Good day all. Last month, in a surprise election upset, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez defeated Joe Crawley in New York’s 14th congressional district. This sent shock-waves throughout the CommuNazi Party. Everyone was asking how a nobody who calls herself a “Democratic Socialist” could have defeated the 10 term incumbent.
The answer is simple. She went with the tried and true progressive standby of promising everyone everything. Since then, Ocasio-Cortez has been all over the media as the “New Face of the Democrat CommuNazi Party.” What she and a few others like her have been doing is tearing the CommuNazi party apart.
The problem with the 28 year old socialist is that she is proving to be flat out stupid, not to mention antisemitic. Apparently, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez graduated fourth in her class from Boston University’s College of Arts and Sciences in 2011 with a bachelor’s degree in economics and international relations. The problem here is that she is totally clueless about economics and apparently doesn’t know anything about international relations. If she was 4th in her class, I wonder just how valuable this degree is, considering all the mistakes she’s making.
I’m not alone in looking at this idiot and wondering if she has any clues at all on how the world works. For instance, in a column in the American Spectator by David Catron, he notes all the unforced errors she’s making:
Since her surprise primary victory over 10-term Congressman Joe Crowley in New York’s 14th District, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has been promoted by the legacy media as the prototype of a new generation of young progressives destined to replace the leadership of the Democratic Party.
Unfortunately for her media boosters, however, she keeps blowing her lines. It’s not just her rote advocacy of single-payer healthcare and guaranteed government jobs, or even that she backs wacky ideas like abolishing ICE and occupying airports — Ocasio-Cortez is genuinely clueless. She outed herself, in several recent interviews, as functionally illiterate in economics, international relations, and history.
And this is a person who graduated 4th in her class in just those subjects? Makes me wonder how she achieved that. The first thing that comes to mind involves a sort of trade between her and her professors. Now, just how badly has she been screwing up?
During a PBS interview with Margaret Hoover, for example, Ocasio-Cortez was unable to provide a coherent answer to a softball economics question that could have been successfully fielded by any Econ 101 student at a community college.
According to her campaign website she “earned degrees in Economics and International Relations” at Boston University. But, when Hoover asked her to comment on the low unemployment rate, Ocasio-Cortez revealed that she hasn’t a clue concerning how that statistic is calculated: “Well, unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs. Unemployment is low because people are working 60, 70, 80 hours a week and can barely feed their kids.”
Rather then pause a moment and think, something that this Marxist Moron has never done in her life, she doubled down on stupid.
Ocasio-Cortez could have gotten away with that dumb comment about unemployment if she hadn’t further highlighted her ignorance with this observation: “I do think right now we have this no holds barred, Wild West hyper-capitalism.”
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez Doesn’t have a clue about how regulated the economy is in the United States. Hyper-capitalism? There is no such thing. I suspect all her “teachers” at B.U. are just a pack of Marxists who have never ventured beyond the halls of academia, and if they did, would quickly find that their education and experience qualifies them to say “Would you like fries with your order?”
Incredibly, the various comments Ocasio-Cortez has made on unemployment and capitalism have been absolutely brilliant compared to her often conflicting effusions on international relations and history.
When asked by Margaret Hoover what her position was on Israel, she endorsed a two-state solution and even recognized Israel’s right to exist.
So far so good. Many people would like to figure out how to solve that mess on both sides of the aisle, not to mention in Israel. The problem for Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, is she doesn’t know when to shut her mouth.
She went on to deliver herself of what Joe Lieberman accurately described in the Wall Street Journal as a “reflexive criticism of one of America’s great democratic allies”:
“I also think that what people are starting to see, at least, in the occupation of Palestine is just an increasing crisis of humanitarian conditions.”
Here’s the thing. There has never been a “Palestine” ever. There has been an Israel going back at least 3000 years.
“Palestine” is nothing more than a label assigned to the province created by the Romans after they crushed the last Jewish revolt against their domination of the region. That real estate had already been inhabited by Jews for centuries when Jerusalem was unsuccessfully besieged by the Assyrians in 701 B.C.E, an event independently attested in the records of the Assyrians themselves. Rabbi Andy Bachman tried to educate Ocasio-Cortez on Israel’s history before her botched PBS interview:
Jewish people have had a 3,000-year connection to the land. One can walk around Jerusalem’s ancient settlements that were inhabited by Jews from the era of King David to the prophet Isaiah; from Alexander the Great to King Herod and Jesus; through the pain of Roman exile and a thriving Diaspora; and finally to the modern era’s 19th-century Zionist movement, which revitalized the Hebrew language, established a state (through U.N. acclamation) and won independence in 1948.
Apparently, this got the bimbo in trouble with her Fascist friends. They accused her of changing her position, which for progressives, is the abolition of Israel and the removal of anyone from the region who is Jewish. (I wonder if they have enough railroad boxcars for that in the Middle East?)
What’s going on here, of course, is the collision of empty rhetoric with reality. Until Ocasio-Cortez beat Joe Crowley in the Democratic primary, she was able to parrot the party line of the Democratic Socialists with no pushback. She was, to coin a phrase, preaching to the choir.
Now people are asking her to move beyond slogan. This has revealed that she has never seriously considered her own positions and is stunningly ignorant about the issues.
What it is showing is just how bankrupt the Progressives are. Ocasio-Cortez is a product of the American education system. She has led a life of privilege and has never had to really work at anything. One of her planks in her platform is a free college education.
If that bimbo thinks I’m going to pay for the crap that was poured into her empty head, she needs to think again. She is not ignorant, she is stupid. Ignorance can be cured with knowledge. There is no cure for stupidity. Honestly, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez might just win. The people in her district are probably even dumber than she is. If she does lose, she should consider a career change. I think she might do very well in the Adult Entertainment field. What those “actresses” do doesn’t require a lot of thinking, so Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez should fit right in.
Thatisall
(2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...
~The Angry Webmaster~
