Good day all. What is it with Progressive Liberal Democrats accusing people they hate of activities that they are actually doing? Yes, there is a term for this. It’s called “Projection.” Recently, I wrote a post regarding New York Attorney General Letitia James playing fast and loose with mortgages. Well, it looks like another shoe has dropped.
It seems that Letitia James issued a declaration that a house she buying in Virginia was going to be her primary residence. Here are the details from White Collar Fraud:
Letitia James, New York’s Attorney General, has built her career on exposing deception. But a quiet real estate transaction in Norfolk, Virginia—carried out just weeks before the Trump fraud trial she championed—now raises serious questions about her own compliance with New York law.
A declaration buried in legal filings states her intent to make a Virginia house her principal residence:
“I HEREBY DECLARE that I intend to occupy this property as my principal residence.”
If that Progressive Liberal Democrat retard actually did this, she broke a number of laws in New York and disqualified her self as the Attorney General. You need to be an actual resident of the State to be the Attorney General. I’ve actually looked this up. According to the State of New York, one of the requirements is being a resident of the state 5 years immediately preceding election.
Obviously, Letitia James met that criteria. However, I asked a follow up question on what would disqualify Letitia James from continuing in the office of Attorney General of the state of New York. TwitterX’s Grok provided the following answer:
Loss of Residency: The New York State Constitution (Article XIII, Section 13(a)) requires the Attorney General to be a resident of New York State for at least five years immediately preceding their election. If it is determined that the Attorney General no longer maintains residency in New York, they could be deemed ineligible to hold office. For example, declaring a primary residence in another state in legal filings could raise questions about compliance with this requirement.
Well, well well. Isn’t that interesting? It seems that Letitia James may not have been legally entitled to bring that bogus case against President Trump in the first place.
Those words appear in black and white in a Specific Power of Attorney, signed by James and filed in Norfolk on August 17, 2023, authorizing her relative Shamice Thompson-Hairston to act on her behalf in a transaction that included the declaration. They were not written by a lawyer acting on James’ behalf. They were her words. Her intent. Her signature.
This signed power of attorney is a smoking gun on its own, completely separate from how the mortgage might be interpreted. It stands as a clear declaration of intent from a sitting New York Attorney General to establish principal residency in another state.
The White Collar Fraud story goes into far greater detail on this transaction in Virginia and other shady deals that James may have been involved in. This is why it matters.
The Attorney General holds a unique position of public trust. James won a $350 million verdict against Trump for misrepresentations in property valuations. The central claim in that case—that Trump misrepresented property values and usage for financial gain—bears a troubling similarity to the questions now surrounding James’s own real estate declarations.
So basically, it’s looking a lot like Letitia James’s is not that honest in her real estate dealings. Add this to her history of abusing her office to go after her political enemies, (President Donald Trump), and shady doesn’t cover it. This looks a lot like outright corruption and fraud. By rights, the State Legislature and the Governor’s office should be asking James some very pointed questions. I also think that this should be brought up with regards to the appeals President Trump’s is working on.
It may be that the entire case was brought by someone who legally had no authority to do so in the first place. (Never mind the bogus nature of the case in the first place. I don’t expect the State of New York to do bupkis about this issue. I would like to see this blow up all over the internet. One thing that just occurred to me. Are there any federal crimes she may have committed? This transaction definitely crosses state lines so it would be a federal matter. Paging Pam Bondi! Pam Bondi! You might have a pickup to make on aisle New York!
Thatisall
(3 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...
~The Angry Webmaster~
