Good day all. I stumbled across this story the other day and as of this post, it’s looking to be a single source. It seems that Laura Loomer has discovered that one of the Biden Judges who have been ruling against Making America Great Again might have a conflict of interest.
The judge in question is Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. I have a post on her recent actions blocking ICE from rounding up illegal aliens. Basically, she said that unless they have a warrant from a judge, they can’t arrest illegals. This is a load of manure of course and is being dealt with by the Trump Administration. (Mostly by ignoring her) However, it appears that Laura Loomer found something in Thurston’s background that should have caused her to recuse herself from the case. Here are some of the details from Revolver:
If you thought lawfare was just about courtroom theatrics and endless sham indictments, think again. The Left has turned activist judges into one of their deadliest weapons, all part of their coordinated, scorched-earth mission to stop President Trump from doing what he was elected to do: reverse Joe Biden’s radical, failed agenda and Make America Great Again.
First, a lot of this story is editorializing. However it does provide information with the commentary.
These aren’t impartial judges. They’re actually foot soldiers in robes who were hand-picked to carry out political hits from the bench.
And now, thanks to a bombshell exclusive from investigative bulldog Laura Loomer, we’re getting a firsthand look at just how corrupt and compromised some of these judges really are.
The information by Laura Loomer is from a twitter post. Sadly, Ms. Loomer has suffered some damage to her reputation. Because of this, she also tends to make sure all her ducks are in a row with varifiable facts. This appears to be one of those cases. Here is the actual report by Laura Loomer from her twitter feed.
The husband of California U.S. District Court Judge Jennifer L. Thurston, the judge who just ruled that President Trump’s administration can’t arrest any more illegal aliens unless they have a warrant for their arrest, is a multifamily real estate broker in California who caters to the illegal alien and immigrant community, and makes Instagram videos about how Donald Trump’s mass deportations and immigration policies are bad for multifamily real estate brokers and investors.
Judge Thurston was appointed by @JoeBiden in 2021.
This is a massive CONFLICT OF INTEREST that casts doubt on Judge Thurston’s April 29th, 2025 issuance of a preliminary injunction forbidding the US Border Patrol from conducting warrantless immigration stops throughout a wide swath of California. This injunction applies to Kern County, California, including Bakersfield, CA, where Judge Thurston’s husband is in business as a multi-family real estate broker.
Marc A. Thurston, Judge Thurston’s husband and Senior Vice President at ASU Commercial, specializes in Bakersfield’s multifamily real estate market. In video evidence exclusively obtained by
@LoomerUnleashed @CcpSkipTracer, Marc Thurston stated on his Instagram account in multiple videos he filmed this year since President Trump’s inauguration, that deportations of “undocumented immigrants” would harm the local rental market in Bakersfield, directly affecting his business, which relies on immigration enforcement outcomes since over 15,000 “undocumented workers” as he calls them, work in the Central Valley of California, and many of these illegals reside in multi-family housing where Marc Thurston and his wife Judge Jennifer Thurston live in California.
Judge Jennifer L. Thurston should have recused herself from the Trump admin case due to bias and personal financial gain resulting from her ruling, which benefits her husband’s business.
According to the “Federal Judiciary and Judicial Procedure” guidelines that all US Federal Judges are required to follow, a judge is required to recuse themselves from a case if they find themselves conflicted with any of the following rules below:
28 U.S.C. § 455(a): Requires recusal if a reasonable person, knowing all facts, might question the judge’s impartiality.
28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(4): Mandates recusal if the judge’s spouse has a financial interest that could be substantially affected by the case’s outcome.
Both of these apply to Judge Jennifer Thurston.
She is another example of Leftist, Biden-appointed activist judge.
Judge Thurston needs to RECUSE herself.
??EXCLUSIVE:??
The husband of California U.S. District Court Judge Jennifer L. Thurston, the judge who just ruled that President Trump’s administration can’t arrest any more illegal aliens unless they have a warrant for their arrest, is a multifamily real estate broker in… pic.twitter.com/yBly0fNFPN
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) May 1, 2025
Well, that’s what might be called an “Open and Shut” case of judicial misconduct. In a follow up report, Ms. Loomer said that Marc Thurston apparently deleted the videos from Instagram. Now as I mentioned above, this is all a single source story. There are no anonymous sources, which is a point in favor of the credibility of the story by Ms. Loomer.
What should now happen is that the Bondi DoJ should begin a very quiet review of Judge Thurston and this potential conflict of interest. If there is something to it, and it does appear that there is, then several things need to happen. First her decision needs to be tossed. (That should happen anyway, this will just speed things up a bit)
Second, a formal investigation of Judge Thurston needs to be undertaken. If, as it appears, there was misconduct by Judge Thurston, then the appropriate remedies must be taken. (Like impeaching her commie ass off the bench. These Obama and Biden judges have single handily wrecked centuries of credibility in the judicial system of the United States.
Because of the Democrats lawfare and their installing these people on the bench, many people have lost all faith that they will receive a fair and impartial hearing, whether it’s a civil case or a criminal case. It’s time to look into ways to remove these corrupt judges from the bench. The normal method has always been impeachment in the House and then conviction in the Senate. However, Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz. May have found another way. Here is what he has in mind from Just the News:
Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., filed a resolution that would remove U.S. District Judge James Boasberg for “failing to maintain the standard of good behavior required of judges” under Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution.
“Most Americans believe that there is lifetime tenure for a federal judge. That unless impeached, a federal judge can serve until death,” Biggs told Just the News. “But lifetime tenure is not guaranteed, nor mentioned, in the Constitution. Article III, Section 1 permits a federal judge to serve only ‘during good behavior.’”
Biggs argued the clause gives Congress the authority to remove judges that it believes have failed to uphold that standard short of using impeachment.
There is another tool where the Congress can simply close down the entire judicial branch, excluding the Supreme Court, and then rebuild it. This would, for all intents and purposes, remove all the judges from the bench and basically retiring them. This is also under Article II, Section 1.
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
The relevant section in this case is “Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” They can also close down the inferior courts.
This is basically nuking most of the judicial branch from orbit and not something that should be lightly considered. However, with the obvious corruption of primarily Democrat judges, this might need to be looked into. The alternative is a full blown constitutional crises, (We are at the beginning stages with these judges), where the President simply decides that if the orders cross the line constitutionally, then he will not obey or implement those decisions. I suspect that if all the information on Judge Thurston proves out, and she won’t take corrective action, then she needs to be made an example of.
Thatisall
(3 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...
~The Angry Webmaster~
