Next Mass. Governor a Republican?

Good day all. I’m sick with of all the Ebola news and started looking for something else. What should appear on my radar is the governors race in Massachusetts to replace outgoing governor Deval “Steve Urkle” Patrick.

Currently the race is between Democrat Martha Coakley, the current Attorney General of Massachusetts and the Republican sacrificial lamb candidate Charles Baker. Now I, along with everyone else, expected Coakley to win in a landslide. This is the People’s Democratic Republic of Taxachusetts after all, home to the Kremlin on the Charles ((Cambridge, Massachusetts)). However, it looks like there is a possibility of Coakley once again snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Here are a few interesting details from Fox News:

Massachusetts gubernatorial candidate Martha Coakley is a veteran of state politics, but perhaps is best known nationally as the Democrat who lost the late Sen. Ted Kennedy’s seat to Republican Scott Brown in the 2010 special election.

And a shocking development that was! Scott Brown was elected in a special election to fill the seat of noted drunkard and vehicular homicidal maniac Edward Moore “Fatboy” Kennedy. The Massachusetts Moonbats corrected that error by electing Elizabeth “Fauxahantas” Warren and sending Brown to run for Senator run New Hampshire.

This year, the race for governor is Coakley’s chance for political redemption. But even in the predominantly Democratic Bay State, she’s struggling once again. The latest poll numbers show the Commonwealth’s first female attorney general, who had maintained a healthy lead in the race over the summer, now in a dead heat with Republican Charlie Baker. Plus, Coakley is trailing considerably in fundraising

But, this can’t be right. Everyone knows that Massachusetts is a single party socialist state and that Martha Coakley has been anointed by the Supreme Soviet State Democrat Party to be the next General Secretary Governor of the Union of Soviet Socialist Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This is making the Democrats very nervous.

The tight race has Democrats working to avoid a repeat of the 2010 upset, scrambling to rally the base — and it drew first lady Michelle Obama to the state last Friday, where she urged a grassroots effort to make calls and knock on doors.

“We have an opportunity to build an economy that works for everybody,” Coakley said at the rally, sounding a populist tone. “Not just people at the top, not just Wall Street.”

Gee, where have we heard this before? I know! We hear this same crap from Barack Obola. Of course, what Coakley and the Progressive Liberal Fascist Democrats aren’t mentioning is just how well all those “Wall Streeters and People at the Top” are doing under her hero, Barack Obola. The people getting screwed are the people the PLFD’s and Coakley claim to support. Now a little bit about Charlie Baker, Coakley’s opponent.

Baker, who also was the GOP nominee for governor in 2010 and lost to Democratic Gov. Deval Patrick, is a businessman who served in the cabinets of two prior governors and spent 10 years as the head of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care.

So, unlike Coakley, he’s actually run a real business and signed paychecks. Coakley’s never signed a paycheck in her life. Just donor checks she’s deposited to her accounts. Baker was expected to go down to a crushing defeat, but as we are seeing, a funny thing happened on the way to November. The polls, which had Baker some 15 points behind Coakley, have tightened up rather significantly.

“We have a little over a month to go and we’ve closed a 15-point gap over the course of the past four or five months,” Baker said. “We’re focusing on our plans to bring back balance and fiscal discipline to Beacon Hill, create jobs and build a great Massachusetts and we’ve been thrilled with the reaction we’ve gotten from voters across the political spectrum.”

This is a pretty big swing, going from 15 points behind to a virtual dead heat. Charlie Baker has an idea why this is happening.

“My view is that the people of Massachusetts are very pragmatic,” Baker added. “What they want more than anything is somebody that’s going to get the job done, somebody that’s going to focus on controlling the spending and reducing taxes and reforming government.”

And this is the same state that elected Obola twice, then booted Scott Brown for Fauxahantas Warren and then put in Edward “Ice Cream Man” Markey ((Eddie the Ice Cream Man)) to replace John “Liveshot” Kerry when he became Secretary of State? Of course, there are two reasons why the sudden shift in the polls. The first is people are now paying attention to the election and the other is money. Baker has it and Coakley doesn’t.

Perhaps the most stunning aspect of the race is the wide money gap. Baker’s team has more than $1.5 million cash on hand, compared with the Coakley camp’s $266,000.

Now how the heck did that happen? Where are all the disgustingly rich hypocritical Liberals? Probably busy working on their buddies in the Obola Regime to further loot the Treasury for phony baloney green energy proposals. They might not have any free cash on hand, and don’t feel like tapping their trust funds due to the markets being down at the moment.

All kidding aside, I will be rather surprised of Coakley loses again. It will show her to be the incompetent moonbat anyone who’s followed her knows she is. If she were to win, and considering the makeup of the Massachusetts legislature, the State economy would probably collapse. She is as clueless about the real world as any barking moonbat I’ve ever seen. Well, November is just around the corner.

Thatisall

~The Angry Webmaster~