision “has spawned chaos in the State of Louisiana.”
Actually, no, it didn’t. They were fully prepared for the decision no matter which way it went.
“Not content to have decided the law, [the Supreme Court] now takes steps to influence its implementation,” Jackson wrote. “The Court unshackles itself from both constraints today and dives into the fray. And just like that, those principles give way to power. Because this abandon is unwarranted and unwise, respectfully, I dissent.”
That stupidity set off the other justices.
Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, wrote a concurring opinion that said Jackson’s charges “cannot go unanswered.”
Alito said that Jackson’s position “would require that the 2026 congressional elections in Louisiana be held under a map that has been held to be unconstitutional.” Alito added Jackson’s dissent offers one “trivial” reason for her proposed course of action, and another that is “baseless and insulting.”
That is about Jackson’s speed. She is blindingly stupid. However, she is carrying out her instructions from the Democrat Party, which is to protect the interests of The Democrat Party and crush anything supporting the Republicans and/or President Trump.
“The dissent goes on to claim that our decision represents an unprincipled use of power. … That is a groundless and utterly irresponsible charge,” Alito wrote. “What principle has the Court violated? The principle that Rule 45.3’s 32-day default period should never be shortened even when there is good reason to do so? The principle that we should never take any action that might unjustifiably be criticized as partisan?”
It’s hard to ignore that Jackson is treating standard functions of the court as possibly illegitimate whenever they happen to produce an outcome she dislikes.
That is a major problem. Jackson’s antics and her flagrant attacks on both the Court and other justices is something that I can’t recall seeing or reading about in the entire history of the Supreme Court of the United States. I have a suspicion that Jackson may be the first Supreme Court justice removed from the court by Congress. That or she will be pressured to step down.
What is really worrying are the announced plans by the Democrats if they regain control of the Senate and presidency in 2028. They want to fill the court with additional KBJ-like morons to issue ruling that the Democrats want. They see Ketanji Brown Jackson as the template of what they want for a justice. The ruling that would come down would essentially end the United States as a Constitutional Republic. What would come next?
It’s time to start working to remove Ketanji Brown Jackson from the bench in a constitutional manner. If that means impeaching her in the House and convicting her in the senate for malfeasance and incompetence, so be it.
Thatisall
(2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...
~The Angry Webmaster~
