Obama v Supreme Court

Good day all. Last week the United States Supreme Court spent three days listing to arguments about the constitutionality of Obamacare.

The questions from most of the justices were very tough for the Solicitor General and he didn’t handle himself very well. The probable reason is that he knows this law is blatantly unconstitutional, and while he is required to defend it, ethically, he is an officer of the court and can’t lie about it.

As I said, the questioning was very tough and thoughtful in most cases. Justices Kagan and Ginsburg-Bader showed their usual contempt for the constitution. In fact, Justice Kagan should have recused herself due to her prior work in ramming this POS through in the first place.

In any case, the questioning has lead most of Obamacare’s supporters to think that at the very least the mandate will be tossed out, (Which guts the law for all intents and purposes), and may throw the whole mess down the crapper due to a lack of a severability clause. This has caused the left to go into a blind panic.

They are looking to blame anyone for this thing being declared unconstitutional. The Solicitor General’s poor performance is popular and now they are starting their accusations that the conservative justices are going to legislate from the bench. It is inconceivable to them that their pride and joy, the virtual enslavement of the American People to the federal government, is going to be thrown out. It hasn’t occurred to them that this piece of drek was bad from the get go.

For to long, since at least the Roosevelt administration, the courts have generally deferred to the Congress when it came to taking power and rights away from the states and the people. Now it looks like the court is finally beginning to understand that things have gone to far and that Obamacare was nothing more than an absolute power grab.

Obama has never liked the constitutions limits on his power and he has been generally ignoring those limits, safe in the knowledge that the Democrats would generally back him and the spineless cowards in the Republican party would do nothing to stop him. Now Obama is taking on the court. There are rumors that the decision was leaked and he knows that he has lost. Now he is accusing the USSC ((The Supreme Court of the United States)) of indulging in “Judicial Activism.”

Here’s the scoop from Reuters:

President Barack Obama took an opening shot at conservative justices on the Supreme Court on Monday, warning that a rejection of his sweeping healthcare law would be an act of “judicial activism” that Republicans say they abhor.

For Democrats, as long as the courts rule their way, it’s “Upholding the constitution. If they rule against them, even when it’s obviously an unconstitutional law, it’s activism. Of course, Liberal Progressive Democrats are masters of projecting what they are doing on others, such as Bush was going to ignore the constitution when Obama HAS been doing just that. Or that Bush was taking us into illegal wars as Obama did in Libya. ((Leon Panetta tells congress Obama can start wars without them)) Now the shoe is on the other foot and the Democrats don’t like it one bit.

“Ultimately, I am confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress,” Obama said at a news conference with the leaders of Canada and Mexico.

The one thing missing from that statement, but no doubt implied was “Or Else.”

“And I’d just remind conservative commentators that, for years, what we have heard is, the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism, or a lack of judicial restraint, that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law,” Obama said.

Of course, the problem is the law wasn’t “Duly constituted.” It was jammed down the throats of the American people against their wishes. Now we’re beginning to see just how bad this thing is. The first steps, the suppression of the Catholic Church, (As well as other religions that are pro-life), have begun.

Obama’s advisers say they have not prepared contingency plans if the measure fails. But the president — who expressed confidence that the court would uphold the law — made clear how he would address it on the campaign trail if the court strikes it down.

My guess is, he will do what he always does. Ignore the court or the Congress. After all, he is “The One.” He is “The Light Bringer.” “How dare these little people stand in the way of My greatness?”

Yeah, Obama has the same sort of megalomania as Hugo Chavez, Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin and other tyrants throughout history.

The Supreme Court justices are expected to issue decisions in the dispute by late June, a time when the presidential campaign season is likely to be in full swing.

This was exactly the one thing Obama and the Democrats did NOT want to have happen. If the court strikes down Obamacare, then people will have confirmation that Obama’s signature legislation, (That he really didn’t do much to get passed), was unconstitutional. If the court upholds it, it will enrage an already angry electorate, probably causing an even bigger blowout of Democrats than in 2010.

I suspect that if it was upheld, one of the first things to start happening would be a full blown effort for the states to call a Constitutional Convention to strip power away from Congress and the President. Failing that, the probability of an outright civil war increases by several orders of magnitude.

Do you need a reason to vote in November? Here it is. We need to clean out the rot on both sides of the aisle.

Remember in November!

Thatisall

~The Angry Webmaster~

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 1.00 out of 5)
Loading...

 

obama attempts to bully Supreme Court over obamacare ruling …

obama attempts to bully Supreme Court over obamacare ruling. April 2, 2012 evilofindifference Leave a comment Go to comments. Combative Obama warns Supreme Court on health law. “US President Barack Obama on Monday challenged …
http://evilofindifference.wordpress.com/ — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:19:21 -0700
If there’s anything novel about the ObamaCare case, it’s the idea of federal power to compel purchases, not the Court’s reaction to it. And what on earth does this mean? “Ultimately I am confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would …
http://www.welbornfreedomwatch.org/ — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:10:00 -0700

Healthcare Reform (aka “Obamacare”) Goes to the Supreme Court …

The U.S. Supreme Court heard three days of highly anticipated oral arguments pertaining to the Affordable Care Act (March 26 – 28, 2012). What is at issue? Challenging the ACA are 26 states that filed suits in the lower courts, as well as the …
http://orlandoinsurancestore.com/ — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:58:51 -0700
The insurance mandate clearly exceeds the federal government’s powers under the interstate commerce clause found in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. This is patently obvious: the power to “regulate” commerce cannot include the …
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/ — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:05:09 -0700

Obama Attacks Supreme Court…Calls The Possible Overturning Of …

Obama is attacking the Supreme Court again. Last time he accused them of “reversing a century of law” which would lead to special interests, including foreign companies, to spend without limit during our elections. You may remember this …
http://floppingaces.net/ — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:03:23 -0700

Obama’s Lies And Hypocrisy In Demanding Supreme Court Uphold …

Obama has in essence preemptively declared the Supreme Court to be an “unelected group of people” who will be guilty of “judicial activism” if they overturn either the individual mandate in Obamacare or the law in totality. He said to do so …
http://www.theconservativereview.com/ — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:01:48 -0700

Obama Gets His Mussolin On: Warns U.S. Supreme Court on …

by John Galt April 2, 2012 17:55 ET A video which speaks for itself. It is stunning because this is the kind of action that old Mussolini would take in Fascist Italy or FDR in Fascist America. (h/t TownHall Magazine)
http://johngaltfla.com/wordpress/ — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:50:01 -0700
B.S. Report–The President’s planting a seed for both the public and the Court…they wouldn’t dare overturn a law passed legitimately by elected members of Congress. Excuse me, it’s up to the Court to decide the law’s constitutionality, not …
http://thebsreport.wordpress.com/ — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:37:32 -0700
Share my Musings on Social Media

About Angry Webmaster

I am the Angry Webmaster! Fear Me!
This entry was posted in liberty, News of the Day and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Obama v Supreme Court

  1. Obama v Supreme Court – #angercentralarchives http://t.co/VkmY87Driy

    0
    0
  2. Obama v Supreme Court – #angercentralarchives http://t.co/nFesbPkm

    0
    0
  3. Madoc Pope says:

    Actually, I think goading the Supremes into overturning Obamacare would be the best outcome Obama can hope for.  If the Supremes keep it more or less intact then it will be a wonderful rallying point for Republicans come November.  If the Supremes strike it down, then Team Obama can rail about “activist judges” and whine about “how we was robbed – just like in 2000!”  It also would be a lot better for the Democrats, politically, if they can avoid the Republicans “winning” on this issue.  That is, seeing the Republicans disassemble Obamacare on their own and thus take the credit for doing so.

    If the Supremes strike it down, then the Republicans can not claim direct victory for it – after all, it’d just be the Court upholding the Constitution and that can hardly be a _Republican_ thing, right? 

    So, Obama may well be trying to piss off the Supremes and force their hand.  Given his radical activist… err… his, uh… his “community organizer” background as a Saul Alinsky acolyte,  I wouldn’t be at all surprised we he that crafty.

    0
    0
  4. Pingback: nedb

  5. Pingback: angrywebmaster

Leave a Reply