Judge in Trump New York Real Estate trial claims he can change the verdict

Good day all. Currently, the Greatest President of the 21st Century, Donald Trump, is sitting through yet another bogus civil trial in New York. This one revolves around his real estate business. The problem, of which there are many, is the judge handling this case. It looks like he’s already decided how it will go.

I won’t bore you with the particulars, other have already done that. The short version is that the corrupt New York State Attorney General, Letitia James, decided that President Trump had defrauded banks that loaned him money. She claims that he overvalued his properties used for collateral. Interestingly, none of the banks are claiming fraud, especially since they “GOT THEIR MONEY BACK WITH INTEREST!

James decided to use some stupid law on the books in New York, that probably goes back over 100 years, to file suit. In one of the initial rulings, the judge handling this case, apparently a hard left Democrat apparatchik, decided that President Trump’s home, Mara-a-lago, was only worth about $18 million dollars.

Real estate specialists in Florida saw this and basically asked “Is this judge smoking Meth?” These people said that the property was worth at least $300 million. When the trial started and the judge saw President Trump arrive, he put on a grin that just smacked of “Oh I am going to get you no matter what! Now we information that may be considering rigging the trial. Here are the details from the Daily Fetched:

The presiding judge in the New York real estate trial of President Donald Trump once boasted he could change verdicts if he believed the jury got “it wrong.”

In a newly unearthed video now circulating on X, the New York District Judge Arthur Engoron is seen telling a college audience he has seen juries frequently reach conclusions he disagreed with.

I’ve had situations where I’m like, oh my… heaven’s sake, how could they have thought that?” Engoron says in the video.

Well, I have a tool that I can deal with that,” said.

It’s called… judgment notwithstanding the verdict.”

I have no idea if this is an actual legal tool. I have heard where judges overturn a verdict, but it’s usually in favor of the defendant. I have a sneaking suspicion that this slug may be planning to hand the plaintiffs the win if the jury rules in favor of President Trump. Considering this clown’s previous ruling on the value of Mar-a-lago, I fully expect this individual has already decided how this case is going to go, not withstanding the actual evidence.

I can say there is no possible way that a reasonable jury would have reached that conclusion,” the Trump judge explained, suggesting he has the power to disregard a verdicts from the jury when he wishes.

I’m an impartial referee, but it’s hard to factor out my own emotions,” he admitted.

You are anything but an impartial referee. You’ve already proven that.

Engoron came under fire during the first day of Trump’s real estate appeal trial after he shrugged at the courtroom audience, a gesture many said signals he already views the outcome as a foregone conclusion.

Meanwhile, Trump and his legal team are battling to overturn a decision by Engoron that concluded the value of Mar-a-Lago is just $18 million, a figure comparable to properties a fraction of its size.

That would be the value of the driveway without asphalt considering the property values in Palm Beach, Florida. Needless to say, this has set off President Trump.

Trump slammed both Engoron and New York Attorney General Letitia James for the continuing “witch hunt” against him, which began with the Manhattan case brought by another Democratic prosecutor.

This case should be dismissed,” Trump told reporters in a hallway in Manhattan Supreme Court.

And she should probably be dismissed also,” he said of James.

As I recall, and I may be mistaken, Letitia James ran on the platform of “Get Trump!” She has spent most of her time investigating President Trump, his family, his associates and his business, not because there was anything there, but to make stuff up to Get Trump! She has been flagrantly abusing her office and in a just society, she would have been removed last year.

This is all part and parcel of the plans of the Democrats, The Biden Maladministration and the Deep State to stop Donald Trump from running for reelection and potentially winning a second term. This explains all the “Novel” charges that the DoJ, Soros District Attorney Bragg, Fat Ass Fani Willis and the evil and utterly corrupt Jack Smith.

I don’t expect President Trump to win since it’s becoming obvious that this judge will rig the trial. His ruling on the value of Mar-a-lago pretty much proves this. Like all of these Progressive judges and prosecutors, they are so fixated on winning that they aren’t considering what might be happening down the road. That, or they have considered and they flat out don’t care. Thanks to the blatant two-tier justice now in force in America, the chances of a National Divorce is now being considered by more and more middle of the road people.

Thatisall

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...

~The Angry Webmaster~

 

Share my Musings on Social Media

About Angry Webmaster

I am the Angry Webmaster! Fear Me!
This entry was posted in Economy, liberty, MAGA, Moonbat, News of the Day, Precious Snowflakes, Stupidity, The Good Idea Fairy and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Judge in Trump New York Real Estate trial claims he can change the verdict

  1. R Slayton says:

    I have a hard time finishing this article when you don’t even know this is a bench trial. There is no jury.

    0
    0
    • Nope I didn’t know, or I should say I was somewhat aware. However, the issue is this judge, and I use that term very loosely, is so biased that it’s not funny. While this may be a bench trial, his remarks that he can overrule a jury and why is the point.

      0
      0

Leave a Reply