Good day all. Since the election, we have seen the Democrats trying to get the electors to not vote for Trump, and instead vote for Felonia. Most states do not allow Electors to vote for anyone other than whoever won the state. However, a few electors have announced they will not support the candidate their state’s chose.
A few on the Democrat side have said they can’t vote for Felonia due to her criminal history. Now we have one who says he will not vote for Donald Trump. His name is Christopher Suprun and he is in Dallas, Texas. Here are some of the details from the New York Times:
I am a Republican presidential elector, one of the 538 people asked to choose officially the president of the United States. Since the election, people have asked me to change my vote based on policy disagreements with Donald J. Trump. In some cases, they cite the popular vote difference. I do not think president-elects should be disqualified for policy disagreements. I do not think they should be disqualified because they won the Electoral College instead of the popular vote. However, now I am asked to cast a vote on Dec. 19 for someone who shows daily he is not qualified for the office.
I’m not going to post the entirety of Mr. Suprun’s letter to the New York Times. Would you believe he also used Star Wars as another justification? Follow the link and read it for yourselves. I will just highlight a few of his moronic reasons for becoming a faithless elector.
Mr. Trump goes out of his way to attack the cast of “Saturday Night Live” for bias. He tweets day and night, but waited two days to offer sympathy to the Ohio State community after an attack there. He does not encourage civil discourse, but chooses to stoke fear and create outrage.
He’s upset that Trump took a dump on Saturday Night Live? As to the attack in Ohio, there was a bit of confusion at first and Trump, like many others, waited to see what the real story was. Then Mr. Suprun doubles down on his idiocy. He starts by quoting the Federalist papers to try and justify himself.
The United States was set up as a republic. Alexander Hamilton provided a blueprint for states’ votes. Federalist 68 argued that an Electoral College should determine if candidates are qualified, not engaged in demagogy, and independent from foreign influence. Mr. Trump shows us again and again that he does not meet these standards. Given his own public statements, it isn’t clear how the Electoral College can ignore these issues, and so it should reject him.
So you would rather put Felonia von Pantsuit into the White House instead? A person who is guilty of multiple crimes, and the only reason she isn’t cooling her heels in jail right now was a Department of Justice that has been utterly corrupted? If not her, then who do you want Mr. Suprun?
I believe electors should unify behind a Republican alternative, an honorable and qualified man or woman such as Gov. John Kasich of Ohio.
John Kasich? A candidate that was utterly rejected by pretty much everyone? A man who’s basic philosophy mirrors most of the Democrat Party platform? A man, who as governor of Ohio, has managed to tick off his own legislature by acting as a GOP(e) version of “I have a phone and a pen” Obama? That guy?
Now, a few things. Many electors have been receiving death threats and have been harassed by Progressives, Social Justice Warriors and moonbats. Although Mr. Suprun has made a public statement, and fully deserves any and all derision directed at him, I will not tolerate any form of harassment, let alone threats. (If I find out someone has threatened harm to Mr. Suprun, I will be the first to call the police)
Instead, contact the Republican Party in Texas and see if there is a way he can be removed as an Elector. Follow the law. Do not protest in front of his house or place of business, do not call his employer demanding he be fired, do nothing outside of the law. Instead, write letters to the editor and blog entries calling him out and telling him that he should step down if he can’t support Donald Trump. He won’t of course. He is a slimy, faithless, dishonorable snake. Perhaps he would be more at home in the Democrat Party. They reward lying, faithless worms.
Thatisall
~The Angry Webmaster~
[yasr_visitor_votes size=”large”]
