Good day all. The attempt by the Progressive Democrats to “get” President Trump has actually taken a turn for the worse…For the Democrats. One of the things that has come out in the Democrats attempts to “Get Trump” was the news that American citizens were “Unmasked” in classified reports.
To refresh your memories, when the NSA or other intelligence services are lawfully spying on foreign nationals, occasionally they pick up communications from an American citizen. Since this was done without a warrant, the comments on who that person or persons is, is blacked out. This is to protect them from unlawful surveillance and the obvious violations of their constitutional rights. There is a very careful procedure when there is a need to “Unmask” the American citizen.
This is where the problems for the Democrats arose. The Obama Regime, notorious for ignoring the rule of law, apparently started spying on the Trump transition team. The then National Security Adviser, and well known liar, Susan Rice, decided to release the “Unmasked” documents and pass them to pretty much everyone. Now she is being looked at by Congress and could be in serious legal jeopardy. Her response to all this? Blame it all on racism and sexism. Here are the details from Fox News:
Susan Rice, the Obama national security adviser under fire over her alleged involvement in the “unmasking” of Trump associates during the 2016 presidential election, suggested in a fresh interview that race and gender might be playing a role in the scrutiny she’s faced.
In an interview with journalist Michael Tomasky for New York Magazine, Rice reportedly questioned the criticism she’s faced dating back to the Benghazi controversy.
“Why me? Why not Jay Carney, for example, who was then our press secretary, who stood up more?” she asked.
Well, how about this? Carney didn’t have access to those documents and you did. Furthermore, when the spying on Donald Trump’s transition team took place, Carney wasn’t even working for the regime any longer.
Tomasky noted in the piece that Carney “isn’t an African-American woman, of course” and apparently asked Rice whether that is the key factor. Rice, in response, left the door open:
“I don’t know… I do not leap to the simple explanation that it’s only about race and gender. I’m trying to keep my theories to myself until I’m ready to come out with them. It’s not because I don’t have any.”
Allow me to answer you. It has nothing to do with your skin tone or your gender. It has everything to do with you being a liar.
But Rice mentioned other prominent female figures – like Hillary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice – who faced “ad hominem” attacks, suggesting a correlation.
Comparing Condoleezza Rice to Hillary Clinton is like comparing Pol Pot to Mother Theresa. Oh, just so you know, I do not equate Hillary Clinton, aka Felonia von Pantsuit, with Mother Theresa.
Asked about the comments, a Republican Capitol Hill source pushed back. “This is screaming out for attention… She’s saying I don’t know why they all started picking on me to begin with.”
Perhaps she truly doesn’t. She isn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer after all. I have a feeling she couldn’t spell Ethics on a bet.
As to the suggestion of race and gender being a factor, the source countered, then “why would there be a subpoena for a white male?”
To provide some cover for the racist, sexist attack on on Susan Rice? You know that will be the response from the Progressive Liberal Democrats.
That was a reference to the fact that Rice is not the only focus of the congressional probe into unmasking. Investigators have issued subpoenas to three different agencies: NSA, CIA and FBI.
Those subpoenas have asked for unmasking information related to three individuals: former CIA Director John Brennan, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, and Rice.
And the information coming out is that Brennan is into this up to his eyeballs. I’m rather surprised that Samantha Powers is included. As I understand it, she shouldn’t have access to any part of these files in the first place, masked or unmasked. Well, that’s what the investigation is for. Getting the goods on the Communist, (Brennan), the anti-Semite, (Powers), and the liar. (Rice)
She’s not the only focus of congressional frustration, either. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., had a tense exchange with a top intelligence community lawyer at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday where he complained he still doesn’t have an answer on whether his communications have been monitored.
“Am I ever gonna get [the response] in my lifetime?” he asked.
Oh I wouldn’t doubt he was monitored, but for what purpose? His discussions revolve around screwing over the Tea Party and where the best fabric stores are in Washington D.C.
Rice told Judy Woodruff on PBS on March 22 that she “knew nothing” about the unmasking of Trump associates.
But weeks later on MSNBC, she admitted she sometimes sought out the identities of Trump associates who communicated with foreigners, a request known as “unmasking” in the intelligence community.
But “I leaked nothing to nobody,” Rice told MSNBC.
I do believe that Al Capone may have used a version of that phrase during a Grand Jury hearing. It didn’t work out to well for him either. Susan Rice is in big trouble and she knows it. Obama shipped all the documents on the unmasking to his “Library” to keep them out of the hands of organizations such as Judicial Watch.
However, those documents will have to be give to Congress, the courts, federal investigators or the White House if they are subpoenaed, or in the case of the White House, if President Trump orders their return. I’m of the opinion that they should be seized as soon as possible. The Democrats have a long history of destroying incriminating documents and I’m concerned that these records could end up “accidentally shredded” or something.
Thatisall
~The Angry Webmaster~
[yasr_visitor_votes size=”large”]
