Good day all. On the Sunday talking heads shows, Senator Lindsey Graham, (RINO-SC), one of the two biggest walking diaper stains in the Republican Senate, called for 6000 American troops to go into Syria.
For what purpose, other then to screw up the middle east even worse than it is, I’m not sure. Here are the details from Fox News:
Sen. Lindsey Graham on Sunday took perhaps the most aggressive Washington stance on the country’s simultaneous effort to defeat ISIS and solve the Syrian crisis — calling for more U.S. troops in the terror fight and suggesting President Trump already has broad authority to order missile strikes on Syria.
The South Carolina Republican and military hawk is calling for as many as 6,000 more U.S. troops to help defeat the Islamic State terror group in the Middle East.
“You need more American troops to accelerate (ISIS’) demise,” Graham told NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “You train the opposition to go after [Syrian President Bashar] Assad. That’s how he’s taken out by his own people, with our efforts.
I have an answer for you scumbag. How about…NO! It’s one thing to blast that crap out of an air base used to launch chemical attacks against civilians, it’s quite another to send in ground forces. The first sent a clear message to Assad and others around the world who were used to President Stumblebum making grandiose statements and then sitting around with his thumb up his butt. The second, sending in troops, with no clear plan of action, no real, understood goals and no idea of how to win is what got us into trouble into Iraq.
Graham also argued Sunday that the United States is “relying too much” on the Kurds in that region to defeat ISIS and that additional U.S. troops would attract more regional fighters in that effort.
Yeah, and how has that worked out for us in the past numbnuts? Let me give you a hint. It hasn’t worked out at all. There is no strategic reason to send in ground forces at this time. We might need to in the future, but not now. We’ve had to live with the incompetence and stupidity of the Neocons such as yourself for almost 20 years. Today, we have someone in the White House who is used to setting goals and then figuring out how to achieve them. I don’t think he sees a reason to risk American lives on yet another stupid Neocon, Globalist conflict.
Now why don’t you go attend the opening of a new fabric store somewhere? I know that’s what gets you really excited in the morning. Leave governing the nation to people who intend to put America first and your precious “New World Order” on to the ash heap of history, right along with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
Thatisall
~The Angry Webmaster~
[yasr_visitor_votes size=”large”]
The Kurds don’t need US troops getting in their way. They just need a reliable source of arms and ammunition.
“…what got us into trouble into Iraq.” And Afghanistan, and Vietnam. Wars aren’t fought successfully from DC. Leave it to the generals that understand so much better than the pols. Give our military a mission and they’ll succeed. Try to micromanage it from inside the I-495 beltway (btw I hate to drive in and around DC) and it gets screwed up. EVERY. FREAKING. TIME.
Military mission in one easy lesson: Have enough force to deter anyone from attacking us (and our interests, which might need to be redefined and reeled in from straying waaaay beyond the Monroe Doctrine), AND the cojones to use it when necessary. Some fool decides to attack anyway, then we send our might to kill people and break their things until they learn their lesson to never do that again. Done. Wash, Rinse, repeat.