Good day all. Once again, the Biden DEI appointment to the Supreme Court, Ketanji Brown Jackson, has demonstrated that she is not fit to be a justice in the highest court in the land.
Recently, there was a case decided 8-1 in favor of the plaintiff Kaley Chiles. The case revolved around Ms. Chiles, who is a clinical psychologist and was being told that she would not be allowed to treat minors who were having issues with their biology. (They were having issues with being a girl or a boy) Colorado, being ruled by the party of perverts, aka the Democrats, banned treating minors who were having issues.
One thing led to another, there was a court challenge and it ended up in the Supreme Court. The court ruled in favor of Ms. Chiles under the 1st Amendment right of free speech. The one dissenter was the DEI hire, associate justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Her dissent showed that she is no fan of freedom of speech if she disagrees with it. Here is a commentary by Jonathan Turley on Fox News:
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is again warning of a growing threat to the nation. In her lone dissent Tuesday in Chiles v. Salazar, Jackson observed that “to be completely frank, no one knows what will happen now.”
Actually everyone who has any functioning brain cells knows you moron.
The ominous tone stemmed from the fact that free speech had prevailed over state-imposed orthodoxy in a Colorado case. Eight justices, including her two liberal colleagues, ruled that Colorado could not prevent licensed counselors from “any practice or treatment” that “attempts or purports to change” a minor’s sexual orientation or gender identity.
I can understand why the Democrats in Colorado tried to do this. Those Libtarded perverts get off hurting and grooming children for their perverted pleasure. How dare parents seek to help their children get their heads squared away and deny the Democrats what they consider to be their due?
The win for free speech was catastrophic for Jackson and many on the left. Allowing counselors to discuss the causes and basis for sexual orientation changes, Jackson maintained, would “open a can of worms.” It would be far better for the majority to simply silence such dissenting voices in the name of science.
I don’t know if that last bit, the part about it being better to suppress speech, was something at moron said or if it was added by Jonathon Turley. Considering just how stupid KBJ is, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if she actually said that.
The dissent in Chiles is only the latest example of the chilling jurisprudence of Justice Jackson, including a pronounced dismissal of free speech values. Consider the holding of her colleagues that Jackson finds so horrific.
Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote that the First Amendment “reflects … a judgment that every American possesses an inalienable right to think and speak freely, and a faith in the free marketplace of ideas as the best means for discovering truth … any law that suppresses speech based on viewpoint represents an ‘egregious’ assault on both of those commitments.”
I, personally, don’t see the problem with accepting the spoken words by a therapist to his or her patient as both free speech and medical treatment. The problem is that people like KBJ have a problem with both free speech and actually treating an obvious mental health problem that goes against the Progressive Liberal Democrat’s orthodoxy of mutilating and sexualizing children. Basically, KBJ wanted to treat the therapies as conduct, not speech. KBJ’s stupidity was so deep, even the other libtards were fed up with her.
Justice Elena Kagan could not withhold her frustration with her colleague, noting that “[b]ecause the State has suppressed one side of a debate, while aiding the other, the constitutional issue is straightforward.” She added that Jackson’s view “rests on reimagining — and in that way collapsing — the well-settled distinction between viewpoint-based and other content-based speech restrictions.”
Of the three Libtard Karens on the Supreme Court, Kagen is generally considered the most intelligent. Sotomayor is almost as dumb as Brown Jackson, but even she can see the problems with KBJ’s opinion.
For years, pundits portrayed those who questioned gender reassignment surgeries and treatments as bigots. Now, leading medical associations and European nations have decided that such procedures should not be generally allowed.
When they talk about these surgeries, they are referring primarily those who are mutilating children, not legal adults. Bluntly, once you are an adult, you can make all the stupid decisions you want. Just understand that you have no one to blame but yourself.
Yet, Justice Jackson sees the protection of dissenting scientific and professional views as a “can of worms” that the courts should avoid in favor of state and associational imposed truths. She wrote that allowing such opposing views “ultimately risks grave harm to Americans’ health and wellbeing.”
Funny, I didn’t think she had a medical degree to go along with her law degree. Of course, she’s not even considering, if the thought actually made an appearance in her empty head, that Therapists can and are sued for malpractice.
Keep in mind that counselors can still be sued for any harm that they cause due to malpractice or negligence. Indeed, recently in New York, a jury awarded $2 million to Fox Varian, 22, over the double mastectomy performed on her while she was a minor.
One of the issues we’re now trying to deal with is both so called mental health professionals who don’t seem to be putting their patients ahead of their own personal beliefs, and surgeons who are carrying out these procedures on healthy adolescents. Unless there is an actual medical reason to do so, these doctors should flat out refuse to perform these procedures on minors. If parents push it, then we might need to review their actions as parents, but that’s something for another day.
State associations can also publish positions on such therapy and seek to convince both professionals and the public on the best practices for children.
While I might disagree, probably violently disagree, these incompetent slugs do have the right to publish under the 1st Amendment, and I have the right to tell them they are full of it. I have little doubt that KBJ, judicial numskull that she is, has no problem with this since they would be publishing things she agrees with. I also don’t doubt she would come after me for disagreeing with that point of view.
None of that was sufficient for Justice Jackson or for the state of Colorado.
The Democratic legislators have made the state arguably the most hostile to free speech in the nation.
The Democrat Party is no no different from any of the major totalitarian parties of the 20th century. Communist, Fascists, Nazis, Democrats. Today they are all cut from the same cloth and we’re reaching the point where they will need to be dealt with in the same way they were in the 20th century.
Colorado has become essentially a Constitution free zone in the United States. It was Colorado through it’s supreme court that tried to ban President Trump from the ballot in 2024.
It was Colorado that sought to force bakers, photographers, and web designers to produce work in favor of same-sex marriages despite their religious objections. Each effort was supported by the Tenth Circuit and each failed in spectacular fashion before the Supreme Court.
We have a serious problem with the Judicial branch in this country, both on a state and federal level. The Democrats, knowing that most of the country disagrees with what they want, intends to use the courts to impose their will on the American people no matter what the people want. In order to accomplish this, they need to get people on the bench who have the same contempt for the Constitution that the Democrat Elites do
What is most chilling is that Jackson is now routinely called the model for new nominees, including the push to pack the Supreme Court with an instant liberal majority.
If so, Jackson’s radical views on constitutional interpretation could be replicated on a newly packed Supreme Court. To paraphrase the Chiles decision, “to be completely frank, we know exactly what will happen then.”
Yes, we do. It will lead to the second American civil war. You will see easily half the states break away. The Democrats, being the racist totalitarians they are, will trying and pull a Lincoln and use force to impose their will. The Democrats will lose, again or they might just try and use nuclear weapons inside the United States. They are that stupid.
However, that is all supposition and something for another day. What I do think may happen is that Ketanji Brown Jackson will either be forced to resign or, if circumstances line up correctly, be the first Supreme Court Justice to be impeached in the House and convicted in the Senate and removed from the bench. She definitely needs to go. She should never have been confirmed in the first place. At least she is showing America what the future holds of the Democrats get their way.
Thatisall
(2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...
~The Angry Webmaster~
