The FCC and Net Neutrality

Good day all. Normally, something this technical would be handled by the Angry Systems Administrator, but Net Neutrality has become a major political football. I’ve written about it off an on for a few years, but haven’t bothered with it much of late.

However, yesterday, the Federal Communications Commission repealed the regulations that were created under the Great Mistake, Barack Obama’s regime. The FCC has been talking about doing this since President Trump was sworn in. The discussions, debates and comments have unleashed nuts from all sides, culminating in a bomb threat the day the FCC voted to repeal the regulations.

One of the reasons I’ve stopped paying much attention to this subject is that no one can truly define what “Net Neutrality” really is. The plan by Der Fubar and his minions was nothing less then control of the Internet with an eye to censoring any views that the Progressive Liberal Democrats didn’t like. They sold the regulations as making sure that ISP’s didn’t block web sites and downgrade network transmissions.

There has always been a major question on the legality of the regulations passed. One was the FCC’s actual authority to basically seize control and whether or not Congress actually gave them the authority to do so. Then there was certain constitutional issues, starting with the 1^st Amendment. In any case, no one really explained what the true goals of these regulations were and what they were going to do.

This didn’t stop people from mouthing off. On our main site, there is a section on the Federal Communications Commission, and it has two entries in it. Both deal, in one sense or another, with someone angry at the thought of the FCC giving up governmental control of how ISP’s handle things. I suspect it was the same person posting, although we have no way to tell. The second entry went after the current head of the FCC, Ajit Pai, and, in the typical Progressive Libtard way of debating things, went right to the threats of violence.

We posted both entries, and made a couple of minor comments. These comments apparently set off the poster who forgot the primary rule of Anger Central’s main site. We don’t do debates there. We aren’t set up to do comments on the main site and we do everything we can to minimize any way of tracking people. However, the Blog is an entirely different thing. We have comments through Disqus and we do have some tracking ability.

With that said, I’ve decided to put the latest screech from the Antifa Libtard here since he, she or it decided to make us the target of his, her, its ire. Here is his latest entry:

Ajit Pai

Webmaster you are a fucking idiot for defending this piece of human garbage he obviously doesn’t give a shit what the American People want when it comes to a free internet, he had to stoop as low as create bots and use the identities of the deceased in order to repeal Net Neutrality and ignored the American People just to get his way.

Shit Pai you don’t deserve to breath you deserve to have a bullet shot you in your ugly pathetic face and you deserve to have your flesh eaten by carnivores and have every gallon of blood spilled right out of your pathetic corpse.

Net Neutrality won’t die but Ajit Pai will die a very violent death, I say burn his goddamn house down to the ground and make sure he loses everything, this retard deserves to die a very violent and painful death I say skin him alive and burn his remains.

You want to gut Net Neutrality I say let’s gut you, you sorry pathetic waste of human life I say let’s take a meat cleaver and slice his dick and sell all of Ajit Pai’s remains on the black market. Ajit Pai you will die and Satan is coming for your soul.

So here we have the standard response from the average Progressive Liberal moonbat. If they don’t get their way, or you disagree with what they want or say, go directly to insults and threats. It’s fairly obvious that this knucklehead didn’t bother to actually think about the Notes from Anger Central that were added to the posts.

We, as an organization, come up with these notes. Sometimes they are insulting, sometimes they are helpful. In this case, they were just a simple response along with the notation that making threats against federal officials is against the law. We made no stand one way or the other with regards to Net Neutrality, although I have made a few posts about it here. My main concern was how the FCC’s authority under King Putt was legally questionable, and that, to this day, we do not have a real definition of what Net Neutrality is or what it’s supposed to do.

Now I’ve decided, as the Angry Webmaster, Ruler of all things Anger Central, to not post this mouth breathing moron’s response on the main site, but to put it here. If the raving nut wants to comment, then we’re fully set up here to do so. In general, we don’t block posters of comments, unless they go truly off the deep end, or are just spammers. I think we’ve only had to block one person in the years we’ve had comments enabled. So Mr. Moonbat, if you have something to say, put it in our comments section and let’s do it up right.

Thatisall

~The Angry Webmaster~

[yasr_visitor_votes size=”large”]