Good day all. Recently, the Supreme Court issued a ruling overturning yet another order by a moonbat COB judge designed to block President Trump. This one involved President Trump’s order regarding mail in ballots.
As has been the case, the administration, once the COB judge, following the instructions of the Democrat Party, went to the Supreme Court and got the order struck down. Per standard SCOTUS policy in these cases, the Leftwing justices sided with the Democrat Party. However, Ketanji Brown Jackson once again had to demonstrate why she is considered the dumbest member of the Supreme court. Here are the details from Fox News:
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson sharply rebuked her colleagues’ decision allowing the Trump administration to move forward with parts of its mail-voting executive order, warning that the ruling could create election chaos and leave states trapped between filing legal challenges too early or too late.
“This ruling violates well-established precedents concerning this Court’s equitable discretion and needlessly injects chaos and uncertainty into the upcoming midterm elections,” the court’s junior liberal justice wrote in a 23-page dissent Monday.
Jackson said the decision “lets another shoe drop in the Kafkaesque nightmare that our precedents have been steadily creating for certain plaintiffs who seek to bring election-related challenges.”
Jackson is an idiot. She is also the most incompetent justice ever to have been confirmed to the Supreme Court. So bad is she that Justice Barrett once wrote in regards to another dissent by the DEI hire that Jackson cold be ignored as she has nothing to offer the court. Jackson is also known for her word salad questions to counsel. She will spend minutes talking about something that has little bearing to the case and is basically a political statement.
Compare this to Justice Thomas who, for decades, rarely said anything. When he did, people paid attention on both sides of the political aisle. When Ketjani Brown Jackson speaks, people listen because they want to find out what asinine stupidity will emerge from her mouth.
The court granted the Trump administration’s request to stay a lower-court injunction that had blocked implementation of portions of President Donald Trump’s March executive order in 23 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia.
That case is actually something for another post. President Trump issued an EO with the idea to secure the next election and fix the problems with mail in ballots. They didn’t rule on whether or not the order itself was constitutional and lawful. They just put an end to the restraining order issued by the Democrat judge. (Which she ignored)
“The Court’s disposition of this application does not mean that any measure taken by the Government to implement the Order will necessarily be lawful,” the majority wrote. “On that score, time will tell.”
Jackson took aim at that reasoning, arguing that the states were already confronting election-planning costs, threats of prosecution and uncertainty over possible changes to mail-ballot procedures.
Frankly, there should be no mail in ballots. If, for some reason, you can’t get to your polling place on election day, then you go to city hall or some other designated location, you fill out an absentee ballot, put it into and seal an envelope, and you hand it to the clerk who puts it into the appropriate secured ballot box. I’ve done this myself when I knew I was going to be traveling on Election Day and knew I couldn’t get to the polls.
Mail in ballots are inherently insecure. Add to that, the complete lack of verification that the correct, eligible, person is the one who receives and fills out the ballot. Finally, there is the problem of ballots coming in long after the polls closed. These ballots need to be received by midnight on election day or they don’t count. Period. Full Stop.
She accused the majority of embracing what she called a “Catch-Me-If-You-Can approach” that could make it difficult for states to determine when an election-related challenge is ripe for judicial review.
The court has previously warned against courts changing election rules too close to Election Day. Jackson argued Monday’s decision creates the opposite problem by telling states that some challenges can also come too early.
The problem here is that the Democrats know that unless they have the ability to commit outright election fraud, they are going to get their heads handed to them by the voters. They are, well I don’t to say conspiring, but considering how these cases always seem to end up in from of Clinton, Obama and Biden judges, getting the courts to block the administration’s plans to make sure that the next election is secure and honest.
“The Court does a disservice to all concerned by distorting Article III standing and ripeness principles to issue a ruling that contributes to pre-election chaos instead of quashing it,” she wrote.
I had to refresh my memory on Article III. This is the section of the Constitution that set up the Supreme Court and described how the lower courts are enabled, (Section 2) and instructions on the cases they are allowed to hear. One segment of section 2 that I had forgotten about was this:
The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour.
Normally, the only way to remove a judge is through impeachment. This part references their actions as judges. Without question, the Democrat COB judges are not conducting themselves in a way that would be considered with good behavior. Section 3 deals with Treason. I think that Jackson may have crossed the “Good Behavior” line a few times with her antics both in and out of court. For instance:
Jackson also accused the majority of a “lack of situational awareness,” arguing that the administration was seeking emergency relief while simultaneously maintaining that the consequences of the executive order remained uncertain.
This all started back in March when President Trump issued his executive order regarding voter fraud, mail in ballots, etc.
Trump’s March 31 executive order directs the Department of Homeland Security to take steps toward compiling state-specific lists of U.S. citizens and instructs the attorney general to prioritize certain investigations and prosecutions involving allegedly ineligible voters.
And boy have the found a bunch. In New Jersey alone, they have identified over 6000 noncitizens on the voter rolls and I believe they have identified some 400 who may have actually cast ballots. They’ve already convicted at least three of doing so.
The order also directs the U.S. Postal Service to pursue rules governing mail-in and absentee ballots, including ballot-envelope requirements, tracking barcodes and state-specific voter lists.
And this is what is setting off the Democrats. One of the things the Postal Service is looking to do is make sure that the ballots they deliver are going to actual voters. One of the ways they can check this is to look at the voter rolls and the home addresses of voters. If they see 100 people registered to vote at a single address, that would send up flares that fraud is being planned or is underway.
Jackson closed her dissent by calling the case “not a close call,” and arguing that allowing the administration to proceed risked confusion and last-minute disruption ahead of the midterms.
“When the Government’s obvious goal is to interfere with the Plaintiff States’ practices and prerogatives in a manner that the Constitution does not authorize,” Jackson wrote, “it is both a serious legal error and a grave misuse of our equitable emergency powers to let the Executive proceed even one step further.”
I am rapidly reaching the conclusion that something very drastic will need to be done regarding these Activist judges, including at the Supreme Court level. By drastic, I mean actual arrests and criminal charges of, potentially, conspiracy along with aiding and abetting. This isn’t just in regards to mail in ballots, but for actions these retards have been taking for years that have damaged this country and, in a few cases, gotten people killed.
As to what happens next? I think it will depend on the midterms. The DEI hire, Ketjani Brown Jackson needs to be removed from the Supreme Court. She should be pressured, along with the other two Liberals, to consider that perhaps she isn’t the right person and will step down. Who am I kidding? That narcissist thinks she is the most brilliant justice to ever sit on the Supreme Court. She is going to have to be removed and that will take an impeachment and a conviction. Her Bad Behavior towards the other justices certainly is grounds according to Article III.
Thatisall
~The Angry Webmaster~
