The unmasker unmasked?

Good day all. About a month ago, President Trump sent out a tweet that his transition team had been “Wiretapped.” This set off screeches from the usual Progressive subjects as well as a few RINO’s. (John McSlime, Lindsey Grahamnesty).

Then a couple of weeks ago, the head of the House Intelligence committee, Representative Nunes, announced that he had information that, while the Trump Tower wasn’t wiretapped, that the transition team had been caught up in a legal surveillance operation, and that the names of those people had been “Unmasked” and spread around various agencies. The goal was to have the names leaked, which they did, and one of those named, Michael Flynn resigned.

This set off the Democrats on the committee since Rep. Nunes informed President Trump of what he found as well as the Speaker of the House prior to informing the Democrats on the committee. Then there were accusations that Nunes was “Covering up” for Trump. One of the loudest mouths was the Democrats leader on the House Committee, Adam Schiff(less).

He led demands that Nunes recuse himself from the hearings. Others demanded an ethics investigation with a few of the real nuts demanding Nunes resign. Nunes refused of course and instead invited the Democrats on the committee to go to the secure location he went to so they too could review the documents. Apparently Schiff(less) did, since he suddenly quieted down last weekend on the talking heads shows.

Last night the news broke that they appear to have found who ordered the “Unmasking” of the names in the surveillance tapes. As expected, it was someone very high up in the Obama Administration. That person? Obama’s National Security Advisor, Susan Rice. Here are some of the details from Fox News:

Multiple sources tell Fox News that Susan Rice, former national security adviser under then-President Barack Obama, requested to unmask the names of Trump transition officials caught up in surveillance.

The unmasked names, of people associated with Donald Trump, were then sent to all those at the National Security Council, some at the Defense Department, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and then-CIA Director John Brennan – essentially, the officials at the top, including former Rice deputy Ben Rhodes.

Didn’t I read something about James Clapper denying that Trump’s transition team was spied on? If I did, it was just another lie from a proven liar. As for Susan Rice, she has been lying to the American people all throughout the Obama Regime. She came to the fore when she said that the Benghazi attack was caused by a Youtube video.

She then stonewalled investigators and pretty much perjured herself in front of Congress. As her reward, she went from being the U.N. Ambassador to being made Obama’s National Security Adviser. (A role that didn’t require confirmation from the Senate) Continuing with a report from the Washington Times:

The Obama administration’s national security adviser played a central role in “unmasking” several Trump campaign officials who had been swept up in U.S. surveillance operations against foreign targets during last year’s presidential election campaign, according to current White House officials and sources on Capitol Hill.

Susan E. Rice requested that names be provided for otherwise unidentified U.S. people in dozens of raw intelligence reports relating to the Trump campaign, the sources told The Washington Times on Monday.

While Ms. Rice’s actions and alleged interest in the Trump campaign appear to have been within her legal authority as national security adviser, the potentially explosive revelation has touched a nerve in Washington and stirred speculation that she could be called to testify on Capitol Hill about Russian election meddling.

Rice continued her lying.

Late last month on the PBS “NewsHour,” Ms. Rice was asked whether any Trump transition officials were the targets of incidental surveillance. She replied, “I know nothing about this.”

Now the 72 Hour rule is in effect, but if this holds up, and I suspect it will, at the very least Susan Rice is going to end up in front of a congressional investigative committee and be asked some very pointed questions. I suspect her answers will be something like “On the advice of counsel, I am invoking my rights under the 5^th Amendment of the Constitution and will not answer.” Funny how Progressives suddenly fall in love with the Constitution when they’re the ones in need of it’s protections, isn’t it?

The worst case scenario for Rice is an indictment and trial. If it goes there, and I’m hoping it will, she is looking at serious prison time. I wonder if she will continue to cover up for others in the Obama regime who may have been involved with this? I think we need to prepare for another “Watergate Summer.”

Thatisall

~The Angry Webmaster~

[yasr_visitor_votes size=”large”]