Good day all, prepare to be outraged. I know I am. The title of this post is misleading. This isn’t a case of a moron pretending to be a judge trying to implement Sharia law. No this is about a moron pretending to be a judge aiding and abetting in a sexual assault.
Now this judge, one Deana McDonald, presided over a case in which a 17 year old girl, Savannah Dietrich, was sexually assaulted and her attackers basically got a plea bargain that protected them. Apparently, Ms. Dietrich was not involved with the plea discussions and found out about them after the fact.
Here are a few details from Yahoo! News:
A Kentucky girl who was sexually assaulted could face contempt of court charges after she tweeted the names of her juvenile attackers.
Savannah Dietrich, the 17-year-old victim, was frustrated by a plea deal reached late last month by the two boys who assaulted her, and took to Twitter to expose them–violating a court order to keep their names confidential.
Who in their right mind is going to protect the identity of a couple of, well for lack of a better term, rapists? Apparently an incompetent DA and a Judge who should have known better. What did these two fine, upstanding citizens plead to?
On June 26, the boys pleaded guilty to first-degree sexual abuse and misdemeanor voyeurism. Terms of their plea agreement were not released.
And what did these two do?
Dietrich said she was sexually assaulted by two teen boys she knew in August 2011. She had been drinking at a gathering, she said, and became unconscious. Months later she learned that pictures of the incident had been taken and shared with others.
I won’t go into the underage drinking Ms. Dietrich engaged in. However, once she lost consciousness, she was no longer able to make any decisions in favor of or opposed to what happened to her. Yes, girls do get drunk and make really bad decisions, but the operative phrase here is “Make a bad decision.” Ms. Dietrich had passed out. Last I heard, you do things to an unconscious female, (or male for that matter), you get to spend a lot of quality time in a small room with bars on the window.
Dietrich and her parents went to Louisville Metro Police, who eventually charged the two juvenile defendants with first-degree sexual abuse, a felony, and misdemeanor voyeurism, according information contained in the court motion filed by the newspaper.
Now the police don’t make the charges, if I understand how things work. They may arrest you for a crime but it is the prosecutors office that makes the formal charge. In this case, it looks like the prosecutor just wanted to broom this case.
The teens pleaded guilty to those charges in late June, though Dietrich and her family say they were unaware of the plea bargain and recommended sentence until just before it was announced in court — and were upset with what they felt was a slap on the wrist for the attackers.
I bet they didn’t get any jail time, their records will be sealed and they can go on to do something like this again. As you might expect, there has been no comment from the prosecutors office.
Now Ms. Dietrich basically said “To Hell with the judge!” and sent out a tweet from her twitter account identifying her assailants.
Angry after the June 26 hearing, Dietrich posted several tweets on her Twitter account naming the two teens who pleaded guilty.
“They said I can’t talk about it or I’ll be locked up,” Dietrich tweeted. “So I’m waiting for them to read this and lock me up. ____ justice.
I don’t have the names of these two twerps so I can’t name them. However, thanks to this judge, it looks like Ms. Dietrich will spend more time in jail than her two attackers. Yep, that sure sounds like something you see in your typical mooselim country.
When I saw this I went off the deep end. You have no idea how many ideas I had in dealing with the two punks, the judge and the prosecutors. None of them are legal and all of them would result in lengthy prison sentences and a possible date with a needle in the arm. No, I prefer not moving to the House of Many Doors thank you. Instead I will ask you to read about the injustices being done to this young woman and ask you to take your concerns to the appropriate authorities in that state. Removal from the bench and the dismissal of everyone associated with this case in the prosecutors office is a good start.
I know how Emperor Misha I of the Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler would respond to this injustice. “Rope, Tree, Judge, Prosecutor, some assembly required.” I’m sure he will chime in as soon as he sees this. (After he calms down a bit so he can type coherently)
Thatisall
~The Angry Webmaster~


When did Sharia law come to America? – #angercentralarchives http://t.co/H161dep1vZ
Sounds appropriate but infeasible, a minimum is removal from office and disbarment.
I was under the impression that if a judge or court is contemptible, you can’t be held in contempt. This judge, the DA, the defense attornies, and the two ratbags who assaulted the girl are all beyond contemptible. I can certainly think of some appropriate punishments for the bunch of them, involving wooden stakes, short pieces of rope, and an ant bed.