Good day all, Back in 2012, the Obama campaign was caught and heavily criticized for not using the verification system when accepting online credit card donations. This system verifies that the account is held by someone in the United States and will reject any foreign donations.
Instead of learning from their “mistake,” the Democrats are doubling down on taking in untraceable donations. Here are the details from Fox News:
Less than two months ahead of the presidential election – with concerns of foreign interference again at the forefront – a conservative political group is raising “serious concerns” about millions of donations reported by a major Democratic fundraising platform.
A preliminary computer analysis by the Take Back Action Fund, obtained exclusively by Fox News, has found that nearly half of all 2019 donations to ActBlue were made by people claiming to be unemployed.
Action Fund President John Pudner questioned the veracity of those donations and called it a loophole that must be closed for the sake of election integrity.
“After downloading hundreds of millions of [dollars in] donations to the Take Back Action Fund servers, we were shocked to see that almost half of the donations to ActBlue in 2019 claimed to be unemployed individuals,” he said. “The name of employers must be disclosed when making political donations, but more than 4.7 million donations came from people who claimed they did not have an employer. Those 4.7 million donations totaled $346 million ActBlue raised and sent to liberal causes.”
I would also question those donations. People who are out of work tend to not donate to anything. They are more concerned with keeping a roof over their heads and food on the table. Bluntly, this reeks to high heaven. Of course, ActBlue has an excuse.
ActBlue defends the integrity of its donations and said many come from retirees and people who aren’t counted as employed, such as homemakers.
According to the findings of the Action Fund – a nonprofit that aims to “educate the public on conservative solutions for political reform” – 48.4% of ActBlue donations last year, prior to the massive loss of jobs that came with the onslaught of the coronavirus pandemic, came from those who did not list an employer or who claimed to be unemployed. Pudner said the large number is a red flag that some donations may be illicit contributions from foreign interests attempting to impact U.S. elections.
Red flag? Perhaps the red flag with some yellow stars on it.

“It is hard to believe that at a time when the U.S. unemployment rate was less than 4 percent, that unemployed people had $346 million dollars to send to ActBlue for liberal causes,” Pudner said, adding that “4.7 million donations from people without a job … raised serious concerns.”
The Republican counterpart to ActBlue is called WinRed, and they posted their donation patterns. Interestingly, very few of the donations came from people claiming to be unemployed. WinRed also does something that Act Blue doesn’t do. Verify their donations.
“ActBlue’s insistence on refusing to allow banks to verify their donations is an invitation to foreign programmers or others to send money through them using fake American names, and we encourage them to start letting banks verify the identity of donors to stop the potential for millions of dollars to influence our election,” Pudner said.
Yeah, that will never happen. The last thing they want people to see is just how deeply in the tank the Democrat party is to the Chinese Communist party and other hostile powers.
“Auditing these suspect donations to determine if millions lied by indicating they were unemployed when in fact they were not, or if their names were just being used by a foreign programmer or someone else to move money without their knowledge, will take time,” Pudner said. “We’ve planned a series of forensic procedures to identify whether or not these donors of record exist or not, if they made the contributions themselves, and whether they were legally able, and whether or not they are potential ‘straw’ donors, making the contributions after being given the money and direction by someone else.”
I would say that the Department of Justice and the FBI should get involved. Forensic accounting is something the FBI used to be really good at. However, it will have to wait until after the reelection of President Trump. At that point, I have a suspicion that he is going to be taking the gloves off and instructing Attorney General Barr to begin a potential RICO investigation into the Democrat Party.
Both WinRed and ActBlue note on their donation pages that law requires donors to list their employer and occupation.
“The problem,” Pudner said, “is on the back end where ActBlue does not allow banks to verify the identity of the cardholder, meaning someone could buy endless gift cards and list any name they wanted and leave the employer line blank or type in words like ‘not employed,’ ‘unemployed.'”
“With half of ActBlue donors indicating they do not have an employer, we recommend they start letting their payment processors verify donations to stop any foreign or other illicit donations by simply listing themselves as an unemployed American,” Pudner added.
And that will never happen. The last thing the Progressive Liberal Democratic CommuNazis want is to tell people where their funds actually come from. One of the biggest and most corrupt organizations was the Clinton Foundation, which has the nickname, the “Clinton Slushfund.” They raked in millions and bought favors from Felonia von Pantsuit, both as a senator and as Secretary of State.
The Democrats have been pulling this stunt for decades. The only real Republican equivalent was Nixon’s CREEP, and it was their actions that really brought in the campaign finance laws now in effect. It’s long past time to start digging into the Democrat party and determining if they fit the definition of a “Continuing Criminal Enterprise.” Of course, of Demtnia Joe and Heels Up Harris manage to win, that investigation will never happen.

Thatisall
~The Angry Webmaster~




