Good day all. Since the return of President Trump to office, all sorts of interesting information on the flat out corruption of the Deep State has been coming out. FBI Director Patel has been releasing documents to Congress that the Oversight committees have been looking for going back years.
Now a new report has come out that literally asks, “What did the FBI know and when did the know it?” The agency started preparing for a contested election in 2020 before the election was even held. Here are the details from Just the News:
The FBI conducted a tabletop exercise in summer 2020 that imagined what sort of violence might ensue in a contested presidential election that year, devising strategies like undercover informants and mass prosecutions for minor crimes that it would later use with the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, documents obtained by Just the News show.
This begs the question, why? Why were they gaming out a contested election? I doubt that President Trump or his trusted advisors were aware of this. I suspect this was cooked up by Christopher Wray and possibly the Deep State operative, Bob Barr.
FBI Director Kash Patel turned over the long-secret memos to Congress last week, providing fresh evidence that federal law enforcement was acutely concerned for months ahead of time about the potential for violence in the aftermath of the 2020 election.
The memos show the bureau’s Boston office led the tabletop exercise and culled open-source intelligence on the potential for violence from both left-leaning anarchists to right-leaning extremists.
This was the Boston office, not the Washington main office? Why would they do something like this? It wasn’t like President Trump ever expected to win in the People’s Democratic Republic of Taxachusetts. I have a suspicion that there is something much more nefarious going on.
“The FBI assesses domestic violent extremist (DVE) threats related to the 2020 elections likely will increase as the election approaches, despite the current focus of many DVEs on the COVID-19 pandemic and civil unrest,” an August 2020 memo concluded.
At the time of this exercise, the election hadn’t been held and no one thought that Covid-19 was anything more than a simple flu and people were overreacting to it. (Instead of the Fauci paid for genetically engineered bioweapon) Now if they were thinking that it would be the Left going violent after what was assumed to be President Trump’s expect win, that I could understand.
The memos also warned that foreign enemies like Iran and China were likely to foment domestic violence on U.S. soil.
I can see Iran trying something, but China? Not to likely. I think the risks would outweigh any alleged benefits for them. You can read the memos here. Loudermilk Letter October 30 2025 Production Final 1_Redacted.pdf
Rep. Barry Loudermilk said the memos show the FBI had far more concerns about a disputed election and violence than it acknowledged during the Biden years and yet failed to adequately alert the U.S. Capitol ahead of the Jan. 6, 2021 tragedy.
“This document is evidence that Wray’s FBI predicted, as early as September 2020, that an attack on the Capitol was possible,” he said. “It also suggests that the FBI infiltrate online chat forums and build a network of Confidential Human Sources (CHS) prior to January 6. It further outlines how the FBI should pursue heavy-handed prosecutions for minor offenses, which Biden’s DOJ carried out quite effectively after the attack.”
What the Garland DoJ and Wray FBI did to the January 6th protesters was nothing less then something right out of any dictatorship. They were locking people up for years without trial and denying them their rights for simply walking into the Capital building and looking around. Even when they were given a trial, the charges were way over the top. This was one of the reasons that President Trump pardoned almost all of the J6 protesters.
“We now know, through CHS reports and other intelligence, that the FBI had enough information to not only predict an attack on the Capitol, but to prepare for one,” he added. “So why did the FBI not take steps to protect the U.S. Capitol?”
That was all part of the plan. President Trump suspected that there may be issues and tried to get San Fran Nan Pelosi, the then Speaker of the House, to put in a formal request for National Guard and other reinforcements, but she refused to do so. Why? She wanted something to happen so she could use it against President Trump, the Republicans and anyone who supported President Trump.
The memo shared a threat assessment exercise conducted by the FBI’s Boston Field Office about the possible threats such violent extremists may play in the case of a disputed election, warning that the growing prevalence of threats towards elected officials in particular, made that outcome more likely.
Excuse me? This was done in the Boston Field Office? The one that was at one point, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Boston Irish Mob? (James “Whitey” Bulger, CEO) Granted, they’ve cleaned that all out, mostly, but why were they running this sort of an exercise? Shouldn’t this have been done by the Washington Headquarters?
Of particular concern to the Boston office was the possibility that a contentious election dispute may prime certain violent groups to prepare for future violence, which could be set off by “the next major social upheaval or event.”
Well, we know that the Left will go violent at the drop of a misgendered pronoun, but the Right generally doesn’t go that route unless really pushed.
To combat this, the FBI office recommended developing a “robust source base” that would be “embedded” with possibly violent groups in order to provide “early detection and disruption of planning for future events.”
The office also envisioned a strong law enforcement response to even “minimal criminal activity” as a way to deter any group’s plans for future violent action.
These tactics were employed six months later during and in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.
And the abuse by the FBI and the DoJ of people who, in some cases, just happened to be standing in the wrong area along with the flat out witch hunts of people who were nowhere near the Capital Building, was pushing people to seriously consider going after FBI agents and DoJ prosecutors.
Unlike the usual Leftist retards, if people on the Right had decided “That’s IT!”, then the FBI would have been hit so hard that their heads would have been left spinning…Probably on the ground. Fortunately, this didn’t happen and hopefully this will not happen.
After repeatedly refusing to elaborate to Congress how many FBI informants were present in the crowd that day, after-action complaints from FBI agents showed about two dozen informants were embedded in the crowd and that more than 250 agents were deployed to deal with the crowds, Just the News previously reported.
And the next question was how many of these agents were actually “Agents Provocateurs?” Instead of trying to tamp things down, they either stood back or actively pushed things along.
The thousands of Jan. 6-related prosecutions pursued by the federal government in the aftermath of the riot, with some offenses only amounting to misdemeanor trespassing, were later used by the FBI to inflate the Domestic Violent Extremism threat metrics, used to justify a sweeping expansion of federal law enforcement–later catching up traditional Catholics and parents speaking at school board meetings.
And you can see why that by the time of the 2024 election, a good 50 percent of the American people were saying that the time had come to formally disband the FBI and dismiss most of the personnel. They were targeting anyone who opposed the Deep State, The Democrats and the Biden Maladministration.
The Biden White House released its “National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism” in June 2021, echoing the conclusions of the earlier August 2020 report, but with the Jan. 6 riot in hindsight.
The corrected title was more like “Democrat Strategy for Countering Donald Trump and his supporters by weaponizing the Justice system.”
“The Intelligence Community (IC) assesses that domestic violent extremists (DVEs) who are motivated by a range of ideologies and galvanized by recent political and societal events in the United States pose an elevated threat to the Homeland in 2021,” the Biden-era domestic terrorism document argued, citing the Capitol riot as an example.
The Biden Maladministration didn’t consider groups such as Antifa to be a domestic terrorist group. They did consider people who demanded answers from School Boards on what they were teaching their children to be domestic terrorists. They also considered anyone who opposed the Biden Maladministration’s responses to Covid-19 to be terrorists as well.
The document never disclosed, however, the key difference between the Capitol riot and other domestic terrorist attacks.
And what were those key differences?
Unlike the perpetrators in the previous deadly domestic terrorist attacks, the January 6 rioters did not kill a single person, Just the News previously reported.
That was one of many little issues regarding the January 6th protest that certain parties continue to ignore. None of the protesters was armed. The only ones killed were murdered by police (Ashli Babbitt) The other little detail they ignore was that if the protesters were going to do something really insurrection like, they would have been armed to the teeth and they would have succeeded.
Since the return of President Trump, documents like this, which Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray deliberately hid from both Congress and the American People, have been located and handed over to the oversight committees. What we have been seeing should force Congress to consider some legislation to seriously restrict and overhaul the FBI. I don’t think a formal disbandment should be off the table either.
Thatisall
(2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...
~The Angry Webmaster~
