Good day all. A while back, arguments were heard before the Supreme Court regarding Birthright citizenship. The case revolves around one section of the 14th Amendment regarding a person being under the jurisdiction of the United States. The theory is that illegal aliens by being here illegally, aren’t under the jurisdiction of the United States and therefore their children aren’t citizens.
This post isn’t about the arguments for and against the theory. This is about the DEI hire, Ketanji Brown Jackson and who she thinks should be considered a citizen of the United States. Here are the details from Lifezette:
During oral arguments on Wednesday, April 1st, at the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson discussed the concept of “local allegiance” while considering whether children born in the United States to foreign nationals temporarily in the country should qualify for birthright citizenship, as reported by Breitbart.
Local allegiances? What in the Seven Hills of Rome is that?
During the proceedings, Jackson engaged in an exchange with Cecillia Wang, who argued that the executive order is unconstitutional. Jackson raised questions about how allegiance is defined under the law and whether it could apply to individuals present in the United States on a temporary basis.
“I was thinking about this, and I think there are various sources that say this, that you can have — you obviously have permanent allegiance based on being born in whatever country you’re from, that’s what everyone recognizes,” Jackson said.
Right off the bat, when you hear KBJ say “I was thinking” you know she’s about to say something unbelievably stupid. We weren’t disappointed.
“But you also have local allegiance when you are on the soil of this other sovereign.”
Jackson continued by offering a hypothetical example involving international travel.
Oh this should be entertaining, much in the same way a train coming off the rails is entertaining.
“And I was thinking, I, U.S. citizen, am visiting Japan, and what it means is that, if I steal someone’s wallet in Japan, the Japanese authorities can arrest me and prosecute me. It’s allegiance meaning, can they control you as a matter of law? I can also rely on them if my wallet is stolen, under Japanese law go and prosecute the person who has stolen it. So there’s this relationship, even though I’m a temporary traveler, I’m just on vacation in Japan, I’m still locally owing allegiance in that sense.”
No you stupid bitch, that isn’t the way it works. You are not under the jurisdiction of the Japanese government in so far that if you drop a baby, that kid becomes a citizen of Japan. What it does mean is that the Japanese Authorities will work with you, a victim of a crime, to get your property back and prosecute the criminal who stole it.
The remarks came as the court considers how the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to children born on U.S. soil to parents who are not permanent residents or citizens.
I can just hear the other justices groaning internally over the DEI hire’s comments.
While the concept of birthright citizenship has been recognized in prior rulings, the court has not explicitly addressed whether it applies to children born to illegal aliens or foreign tourists in the United States. Estimates cited during the broader public debate suggest that approximately 250,000 children are born each year in the United States to illegal aliens and foreign tourists.
Another issue is something called Birthright tourism. This is when a woman travels to the United States on a tourist visa who is very close to her due date. The idea is that she has her baby, gets the American birth certificate and citizenship for her baby and then returns to her own country. There are a number of major security questions with this, one being that someone who was born here 40 years previously, but hasn’t spent a day in the country, could run for and become president of the United States.
We’re already experiencing problems with naturalized citizens running for congress and assorted state governments who really don’t have any connection with the United States, and are pushing laws that reflect their own countries and not America. On the flip side, we have a number who work their butts off to become Americans and actively support the Constitution, especially the 2nd Amendment.
While I hope that the Supreme Court will rule in favor of the United States, both our citizens, those who became citizens and accept America wholeheartedly, and those who are lawfully here, I’m not going to hold my breath. I’ve always thought that fixing this issue will require a constitutional amendment. It’s long time past that we stop rewarding criminals who enter illegally, drop an anchor baby and then claim their spawn is a citizen.
As for the Biden DEI Hire, Ketanji Brown Jackson, she really needs to be removed from the bench. She is stupefyingly unqualified to be a justice on the highest court in the land. She needs to be removed from the bench, either pressured to resign, or, if it could be pulled off, impeached in the House and convicted in the Senate. Sadly, I don’t see that happening. That blockhead is on the court because she is a moron and can be counted on to back whatever the Democrats tell her to.
Thatisall
(1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...
~The Angry Webmaster~
