ARREST The Democrats for TREASON!! Yeah, no

Good day all. For years we have seen the Democrat Party and it’s minions, especially in the last few years, committing acts that many are saying is treason. The most recent incident were the calls by the Seditious Six for the military to, for all intents and purposes, mutiny against the Commander in Chief.

Many people have stated that this and other incidents are either Treason or Sedition and have called for the arrest of a number of Democrats on these charges. Obviously, this hasn’t happened. There is a reason for this. The major one, Treason, is the only crime that is listed in the Constitution of the United States and is intentionally very tough to prove. Here is the constitutional definition of Treason:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.

The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.

This is under Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution. Obviously, the authors of this section didn’t know about modern recording tools, which is why it requires two witnesses or a confession in Court. What the Seditious Six did, and are continuing to do, doesn’t even come close to what is potentially considered to be Treason in the United States.

This brings us to Sedition. Actually, there is no law in the United States regarding Sedition. There is one called Seditious Conspiracy. This is covered under 18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy. This requires an actual conspiracy between two or more people. With the Seditious Six, we definitely meet the part about conspiracy in the sense that these buffoons were talking with each other and whatever genius came up with and paid for this video. However, the Seditious part is far more problematical. Here is the actual statute:

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

Now the Garland DoJ used this statute on some of the Proud Boys for the January 6^th protest. Anyone who payed attention knew it was a clear misapplication of the law, especially since the defendants were not even in the city at the time. It was a classic railroad job and it took President Trump to pardon the people to correct the blatant miscarriage of justice. With regards to the Seditious Six, this statute is even less applicable.

Other people, looking at what these pinheads could be charged with, landed on the use of Insurrection. This is covered under 10 U.S. Code Subtitle A Chapter 13 Part I – INSURRECTION. There are several subsections to this, and reviewing them, I think that 10 U.S. Code § 253 – Interference with State and Federal law is the closest that could be applicable. It reads:

The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—

(1)

so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(2)

opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.

Honestly, I don’t see this as really being applicable either. So, it looks like Treason, Seditious Conspiracy and Insurrection, while the Seditious Six may be guilty of in the court of public opinion, can’t be used against these Stage Four TDS sufferers. So what can be done about them? Well, in the case of Mark Kelly, there is an option. Of the Seditious Six, he is the only one who retired from active duty and collects a military pension. Theoretically, he could be recalled to active duty and face a court martial.

Kelly is being investigated by the Pentagon, however I don’t see this being used. What could be used is 18 U.S. Code § 2387 – Activities affecting armed forces generally. This law deals with people basically trying to get military personnel to ignore orders or mutiny. Here is what the Statute says:

(a) Whoever, with intent to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States:

(1)

advises, counsels, urges, or in any manner causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States; or

(2)

distributes or attempts to distribute any written or printed matter which advises, counsels, or urges insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

(b)

For the purposes of this section, the term “military or naval forces of the United States” includes the Army of the United States, the Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Coast Guard Reserve of the United States; and, when any merchant vessel is commissioned in the Navy or is in the service of the Army or the Navy, includes the master, officers, and crew of such vessel.

Considering what those morons said, and what was implied, if the DoJ is going to hang anything on the Seditious Six, it’s this one. Now in the video, they were telling the military that they don’t have to obey illegal orders. The implication is that President Trump, as Commander in Chief, had been issuing illegal orders. There is one problem with this. President Trump hasn’t issued any orders that could be considered illegal.

Everyone in the military is schooled extensively in what constitutes an illegal order. An example would be an officer ordering soldiers to go into a nursery and set fire to babies. That is an illegal order. Now officers and NCO’s might issue orders that are questionable, but the answer for that is simple. Get the order in writing, signed by the issuing officer and then carry out the order. If there are repercussions, it’s on the officer issuing the order.

What the Seditious Six, and whoever is backing them is actually trying to do is drive a wedge between the military and the Trump Administration. Their goal is to get the military to refuse any orders from the Commander in Chief, and honestly, I won’t be at all surprised if they are hoping for a “7 Days in May” scenario where the military mounts a coup and removes President Trump and his administration from office.

Yes, I know that this sounds like a conspiracy theory. Frankly, I would prefer it to be nothing more than a conspiracy theory, but then you have people like Sen. Ruben Gallego threatening the military if they actually look into recalling Kelly and potentially holding a court martial board.

So, what happens next. Every week we see the Democrats saying and doing things that are similar to what was done in the late 1850’s by the Southern Democrat Plantation owners. They are so full of hate and rage against not just President Trump, but literally half the people in the country that for them, violence isn’t just an option. They are quite literally pushing this country towards another civil war.

It hasn’t even been a year yet, and we are reaching a breaking point. The Democrats love to say it’s the political center and right that are violent and looking for a civil war, but it’s the center/right that is trying to avoid the “Worst Case Scenario.” They know how bad it will be.

I suspect that next year, things are going to happen. Not necessarily violence, but, sadly, that is a good possibility. No, I think we are going to see arrests of Democrat office holders at the local, state and federal level. Not for any grand conspiracy, but for a whole host of crimes. Perhaps we should start with the Seditious Six by using 18 U.S. Code § 2387 – Activities affecting armed forces generally. That statute does seem to be the one that could hold up in a courtroom. We shall see of course.

Thatisall

(2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

Loading...

~The Angry Webmaster~