A tale of Two Justices. Thomas vs Brown Jackson

Good day all. The recent decision declaring Affirmative Action in collage admissions is unconstitutional, (Which it always was, and racist as well), has set off the usual racists on the left. What it has also done is show the differences between Justice Thomas, the two Obama justices and Biden’s pick for the court.

The decisions, (There were two cases), were decided 6-3 and 6-2 with Justice Brown Jackson abstaining from the Harvard case due to a conflict of interest. (Something Sotomayor might have considered in another case). Two of the three Liberal justices dissenting opinions were the usual claptrap of garbage we’ve come to expect from Kagan and Sotomayor. However, Brown Jackson’s dissent was right out of a CRT training guide, and Justice Thomas ripped it apart in his opinion. Here are some of the details from Fox News:

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas dismantled his colleague Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s “race-infused world view” as part of the Supreme Court’s decision Thursday to outlaw race considerations – also known as affirmative action – in the college admissions process.

Thomas, the second black justice to sit on the bench, sided with the 6-3 majority ruling Thursday saying the court’s decision “sees the universities’ admissions policies for what they are: rudderless, race-based preferences designed to ensure a particular racial mix in their entering classes.”

Which it is. It used to be that you wanted the best and the brightest going to these “Centers of higher Education.” What’s happened over the last 50 years is that the universities, correcting what were real issues regarding admissions, went to the other extremes. They decided that the best way to fix racism was to have more racism. This is what Brown Jackson wanted to continue with her dissent. Justice Thomas was having none of that.

Thomas said that “Justice Jackson’s race-infused world view falls flat at each step.”

“Individuals are the sum of their unique experiences, challenges, and accomplishments. What matters is not the barriers they face, but how they choose to confront them. And their race is not to blame for everything—good or bad—that happens in their live,” he said.

Ouch! That one had to sting, and it gets better.

Thomas wrote a concurring opinion “to offer an originalist defense of the colorblind Constitution” and to “clarify that all forms of discrimination based on race—including so-called affirmative action—are prohibited under the Constitution; and to emphasize the pernicious effects of all such discrimination.”

In doing so, Thomas slammed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent in which she called the ruling a “truly a tragedy for us all” with “ostrich-like” logic. 

Justice Thomas was just getting started with Brown Jackson.

“Though Justice Jackson seems to think that her race-based theory can somehow benefit everyone, it is an immutable fact that ‘every time the government uses racial criteria to ‘bring the races together,’ someone gets excluded, and the person excluded suffers an injury solely because of his or her race,'” Thomas wrote. 

“Justice Jackson seems to have no response—no explanation at all—for the people who will shoulder that burden. How, for example, would Justice Jackson explain the need for race-based preferences to the Chinese student who has worked hard his whole life, only to be denied college admission in part because of his skin color?” Thomas questioned.

The answer to that is simple. The Progressive Ruling Elites and their minions running the “Institutions of Higher Racism Learning” can ignore Asians. After all they’re just little yellow people who are only goof for mainlining gardens, doing laundry and running restaurants. (That’s actually how these racist drones think too)

“With the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, the people of our Nation proclaimed that the law may not sort citizens based on race. It is this principle that the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment adopted in the wake of the Civil War to fulfill the promise of equality under the law,” Thomas wrote. 

The Fox article, along with other sites on the InnerwebTubes, has the full text of Justice Thomas’s demolition of the recent Biden Diversity Hire that became a justice of the Supreme Court. It also shows that she should never have been confirmed, but we all knew that from the laugh/riot that was her confirmation hearings.

Brown Jackson is exactly the type of person we do not want on any court in the land. She will not uphold the Constitution, she will not uphold the law provided the law is within the framework of the constitution and she will not uphold the rights of the individual. In other words, she is the perfect Democrat.

We are fortunate to have Justice Clarence Thomas on the bench and his willingness to show America what we have to look forward to if the Democrats ever gain complete control of the three branches of government. Thank you Justice Thomas.

Thatisall

(2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

Loading...

~The Angry Webmaster~